Klopp probably was a factor, but if we went head to head with city for a transfer there would be zero chance.
Not necessarily. To begin with City were hot to trot for Virgil at the same time as we were. The story eventually put out was that they didn't want to pay what Southampton were charging but there were also suggestions in the press that Klopp had sold Virgil on our "project", so Virgil told Southampton and City that he was Liverpool-bound come what may and City were just trying to put a brave face on things. In this version (which I can well believe) the fuss cooked up about our supposed "malpractice" was that b@stard Les Reed's last attempt to keep City interested.
