This thought was inspired by the discussion going on in the Gerrard thread.
Who are the managers currently plying their trade at the top level, who also had stellar - or at least very successful - playing careers?
I've got:
I bet we could come up with a list of top level managers who either never played or had unsuccessful careers (we've had Ged, Rafa and Kloppo at Liverpool alone) that would be a lot longer than the first list.
Is there a correlation? Is playing instinctive (as well as athletic, obviously) while managing is more of a brain game? Is it a question of desire to carry on after a career at the top vs taking today's pots of cash for punditry?
Why do so few players take all that experience from a career at the top, playing under numerous managers, and NOT translate it to the training ground? Or worse still, why do some of them try it out for a bit and fail so spectacularly?
Who are the managers currently plying their trade at the top level, who also had stellar - or at least very successful - playing careers?
I've got:
- Pep
- Ancelotti
- Koeman
- De Boer
- Conte
- Blanc
- Simeone
- Mancini
- Zidane (jury is out on managing career to this point, good start though)
I bet we could come up with a list of top level managers who either never played or had unsuccessful careers (we've had Ged, Rafa and Kloppo at Liverpool alone) that would be a lot longer than the first list.
Is there a correlation? Is playing instinctive (as well as athletic, obviously) while managing is more of a brain game? Is it a question of desire to carry on after a career at the top vs taking today's pots of cash for punditry?
Why do so few players take all that experience from a career at the top, playing under numerous managers, and NOT translate it to the training ground? Or worse still, why do some of them try it out for a bit and fail so spectacularly?
Last edited: