• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Sakho suspended by Liverpool

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, hopefully Skrtel will be back to his best soon.
Sakho has embarrassed the club.
To be honest, I'm more bothered about if we'll be able to sell him at this point.
 
So he wrote this off his own bat ?

Thats fanciful at best. Its perfect from the clubs point of view.


Liverpool FC comment: Mamadou Sakho has some serious explaining to do - Liverpool Echo
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/spor...s/liverpool-fc-comment-mamadou-sakho-11234270


No, it's more fanciful to think Ayre - who is the one who does the important briefings - bothered. Pearce would have got any info he needed from elsewhere. He knows individuals around the club who'll tell him this and that, and the same is true with the players. There's not much there at all, and the tone he sets is one that most people would set. Is that via senior execs at the club? No. The relationship between the Echo and the club has always been close enough for the LFC hack to do these pieces without any detailed discussion. But if you want to carry on with this 'briefing' line, then carry on, I couldn't care less.
 
So he wrote this off his own bat ?

Thats fanciful at best. Its perfect from the clubs point of view.


Liverpool FC comment: Mamadou Sakho has some serious explaining to do - Liverpool Echo
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/spor...s/liverpool-fc-comment-mamadou-sakho-11234270

I understand totally the club wishing to distance themselves from any wrongdoing, and this seems as if the player himself is responsible, but I still don't understand how, if this was leaked on purpose - it helps Liverpool? Is it an attempt at damage limitation? If so, what's the worst kind of damage he could cause?

I don't understand either the posts suggesting this was an "FSG tactic" which they used for the Red Sox. Sakho cots us £18m. We now have an asset who may not play for us for a considerable period, after which his resale value will have been damaged. Where's the benefit?
 
No, it's more fanciful to think Ayre - who is the one who does the important briefings - bothered. Pearce would have got any info he needed from elsewhere. He knows individuals around the club who'll tell him this and that, and the same is true with the players. There's not much there at all, and the tone he sets is one that most people would set. Is that via senior execs at the club? No. The relationship between the Echo and the club has always been close enough for the LFC hack to do these pieces without any detailed discussion. But if you want to carry on with this 'briefing' line, then carry on, I couldn't care less.

Maybe i'm wrong and Pearce writing a piece thats protective of the clubs reputation is a function of some Sturridge like mental weakness that he has
 
I understand totally the club wishing to distance themselves from any wrongdoing, and this seems as if the player himself is responsible, but I still don't understand how, if this was leaked on purpose - it helps Liverpool? Is it an attempt at damage limitation? If so, what's the worst kind of damage he could cause?

I don't understand either the posts suggesting this was an "FSG tactic" which they used for the Red Sox. Sakho cots us £18m. We now have an asset who may not play for us for a considerable period, after which his resale value will have been damaged. Where's the benefit?

Bigger picture - Sponsorship

I thought you would have spotted that
 
Maybe i'm wrong and Pearce writing a piece thats protective of the clubs reputation is a function of some Sturridge like mental weakness that he has
He's Liverpools mouth piece yes, that doesn't mean he requires their briefing every time he writes a positive article for them, it's going to be pretty much his default position regardless.
 
He's Liverpools mouth piece yes, that doesn't mean he requires their briefing every time he writes a positive article for them.

Its not a positive article. Its one that fucks over Sakho for the clubs sake
 
Bigger picture - Sponsorship

I thought you would have spotted that

You mean "it's nothing to do with Liverpool - it's all his fault"?

Yeah, but would that need clarifying? I don't think anyone really thinks this was anything other than one player doing something stupid.
 
FSG paid 18m for Sakho. If they want him out, going about it this way is very quickly taking millions off his transfer value. Which is why it isn't really comparable to what they may or may not have done in baseball.

How out of shape must he have been to lose his place to Kolo Toure?

Maybe the club realized that Sakho was not getting out of this for a long time and this is their first shot. Maybe their way of protecting the club's image by throwing Sakho under the bus. Not sure how effective it is and whether it is needed.

The reason I think all journalist where briefed is that the articles sounded very similar to the ones red sox put out when they wanted certain members of the organization - players and coaches out. In one case I think even details of personal troubles was leaked. FSG did get some heat for that but this is known to be their MO here in the states.

Anyways, from gkmacca's info it looks like this came from outside the club.
 
Funny if true. 2 of their goals came directly from Sakho's poor positioning or failure to stop his man. No Sakho no 2-0 lead.

Ha.. you beat me to this. Ok, so he bagged a goal, but he was utterly dog shit at his job. I hope we sell him, he's shite anyway.
 
picjumbo-premium-walking-alone.jpg
 
SCM is a microcosm of revisionism at its finest

Not really, I mean, I've said all season he's not good enough, I said during the Dortmund game that he fucked up for a couple of goals. His shitness makes it slightly easier to take.

If he was someone really good who we want to pin our hopes on, then I might be a bit more gutted.

As it is, form wise he's the slightly less shitter option we had until the end of the season. It's just a short term blow, but if we take a hit on his sale because of it then I hope he takes a hit on any golden handshake he might have got.
 
That pic made me sad Modo ... Sakho comes off as a good person, helps the needy etc ... He's struggled on and off for most of his career here - be it b/c of injuries or form - but he doesn't come off as a twat or someone who's done something to get ahead ... As I assume he's guilty, I hope he returns to play the game he loves and rebuilds his reputation. Too many football players are absolute twats who don't do nearly as much good as they could with how their talents are paid. Let's hope one of the good ones can make it back - with us or someone else.
 
That pic made me sad Modo ... Sakho comes off as a good person, helps the needy etc ... He's struggled on and off for most of his career here - be it b/c of injuries or form - but he doesn't come off as a twat or someone who's done something to get ahead ... As I assume he's guilty, I hope he returns to play the game he loves and rebuilds his reputation. Too many football players are absolute twats who don't do nearly as much good as they could with how their talents are paid. Let's hope one of the good ones can make it back - with us or someone else.

I'd rather we signed someone good that wasn't a drug cheat.
 
Gab Marcotti's take.

[fieldset]
Mahamadou Sakho has been sidelined by Liverpool after UEFA announced they were investigating a possible anti-doping rule violation.

If, as French radio station RMC reported, he took "fat-burning pills," then this is an exercise in extreme stupidity, because anyone in football knows that some supplements contain substances that can lead to positive results.

Reading the ingredients on the label is not enough; that's why top-flight players won't take so much as an aspirin without first consulting their club's medical staff.

Sakho should have known better, simple as that. He's 26 years old and in his eighth season as a professional. And his own teammate Kolo Toure received a six-month ban in 2011 for taking weight-loss supplements while he was at Manchester City.

A "B" sample will be examined but if, as is expected, it emerges that Sakho's positive was for a "specified substance" -- one that is banned but which could have been accidentally ingested rather than one whose sole purpose is performance enhancement -- then he'll likely get a ban of six months to a year, rather than the two- or four-year suspensions handed out in more serious cases.

Still, even the lighter punishment will mean he misses out on the European Championship and possibly the Europa League final. And he will have a stain on his career that won't go away anytime soon.
[/fieldset]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom