Gvardiol maybe but expensive as hell.
Cunha was AM. Talking about direct transfers. Olmo yes, only one I can think of. Rest a bit hammy for a club focussed on build and sell. Germany’s Brighton.
Fekir MK II
- Thread starter rurikbird
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
Cunha was AM. Talking about direct transfers. Olmo yes, only one I can think of. Rest a bit hammy for a club focussed on build and sell. Germany’s Brighton.
Yeah, was thinking about directs only.
I see whatbyou did there, but unfortunately for you I only want quality players, BUT for the right price.
They'll still argue we don't need defensive options
I think we clearly need a creative player, whose job is to make clever passes, dribbles and runs that allow us to break down low blocks like Forest and Arsenal. It's okay if this guy doesn't run 12 km every match, as long as he does the business when it matters.
Cherki
Simons
Wirtz (lol) .
All good choices. I think we will target Ketelaere, which would also be a great choice.
Cherki
Simons
Wirtz (lol) .
All good choices. I think we will target Ketelaere, which would also be a great choice.
Frankly that figure has to be wrong too - there's no way a pro footballer is averaging 3kms per game (none, zero, nada), when walking I'm at 4-6kph (so non-stop walking I'd cover 6-9 kms per match), he'd have to be stationary for 80 mins per game (considering his sprints and runs). VvD and Konate are amongst the Bottom 4 in the PL for distance covered per match (8.8 and 9kms each).
We can all pick out the big money failures (for a number of reasons inc. just not being suited to the team), however big money usually means a much better player and a much higher chance of success (this isn't even disputable). No idea what the ratio is but 3:1 (3 a success and 1 a failure)? Wild guess.
However to find those gems from low cost options you'd need to be buying a number of them (and be lucky too) - and then you'd see that affect on the team's performances, of buying too many average - good young players and not enough at the top level (there can always be outlier seasons - all of those clubs have had them - and then sold the players that put them there).
If your club's aim is to be mid-table and survive by buying players, with the odd re-sale bringing in top money when sold to keep you solvent and fund the next round of buying, then it's a good formula for the likes of Brighton, Bournemouth, Wolves, Forest and Villa (the clubs you named).
We are not one of those teams - and again this isn't disputable (cf. City, Arsenal and ourselves).
Please no. Extraordinarily punchable face
Someone on here has said that Simmons is who our data lot want, don't know if true, but for me he should be no. 1 on the list and will be a guaranteed success in my view. He also knows how to get best out of Cody. Its a no brainer for me. From what I saw of the Euros I thought he was the most active and lethal no 10 from a central position. So to me it makes 100% sense that he has been identified as a top candidate by our data nerds.
He can play on the right too
Hmm what are we looking at? He scores a decent goal but for the Auxerre goal he was doing his best Trent impression - 20m outside the area, not making any attempt to get back and throwing his hands up.
His run thru the Auxerre defence before laying it on a plate for Lacazette
TWICE.
Talk about creativity
Tonight will be a good audition for him.
If he can do it against that shiteball United on a wet, windy, Thursday night in the Europa, my appreciation of him will double.
It's crucial for their shiteness to continue, that Amorim doesn't fluke CL qualification.
WTF is with that commentary, its sounded like one of those old fashioned dubbed movies where they couldn't afford the best translators.
Was more impressed with the Georgian. As the commentator said, Cherki does his magic in the last 25 yards. The other 75 + yards he is an on looker ?
