• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Insua going?

Status
Not open for further replies.
[quote author=ragehard link=topic=41687.msg1167274#msg1167274 date=1283260124]
insua going on loan is a poor transfer unless there is a player exchange type arrangement with them.
[/quote]

Why is it a poor transfer?

The only morons who want him dont want to pay what the bigger morons (us) are paying him.

So if it gets a shit over-paid non-playing 'player'off the wage bill it's still better than what we had.
 
Seeing as we paid fuck all for him he can't lose value by going out on loan.. If anything he could get bloody good and gain experience to make him a 'decent' squaddie!!
 
[quote author=Avmenon link=topic=41687.msg1167841#msg1167841 date=1283273142]
[quote author=ragehard link=topic=41687.msg1167274#msg1167274 date=1283260124]
insua going on loan is a poor transfer unless there is a player exchange type arrangement with them.
[/quote]

Why is it a poor transfer?

The only morons who want him dont want to pay what the bigger morons (us) are paying him.

So if it gets a shit over-paid non-playing 'player'off the wage bill it's still better than what we had.
[/quote]

insua played plenty last year and whilst i'm not keen on him i think that when we were offered c4 million for him sending him out on loan for a year with a fuck all purchase fee at the end is a poor transfer. oh and i've seen the fulham full back konwhateverhisnameis - he's far far worse. just wait and see.
 
[quote author=ragehard link=topic=41687.msg1168001#msg1168001 date=1283280828]
[quote author=Avmenon link=topic=41687.msg1167841#msg1167841 date=1283273142]
[quote author=ragehard link=topic=41687.msg1167274#msg1167274 date=1283260124]
insua going on loan is a poor transfer unless there is a player exchange type arrangement with them.
[/quote]

Why is it a poor transfer?

The only morons who want him dont want to pay what the bigger morons (us) are paying him.

So if it gets a shit over-paid non-playing 'player'off the wage bill it's still better than what we had.
[/quote]

insua played plenty last year and whilst i'm not keen on him i think that when we were offered c4 million for him sending him out on loan for a year with a fuck all purchase fee at the end is a poor transfer. oh and i've seen the fulham full back konwhateverhisnameis - he's far far worse. just wait and see.
[/quote]

konchesky worse than insua?

lol

and whats the dilly-o with the "c" before amounts? why not £ or €?
 
Good news for sure.

The amount of goals he cost us last year was untrue.

Johnson was regularly bombing forward, Insua was stuck out of position, leaving the two CB's stretched and Mascherano trying to do the impossible.
 
[quote author=ragehard link=topic=41687.msg1168001#msg1168001 date=1283280828]
[quote author=Avmenon link=topic=41687.msg1167841#msg1167841 date=1283273142]
[quote author=ragehard link=topic=41687.msg1167274#msg1167274 date=1283260124]
insua going on loan is a poor transfer unless there is a player exchange type arrangement with them.
[/quote]

Why is it a poor transfer?

The only morons who want him dont want to pay what the bigger morons (us) are paying him.

So if it gets a shit over-paid non-playing 'player'off the wage bill it's still better than what we had.
[/quote]

As long as we got rid of him - it's all good!

insua played plenty last year and whilst i'm not keen on him i think that when we were offered c4 million for him sending him out on loan for a year with a fuck all purchase fee at the end is a poor transfer. oh and i've seen the fulham full back konwhateverhisnameis - he's far far worse. just wait and see.
[/quote]
 
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=41687.msg1168007#msg1168007 date=1283280996]
[quote author=ragehard link=topic=41687.msg1168001#msg1168001 date=1283280828]
[quote author=Avmenon link=topic=41687.msg1167841#msg1167841 date=1283273142]
[quote author=ragehard link=topic=41687.msg1167274#msg1167274 date=1283260124]
insua going on loan is a poor transfer unless there is a player exchange type arrangement with them.
[/quote]

Why is it a poor transfer?

The only morons who want him dont want to pay what the bigger morons (us) are paying him.

So if it gets a shit over-paid non-playing 'player'off the wage bill it's still better than what we had.
[/quote]

insua played plenty last year and whilst i'm not keen on him i think that when we were offered c4 million for him sending him out on loan for a year with a fuck all purchase fee at the end is a poor transfer. oh and i've seen the fulham full back konwhateverhisnameis - he's far far worse. just wait and see.
[/quote]

konchesky worse than insua?

lol

and whats the dilly-o with the "c" before amounts? why not £ or €?
[/quote]

No......... he said far worse.

regards
 
[quote author=ragehard link=topic=41687.msg1168904#msg1168904 date=1283380686]
far far 🙂
[/quote]

Glad you pointed it out to us all anyway, he's a relative unknown, all we know is he played for that English team Fullham and has played for a few other clubs before. I think the best a handful of fans may know is that he once appeared against English giant, Liverpool in the FA Cup final several years ago, scoring a fortuitous goal.

Forums are great, most fans rely on wikipedia to delve into the history of new signings, thankfully at 6cm we have our very own experts with a wealth of knowledge of the European, and World market.

Rageharder.
 
[quote author=ragehard link=topic=41687.msg1168904#msg1168904 date=1283380686]
far far 🙂
[/quote]

I don't rate Konchesky at all but he's not far far worse than Insua. He's better defensively but in possession he's worse than Insua's Mum. Overall I'd say I'd rather have Konchesky because he's decent at stopping wide men getting past him.
 
Corvino: Reds Defender “wanted €1.2m per seasonâ€

Posted on Thursday, 2nd September 2010 by David Tully

Fiorentina sporting director Pantaleo Corvino has confirmed why Liverpool’s Emiliano Insua failed to complete his £5m move to the Italian club:

“We were interested in a number of players, but made our decisions for a good reason. Emiliano Insua wanted €1.2m per season, which isn’t worth it for someone born in 1989.â€

Insua eventually moved to Turkish club Galatasaray on a season long loan deal, in view to a permanent move, on the last day of the transfer window.

http://live4liverpool.com/2010/09/view-from-the-kop/corvino-reds-defender-wanted-e1-2m-per-season

That is about £20K per week.
I could have sworn that someone on here said he was on nearly £50k a week at Liverpool.
I think it was in a comment that was being both critical of him and of Benitez on the wage agreements we had with our players.
 
I don't think his salary was ever confirmed but in a GDS article it was claimed that he was looking to increase his earnings to €2m p.a but was only offered €800k. At least one online report then jumped to the conclusion he was on £30K/week.
 
I think it was ITK speculation that had him on 40k a week.

That said, there is still nothing to suggest that isn't the case. It may have been a case of not wanting to accept a massive paycut rather than wanting a raise. Who knows... who cares.
 
[quote author=ragehard link=topic=41687.msg1168001#msg1168001 date=1283280828]
[quote author=Avmenon link=topic=41687.msg1167841#msg1167841 date=1283273142]
[quote author=ragehard link=topic=41687.msg1167274#msg1167274 date=1283260124]
insua going on loan is a poor transfer unless there is a player exchange type arrangement with them.
[/quote]

Why is it a poor transfer?

The only morons who want him dont want to pay what the bigger morons (us) are paying him.

So if it gets a shit over-paid non-playing 'player'off the wage bill it's still better than what we had.
[/quote]

insua played plenty last year and whilst i'm not keen on him i think that when we were offered c4 million for him sending him out on loan for a year with a fuck all purchase fee at the end is a poor transfer. oh and i've seen the fulham full back konwhateverhisnameis - he's far far worse. just wait and see.
[/quote]

Yep, you're always right about our players aren't you?

Oh no,actually you rarely are. But carry on posting the same cunt dribbling, drivel from previous times. Its not in the least bit tired.
 
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=41687.msg1170480#msg1170480 date=1283801343]
Yeah but no one else has seen Konchesky play....
[/quote]

Yes, but he's far worse than Insua. Wait and see....
 
Who knew ability in football could be deduced from how many pies it looks like you could eat

Clearly raginghardon likes the look of insuas waddle rather than koncheskys swagger
 
insua was shit, in fact i recall referring to him as fat shit in rafa's quartet that included slowshit, lucshit and dogshit.

of course this did not include the amazing signing of injured shit that i'm pretty sure i said signing was a huge mistake but hey i'm never right about players.

they won't take the option to buy insua next summer and konchesky will have shown us lack of positional discipline costing us goals and points meaning next season we'll be on the lookout for another left back to replace these two.
 
[quote author=ragehard link=topic=41687.msg1170524#msg1170524 date=1283804183]
insua was shit, in fact i recall referring to him as fat shit in rafa's quartet that included slowshit, lucshit and dogshit.

of course this did not include the amazing signing of injured shit that i'm pretty sure i said signing was a huge mistake but hey i'm never right about players.

they won't take the option to buy insua next summer and konchesky will have shown us lack of positional discipline costing us goals and points meaning next season we'll be on the lookout for another left back to replace these two.
[/quote]

Any chance you could spare us your "wisdom" and crawl back to wherever it is you came from? You give foreign / OOT Liverpool fans a bad name with your ill informed opinions spouted as fact.
 
[quote author=ragehard link=topic=41687.msg1170524#msg1170524 date=1283804183]
insua was shit, in fact i recall referring to him as fat shit in rafa's quartet that included slowshit, lucshit and dogshit.

of course this did not include the amazing signing of injured shit that i'm pretty sure i said signing was a huge mistake but hey i'm never right about players.

they won't take the option to buy insua next summer and konchesky will have shown us lack of positional discipline costing us goals and points meaning next season we'll be on the lookout for another left back to replace these two.


[/quote]

slowshit, lucshit and dogshit.

slowshit - aurelio?

lucshit - lucas

dogshit - ?
 
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=41687.msg1170533#msg1170533 date=1283804860]
The contents of rage's cranium
[/quote]

Major lol.
 
slow shit - riera
dogshit - dirk
lucshit - brendan's lovechild

when you replace shit for shit its still shit.
 
[quote author=ragehard link=topic=41687.msg1170565#msg1170565 date=1283808680]
slow shit - riera
dogshit - dirk
lucshit - brendan's lovechild

when you replace shit for shit its still shit.
[/quote]

Renee descartes would be envious of your revelations of reality
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom