• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Bite, Nibble, Munch and Chomp

Apologies, I wasn't clear. Tittle tattle in the press and tv at home is largely irrelevant in my opinion.

A better question is 'has the British media influenced FIFA's decision making, increasing the sanction on Luis Suarez'?

That seems to be what Uruguayans are insinuating. Personally I think they're overstating the British media's reach, if they have any reach at all.

I think they're just looking for a scapegoat in an attempt to deflect attention from Luis. In fact, I'm surprised the Uruguayan FA hasn't been taken to task for it's conduct.

I guess over the long haul, they've helped paint a picture of Suarez and that's obviously played some part in the overall perception of him, which has had some leverage in his punishment, but you're right, his colours have been pretty much nailed onto the mast by himself.

At first he probably was victimised, but now Suarez is more or less anticipating and predicting the backlash and playing upto it to provoke the shitstorm. He seems to think it's an excuse to fall back on so he can do what the fuck he likes, which is obviously retarded thinking.

He said earlier in the week after the England game, that he had proven the English media "wrong". Then a day later he goes and bites a player, prompting the exact response he said he's won the battle against.

I honestly think he's that thick that he's not really thought it through and done it to use the media as a scapegoat reason for him to jump ship, I think that's at least part of it, it's certainly convenient anyway.
 
He only lied this time because he knew he'd repeated the action IN SPITE of all the help he'd been given since the last time. I suppose it was the evil English who hacked into the Dutch press to brand him a cannibal when he was at Ajax? This sad little man lies when he thinks it will help him, and is honest when he either thinks it will work in his favour or simply when he feels he has no choice. As for lying being some kind of exclusive English cultural thing, then: bollocks, and you know it. You're sounding like his uncle/cousin/agent/solicitor. An apologist. He has more than enough of those already.

You'd think Fifa would be more "kind" when punishing him if he showed some kind of regret and understanding.
I know I've fucked up and need help sort of explanation.

But, when you just try to lie about the whole thing and and say it was just a normal match situation, you look like massive lying tool. He's brought this on himself. The media love to write about him and the morale highground is sickening but he's the one responsible.
 
Suarez isn't stupid enough to think it would convince the people who helped him or anyone else. .

Alas, I'm afraid he probably is. He's a sad little man-child, and all of this frankly desperate straining to excuse him and blame others will do him no good at all.
 
Alas, I'm afraid he probably is. He's a sad little man-child, and all of this frankly desperate straining to excuse him and blame others will do him no good at all.


I think you have it spot on there. I have come to the conclusion that Luis thinks he can play by his own 'rules', has no respect for anyone, and genuinely can't understand why 'it' was even brought up (paraphrasing his national captain). He really is that kid who takes his ball home because he's losing.

To date he's ignored his wife's advice, his employers help, the football authorities sanctions and has taken refuge in his countrymen's defiance.

Who, here, really thinks this is the last time he's going to do stupid stuff on the pitch?
 
Dalglish has come out an said the club will likely stand by him and not sell him..

He argues the change of environment may of led to Suarez's misgiving in the World Cup...

[article]Liverpool FC icon Kenny Dalglish is confident the Reds won't turn their back on Luis Suarez - but admits the striker needs help after his latest bite.

Dalglish brought Suarez to Anfield from Ajax in January 2011, and was in charge as manager when Suarez was banned for eight games after being found guilty of racially abusing Patrice Evra later that year.

The 27-year-old now faces 13 games on the sideline for the Reds after FIFA handed him a four-month ban from all football activities following his bite on Italy defender Giorgio Chiellini - the third time he has been banned for biting an opponent.

In his Daily Mirror column, Dalglish writes: It is my belief that when you bring a player to a football club, he becomes your responsibility.

"I know that lots of people are jumping up and down and saying that Liverpool should disown Luis Suarez.

"Others are saying that the striker has become more trouble than he is worth, too.

"But you don’t just turn your back on someone because he has done something wrong.

"I think you will find that Liverpool will not turn their back on Suarez, whatever the ban FIFA have decided he must serve."

Suarez was in magnificent form for Liverpool last season, scoring 31 goals and avoiding any controversy.

And Dalglish points to Suarez's change of behaviour following his bite on Branislav Ivanovic in April 2013, adding the change of environment has not helped Suarez.

"He had meetings with the club psychiatrist, Steve Peters, as other players have, and he showed remorse and a willingness to be rehabilitated," adds Dalglish.

"If a player shows a willingness to be helped, then you have a responsibility to help him.

"He went to Uruguay to prepare for the World Cup and Liverpool had no control over him from that point."

Suarez has come in for support from some quarters because of the severity of the suspension.

He is now not allowed to train or enter a football stadium for the duration of his ban, with the striker also missing more games for club than country.

"When he was punished by the FA for the biting incident with Branislav Ivanovic and banned from domestic games, he was still allowed to play for his national team," writes Dalglish.

"It seems a bit strange, then, that when he is banned for something he did with his national team, his club has to suffer, too."

[/article]
 
Closed season : SCM = Suarez haters
Football season : SCM = Suarez lovers (except Rosco)

Like when you're getting an amazing blow job off a beautiful woman, she may be cheating on you but at that moment when she's doing that magic, you don't care a jot.

Once she stops you realise she's a cheating whore, obviously.
 
Like when you're getting an amazing blow job off a beautiful woman, she may be cheating on you but at that moment when she's doing that magic, you don't care a jot.

Once she stops you realise she's a cheating whore, obviously.



Ah I see you have the same issues as me.. the only blow jobs you get these days are the ones you dream..


Shit isn't it..
 
Was playing a game of FIFA this morning with my housemate. He was dressed as a Qatari and kept handing me wads of money.
 
Fucking clown...

@LivEchoLFC: Reports suggest FIFA considered six-match ban for Luis Suarez, but increased length due to lack of remorse: http://t.co/LOfNVPdMUu

Actually think that the level of remorse should have no bearing on punishment. Punish the crime and nothing else.

Have same issue with the concept that appealing can lead to an increase in punishment. If an appeal does not have merit, it should be dismissed - simple. No need for the arrogant, how dare you question the judgement of....FA, UEFA, FIFA, Name_Corrupt_Organization_of_Choice?
 
Actually think that the level of remorse should have no bearing on punishment. Punish the crime and nothing else.

Have same issue with the concept that appealing can lead to an increase in punishment. If an appeal does not have merit, it should be dismissed - simple. No need for the arrogant, how dare you question the judgement of....FA, UEFA, FIFA, Name_Corrupt_Organization_of_Choice?

I dunno, I can't agree regards remorse, but appealing should never increase the punishment, ever, unless the delay in appealing is proved to be to gain an advantage (which it can't in this case).

It's only purpose is to prevent appeals from being made, an attempt to make their own judgements sacrosanct.

In a similar manner the government here have decided if you are on the motorway & get a ticket for anything, if you appeal & fail you get a £10,000 fine.

Meaning only the very wealthy will escape even genuine errors.
 
Actually think that the level of remorse should have no bearing on punishment. Punish the crime and nothing else.

Have same issue with the concept that appealing can lead to an increase in punishment. If an appeal does not have merit, it should be dismissed - simple. No need for the arrogant, how dare you question the judgement of....FA, UEFA, FIFA, Name_Corrupt_Organization_of_Choice?
I agree. Until the day where we have mind reading technology which can detect whether remorse is real or fake, using remorse to sentence someone is pointless
 
I think you have it spot on there. I have come to the conclusion that Luis thinks he can play by his own 'rules', has no respect for anyone, and genuinely can't understand why 'it' was even brought up (paraphrasing his national captain). He really is that kid who takes his ball home because he's losing.

To date he's ignored his wife's advice, his employers help, the football authorities sanctions and has taken refuge in his countrymen's defiance.

Who, here, really thinks this is the last time he's going to do stupid stuff on the pitch?

Oh come on, the look on his face at the end of that game was pretty clear. He knew he'd acted like a dick. But he didn't lie to the public afterwards, he just desperately played it down so as to avoid getting banned. Then he had no choice but to lie to FIFA as that was the only possible way to escape a ban.

Avoiding a ban is not him thinking he can do what he wants. What the fuck is a ban and a fine to him? It's not a punishment for him in the true sense of the word. The reason he didn't want a ban is because he didn't want to let down his country and club. Otherwise a ban means nothing to him other than an extended summer holiday. You see that right? He knows he's fucked up, and he's trying to get out it because of the affect it will have on Uruguay and Liverpool.

If he got away without a ban, it would do nothing to clear his reputation. Everyone saw what happened. The only thing it would achieve is Suarez wouldn't have to feel like his actions harmed other people.
 
“It was a real blow for us to lose Luis, but you can’t do anything against video evidence,” shrugged Cavani.
“I think the decision was too severe for him, for his career and for this squad. But it’s not just one player out there. It’s a team and today we tried to implement what we’d prepared for this game.”


but wait , i thought he just tripped ? So some of them did see something ?
 
If the latest quotes I heard from Suerez are true,about him losing his balance and falling onto the opponents shoulder, then he really is a stupid fucking cunt and has embarrassed himself and this club one time too many.

He should not be paid a penny from LFC while he sits on the side lines.
 
suarez-pringles.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom