Jarrell's Quansong
- Thread starter SummerOnions
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
Not sure that is right, though, he had a good track record of developing young talent in Holland and was supposedly one of the reasons he was hired.
This is why "he never excelled" didn't gel for me.
One wobbly season and fuck off. Again... as far as leaving the club goes, it's rules for thee and not for me.
I like that you made the term seem more inclusive. Everyone can enjoy cake and arse, not just the gays.
And why not? Two of my favourite things.
Its called oogie cookie in the states.
It wasn't gay though, not at all, it was just competitive wanking among many very not gay fraternity pledges, and not gay at all sports teams. It was part of a long tradition of exceedingly no homo practices stretching back to the Greeks mandating nudity in gymnasia.
A sell on clause and buy back would be good.
Good deal this. Good luck to the lad!
View: https://x.com/fabrizioromano/status/1936733250682048573?s=46
View: https://x.com/fabrizioromano/status/1936733250682048573?s=46
I think that's a great all round transfer. Lots of playing time for Q. in a very competitive league and for a very good team. The buy back clause is perfect for us and if he fulfils his potential then that's a major CB slot (we could need 3 over the next 2 seasons) that could be filled!
Have we ever bought someone back under one of these deals? Either way, great bit of money for him.
Good question, don't think we've ever sold anyone with a buy-back clause that actually was worth buying back.
Will be interesting to see how Sepp and Quansah do in the next few years though.
Struggling to think of any example from any club? I think when we sell, we won't buy back anyway. I mean there's no down side, but would rather a sell on, than buy back, or just straight up cash now.
I think Chelsea has done it a few times.
Stats speak for themselves, but for some reason THAT quansah wasn't on display this year. He's had 1 professional season looking a beast and 1 professional season looking iffy. Could it be as simple as he needs to be coddled? Or the first season he was playing without expectation so klopp let him flourish? This season clearly slot wanted to try him, as he started first game of the season. Could he not cope with the increased expectations? Who knows. We never will.
Ultimately, it's a good deal and the buy back clause could be incredible for us if he excels.
This isn't something I've been saying much lately, but Dreamy's absolutely right to call for that.
Yes, Madrid have successfully used buyback clauses plenty of times. Carvajal, Lucas Vasquez, Morata being the best examples.
In fact, they've done it this summer with Nico Paz.
A few other players currently out there with active clauses: https://www.planetfootball.com/real...-youngsters-active-buy-back-clauses-contracts
100%
We're lucky he did, otherwise it wouldn't have happened
That’s very fair..
Could happen. He's got a lot of great attributes. A run of games might be the making of him.
I mean, this has been done before and yes, there are numerous examples from Real Madrid.
I think City had one on Lavia and choose not to trigger it when he went to Chelsea.
I think it’s a risk free move - if the player develops enough to warrant a starting place at Liverpool, then we’ve negotiated a “fair” price which is under what Leverkusen could likely ask for.
If he doesn’t, we’ve banked a good fee.
There’s no downside to the structure of this deal at all.
Yeah, the way the market is going, if he achieved the potential we (well some of us) think he's capable of, then in 3-5 years 60M will be a bargain
I assume that if you get a large buy back fee like this, you give something else up, lower fee, less up front, something else.
Similar threads
