• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Johnson hit with paedo charges

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rosco

Worse than Brendan
Member
After his bail was previously extended by police, the decision was taken to allow him to return to play for Sunderland while the investigation continued.

Gerry Wareham, CPS Chief Crown Prosecutor for the North East, said he believed there was a realistic prospect of conviction and it was in the public interest for him to be charged.

"Following an investigation by Durham Police, I have today authorised police to charge Adam Johnson, aged 27, with four offences under the Sexual Offences Act 2003. The offences are alleged to have been committed on one girl aged 15 at the time," he said.

"Adam Johnson was arrested on 2 March this year.

"We have reviewed the available evidence in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors and concluded that there is a realistic prospect of conviction and it is in the public interest to charge Adam Johnson with one offence of meeting a child following sexual grooming, contrary to Section 15 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and three offences of sexual activity with a child, contrary to Section 9 of the Sexual Offence Act 2003. The alleged offences date from 30 December 2014 to 26 February 2015.

"Durham Police have charged the defendant accordingly and he is due to appear before Peterlee Magistrates on 20 May.

"May I remind all concerned that the defendant has a right to a fair trial. It is very important that there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings.

"I would also remind people that the complainant in this case is entitled to lifelong anonymity under the law. For these reasons, it would be inappropriate for me to comment further."
 
This is Section 9, so they're saying they have evidence he did three instances out of the list below

Sexual activity with a child

(1)A person aged 18 or over (A) commits an offence if—

(a)he intentionally touches another person (B),

(b)the touching is sexual, and

(c)either—

(i)B is under 16 and A does not reasonably believe that B is 16 or over, or

(ii)B is under 13.

(2)A person guilty of an offence under this section, if the touching involved—

(a)penetration of B’s anus or vagina with a part of A’s body or anything else,

(b)penetration of B’s mouth with A’s penis,

(c)penetration of A’s anus or vagina with a part of B’s body, or

(d)penetration of A’s mouth with B’s penis,

is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years.
(3)Unless subsection (2) applies, a person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—

(a)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or both;

(b
 
I cant wait to see the transcripts of the texts he was sending.

No doubt he landed himself right in it
 
I cant wait to see the transcripts of the texts he was sending.

No doubt he landed himself right in it
"as a 15 year old girl, and I'm a 27 year old man, would you mind if i:

i) penetrated your mouth with my penis

ii) penetrated you vaginally with my penis

iii) penetrative you anally with my penis or other equipment"
 
1a347de962c82273f893939601d0215d.jpg
 
(i)B is under 16 and A does not reasonably believe that B is 16 or over, or


This bit will be interesting if they have evidence that he *knew* she wasn't over 16..
 
So - he's basically offered her a signed shirt for a blow job.

In his garage.

The.classy guy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom