He's also behind Klavan and Lucas
If you can't get a game ahead of Lucas, you should be able to read the signs
If you can't get a game ahead of Lucas, you should be able to read the signs
Sakho speaks out
- Thread starter Modo
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
I'm not entirely sure he's rectified Moreno. He's stuck Milner in there, who is doing an admirable job, but isn't really a left back
Mhm...
He was basically told as much would happen if he didnt go out on loan though
Drop it! PLEASE!
Mama. A word of advice.
You. Are. Not. A. Scouser.
Or a soldier.
You. Are. Not. A. Scouser.
Or a soldier.
Or a decent centre half.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/liverpool-boss-jurgen-klopp-explain-8589461
I disagree about it not making sense. Sakho is not good enough, and Klopp knows it.
Sending him home from tour: fine - authority asserted. But freezing him out is just silly and counter-productive. If you want him out, then play him in the ressies, keep him fit, and he'll soon realise it's best to move on and he'll do so. But if you regard him as a disruptive presence (mysteriously more disruptive than when he was in the team last season getting hugs and pats on the back after great European nights), then don't leave the man with nothing to do - that's just mad. 'Oh yes, Sakho, he's prone to getting bored and messing around, so we'd better cut him out of all games and give him nothing to work for, whilst still having him train with the first team, that should solve that'.
Really? This treatment does not reflect a simple assertion that Klopp thinks he isn't good enough.
It makes no sense at all. If you think a player isn't good enough, just sell him.
This smacks loudly of a player who has deeply annoyed Klopp and is being punished
Whatever he did on that tour was obviously bad.
I agree kinda with Woland and Macca but it must be said he did bring this about. He clearly wasnt acting in the best interest of the club, and its all well and good moaning about it. You cant piss off the manager and expect him to trust you again.
I agree kinda with Woland and Macca but it must be said he did bring this about. He clearly wasnt acting in the best interest of the club, and its all well and good moaning about it. You cant piss off the manager and expect him to trust you again.
Anyway, who cares? This Sakho has always been a clumsy, error-prone, inconsistent disaster area and I've never liked him
I'm looking forward to seeing the return of the other Sakho, future Captain, best passer of any centre-back, a beast at the back, and our top defender. Where's he?
I'm looking forward to seeing the return of the other Sakho, future Captain, best passer of any centre-back, a beast at the back, and our top defender. Where's he?
Right so cause hes not good enough for the first team , a pro earning fuck knows how much a week isn't going to get a game for the reserves or u23s either .
It's crazy and there's clearly more to it than we know
Think Klavan showed yesterday that he'll be a better defender than Sakho aswell.
Thought he was very good.
The pass he slid through to Milner popping up on the left wing was quite eye-catching, even if it was down to Milner instructing him where to put it, the execution was quite neat
The U23's is a strong team. Noone walks in there on merits.... Earn Your Place!!
Let'a see him tested first before making that assumption.
There were so many games in the past where Sakho and Skrtel/Lovren were completely exposed with no protection from our midfielders.
Not quite fair making the comparison after a game LFC dominated and won by such a massive margin.
Not that I'm a fan of Sakho.
It was indeed. His attempted pass back to Karius, less so.
No, that was quite eye-catching as well I thought, just for all the wrong reasons
Balotelli was never a crowd favourite like Sakho, who always seemed to have plenty of support
Cult favourite type.
Unfortunately for Sakho, he kept getting injured whenever he began to build some momentum in the side. He was decent enough without ever being great.
He was never a "beast" (which to me was always more of a thing built around hope and his "look" than anything else) but neither was he some kind of Traore-esque clown (though he did have his moments, sure).
Lovren, Matip and Klavan have looked pretty solid so far so his absence is proving no great loss on the pitch but as an asset surely it's a different story? I'd have thought he's a pretty saleable asset and surely the longer this goes on, the more rapidly his value will decline.
The whole saga starting with the drugs ban has been bizarre. It's hard to imagine what Sakho could've done that was so bad. Would it not have been better for the club to briefly explain what the situation is and avoid this kind of speculation?
He was never a "beast" (which to me was always more of a thing built around hope and his "look" than anything else) but neither was he some kind of Traore-esque clown (though he did have his moments, sure).
Lovren, Matip and Klavan have looked pretty solid so far so his absence is proving no great loss on the pitch but as an asset surely it's a different story? I'd have thought he's a pretty saleable asset and surely the longer this goes on, the more rapidly his value will decline.
The whole saga starting with the drugs ban has been bizarre. It's hard to imagine what Sakho could've done that was so bad. Would it not have been better for the club to briefly explain what the situation is and avoid this kind of speculation?
- Status