Bell needs to be dropped... he has not come to the party..
Could be a dip in form.. but he has not been great for a while...
Really, you must have missed his 143 on the 13th April, test match as well !

Bell needs to be dropped... he has not come to the party..
Could be a dip in form.. but he has not been great for a while...
Really, you must have missed his 143 on the 13th April, test match as well !
You bring in the players on form, not the bessie mates of Cook. All they need to do with Pietersen is bring him in, knowing he's under huge pressure to deliver. Then he either delivers quickly, or they can drop him on the grounds of not performing. But no, everything the England Test establishment do has to resemble something in a John Le Carre novel.
That being said there seems more to that than meets the eye..
Did Alex Ferguson refused to play Cantona ? No...
Did England Refuse to play Wayne Rooney after his spat with the cameras ? No..
You settle disputes behind close doors.. and let them do the talking on the field..
Yes he can be a tit.. but this England set up are just built not to take risks.. that is their failing.
Would any other Test side exclude KP from their side ??.. the answer is a big fat no...
He is a match winner..
KP slagged off his team mates to the opposing team, which is completely different to the different the examples below.
It would be like Gerard texting john terry before the Chelsea game telling him how much he hates BR.
Awful behaviour.
As good as KP is at cricket he's obviously been able to piss off a lot of people.
It's similar to John Terry being binned off from England for me. Seems fair enough. Just because you're boss doesn't mean you can be a dick
