• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Adam Johnson Held Over Sex Claim

Yeah, she's 15

If the alleged deed happened, I think the defence could be based around whether she actually told the truth about her age or not..

He has not raped her, and it seems she was game as it appears to be consensual..

This country has a huge habit of finding someone guilty before trial..

That being said if he is found guilty after trial.. then he has been a very silly boy indeed...
 
Sell the story.. compensation for his daughter..

I dunno something does not seem right with this..

Well the fathers first move was to ring the police. Not the first thing I'd do if I wanted to make money. And given she can't be identified what sort of money can you make?

It's quite obvious the police tipped off the paper.
 
Well the fathers first move was to ring the police. Not the first thing I'd do if I wanted to make money. And given she can't be identified what sort of money can you make?

It's quite obvious the police tipped off the paper.

I meant he could seek compensation on her behalf from him in court if johnson is found guilty
 
I cant comment I don't know the facts of the case..

But surely even if it underage and proved consensual it cannot be classed as rape ?


It's statutory rape.

If one person is under the age of consent, then the consent they give is not regarded as legal consent. Obviously, as they are not old enough to decide on whether they should or not.

So it is rape.
 
It's statutory rape.

If one person is under the age of consent, then the consent they give is not regarded as legal consent. Obviously, as they are not old enough to decide on whether they should or not.

So it is rape.


right explained better than I could understand

makes sense I guess

So if the alleged incident happened, then its just a question of wether she told the truth about her age or not..

If he met her in a over 18's nightclub, he is hardly at fault is he ?
 
I meant he could seek compensation on her behalf from him in court if johnson is found guilty

Not a case I'd be keen to try, and I've never seen it happen.

I always think the simplest explanation is usually the right one, I find it almost impossible to believe a 15 year old hatched a plan with her father to get money from Johnson.

Its absurd
 
Just seen the photo of the girl.

She looks much older than she is, that's impossible to argue with, but she's not pretty, she looks dani bear or a stereotypical Essex girl, all nose job & pouty lips.

Not that it's the issue if he knew she was under 16 anyway.

How ya see a pic? Twitter? Send me a link please.
 
This country has a huge habit of finding someone guilty before trial...
It does indeed, unfortunately saying something like that makes people assume that you sympathise with the accused, rubbish, I just want a court to decide he's guilty become condemning him, not the papers.
 
I did that and the first image is a girl posing with Johnson himself. That her?
 
It does indeed, unfortunately saying something like that makes people assume that you sympathise with the accused, rubbish, I just want a court to decide he's guilty become condemning him, not the papers.

So you've no problem with him allegedly grooming 15 year olds on the Internet until a court says he's a rapist?
 
Type 'Adam Johnson girl photo' into twitter search.

Not comfortable posting a direct link here tbh, as it is technically illegal I think.
 
Ah fuck it.

Here's the link to someone tweeting it.

Copy & paste it (it's in code to stop Google bots grabbing it)

Code:
 https://twitter.com/RDuckworth15/status/573094666318585856
 
Ah fuck it.

Here's the link to someone tweeting it.

Copy & paste it (it's in code to stop Google bots grabbing it)

Code:
 https://twitter.com/RDuckworth15/status/573094666318585856

That's the photo of his current missus that he cheated on
 
Ok. Found the girl in question.

If anything she looks younger than 15.

He's getting bummed in the showers & rightly so (in prison, not in the Sunderland changies, I assume).
 
It's statutory rape.

If one person is under the age of consent, then the consent they give is not regarded as legal consent. Obviously, as they are not old enough to decide on whether they should or not.

So it is rape.

You really shouldn't be shouting so load about stuff you obviously know SFA about. It is only statutory rape if she is under 13 years old. Otherwise it is consensual sex with a minor.
 
Her social media post that set the alarm bells ringing leaves no fucking doubt in my mind.
 
Back
Top Bottom