• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Is there a long term future for the NFL?

LeTallecWiz

Doos
Honorary Member
Bernard Pollard has a bleak take on the future of the NFL.

The hard-hitting Baltimore Ravens safety told CBSSports.com recently that he doesn't believe the league will be in existence in 30 years because of rules changes instituted in an effort to make the game safer, and the chance a player might die on the field as players continue to get stronger and faster.

"Thirty years from now, I don't think it will be in existence. I could be wrong. It's just my opinion, but I think with the direction things are going -- where [NFL rules makers] want to lighten up, and they're throwing flags and everything else -- there's going to come a point where fans are going to get fed up with it," he told the website.

"Guys are getting fined, and they're talking about, 'Let's take away the strike zone' and 'Take the pads off' or 'Take the helmets off.' It's going to be a thing where fans aren't going to want to watch it anymore."

The issue of football safety was on the mind of President Barack Obama recently when he told The New Republic in an interview for its Feb. 11 issue that, if he had a son, he would think long and hard before allowing him to play the sport.


Obama told the magazine that football fans are going to have to wrestle with the fact that the game will probably change over time to try to reduce the violence.

The president says that some of those changes might make football, in his words, "a bit less exciting" but that it will be much better for players.

"And those of us who are fans maybe won't have to examine our consciences quite as much," he said.

NFL spokesman Greg Aiello responded to Obama's comments Sunday, saying the NFL has "no higher priority than player health and safety at all levels of the game."

Pollard said he understands the movement to make the game safer for players, but coaches are looking for players who are "stronger and faster year in and year out. And that means you're going to keep getting big hits and concussions and blown-out knees.
"The only thing I'm waiting for ... and, Lord, I hope it doesn't happen ... is a guy dying on the field. We've had everything else happen there except for a death. We understand what we signed up for, and it sucks," he told the website.

Pollard has a reputation for big hits. He was fined $15,250 for unnecessary roughness last week for his third-quarter hit on New England Patriots wide receiver Wes Welker in the Ravens' AFC Championship Game victory.

Pollard received a 15-yard penalty on the play for striking an opponent in the head and neck area.

He also forced a crucial fumble, however, by knocking running back Stevan Ridley out of that game. He was not penalized or fined for the hit on Ridley.
 
They won't control guns, I can't see any reason why they will control this.
 
If a league that allows the hits the NFL used to allow springs up, it could hurt the NFL. But the whole concussion issue probably means that won't happen.

I'm not surprised people are pissed off seeing moderately talented QBs break Dan Marino's record
 
Nah, Vince McMahon tried that with the XFL. Let's have utter mayhem and massive hits! Instead of a coin toss, we'll throw the ball out and have one player from each team scramble to get it for opening possession! Brilliant! Only, first game the two dudes ploughed into each other and got injured. And all the QBs were useless, so the games were shite. It would cost an astronomical amount to start up a seriously competitive opposition league these days.

The lawsuits mean the NFL have to change the game slightly, but people will still watch it and still love it. Hell, they swaddle the QBs these days, and it has led to a more open and offensive game (an average of two points extra per game from a decade ago), but also puts more value on good defence as anyone who excels that side of the ball will do well. A good tackle doesn't have to be hard. To be honest, the biggest threat to that side of the game is the appalling quality of tackling across the board in the NCAA the last few years. Watching the Texas D last season was like watching a cat trying to catch soap. Learn to wrap your man up. You don't have to decapitate him.

Fans will just have to get used to records falling as the game changes, in the same way cricket fans have accepted changes in stats. Or baseball, wit all its bullshit. You can't really make historical comparisons. Doesn't mean the game is going to die. Medium term viewing figures trends are at an all time high, and football has one very valuable aspect - scarcity. You only get five months of it. People will always want more.
 
It does, its like any other potentially dangerous behavior, nobody ever thinks it will happen to them.
 
The Australian Rugby League have outlawed shoulder charge tackles in time for the upcoming season. Primarily because of the furore that this tackle caused towards the back end of last season:



Some have speculated that it might drive fans away but I don't think so.

Don't think so for the NFL either.
 
Back
Top Bottom