I think the "goals for" column is the most damning. 16 goals in 16 games, 3rd worst output in the league... You can never string a run of wins together while scoring 1 goal per game on average - there will be lots of draws and narrow losses, which is what gets teams relegated.
For some reason they stopped the Solskjær table in Norwegian papers. They have also stopped the livefeeder with Man U news. I think a couple of the newspapers still have a dedicated reporter located in Manchester though.
And the "pisshead" in one of the leading papers, who is a real big United and Solskjær fan, keep on editing the initial comments he publishes by the hour until it fades out of the main page on their website. The first publishing is often just a number of sentences telling how dificult the rebuilding of Man U is, that Solskjær has trouble but thankfully the clubs board understand how difficult task he has and how unfair the fans on social media can be since Ole is manager of "the biggest club in the world". You wouldn't believe how much bullshit one "respected" journo can put together. After the the loss yesterday he started to point out that it would be a storm around Ole, a storm that you would not see at Bramall Lane, Amex stadium or Turf Moor (Don't know why Sheff Utd, Brighton and Burnley were picked out though). I did a quick check and found out that Brighton and Sheff Utd are at the same number of points as Man U (marginal goal difference in Uniteds favour) and Burnley is 3 points ahead of them. I could not read out of his piece of crap comment if he suggested that these clubs were clubs "The world biggest football club" (first time in ages he left that sentence out by the way) should be measured against and therefore feel that the critcism against Ole is still unfair or that these clubs should do even better. It was just a lot of sentences put together saying nothing as he clearly has nothing sensible to say any more. I love it.
