Liverpool’s bank lenders may be willing to extend their loans to the club but only for a short period to allow time for it to find a buyer, people close to the situation say.
With owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett struggling to put together a refinancing of the club’s £280m debts owed to Royal Bank of Scotland and Wachovia, Christian Purslow, managing director, said on Wednesday that a small number of parties were carrying out due diligence.
But he added that Liverpool’s independent directors would continue to vote against refinancing plans put forward by the owners. In an interview on Liverpool’s website, Mr Purslow said to refinance the club’s debts against assets would require board approval “and the other members of the board have made it clear that’s not what we want to see happenâ€.
He added that refinancing was “very unlikelyâ€.
The US owners were outvoted by the three independent directors – Mr Purslow, chairman Martin Broughton and commercial director Ian Ayre – when they put forward debt refinancing proposals in June.
Last week, Mr Hicks again put forward a refinancing plan, which appears to have been undermined by the withdrawal of GSO Capital Partners, the credit arm of US private equity company Blackstone.
One person familiar with the process said the owners’ price tag of £600m-£800m had put off bidders.
If a buyer is not found before mid-October, among the options is a short extension of the loan to find a buyer, provided there was a “clear plan to resolve the question of ownership and the financial stability†of the club, said one person familiar with the situation.
There would also probably be more severe conditions imposed on the loan.
Mr Purslow said too high a proportion of the club’s revenues and profits was servicing loans, interest costs and bank charges. “Can we afford to meet them? Just about,†he said.
He said Liverpool was “not going bust†and its sale would reduce or wipe out its debts and render it highly profitable.
[/quote]Liverpool’s bank lenders may be willing to extend their loans to the club but only for a short period to allow time for it to find a buyer, people close to the situation say.
With owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett struggling to put together a refinancing of the club’s £280m debts owed to Royal Bank of Scotland and Wachovia, Christian Purslow, managing director, said on Wednesday that a small number of parties were carrying out due diligence.
But he added that Liverpool’s independent directors would continue to vote against refinancing plans put forward by the owners. In an interview on Liverpool’s website, Mr Purslow said to refinance the club’s debts against assets would require board approval “and the other members of the board have made it clear that’s not what we want to see happenâ€.
He added that refinancing was “very unlikelyâ€.
The US owners were outvoted by the three independent directors – Mr Purslow, chairman Martin Broughton and commercial director Ian Ayre – when they put forward debt refinancing proposals in June.
Last week, Mr Hicks again put forward a refinancing plan, which appears to have been undermined by the withdrawal of GSO Capital Partners, the credit arm of US private equity company Blackstone.
One person familiar with the process said the owners’ price tag of £600m-£800m had put off bidders.
If a buyer is not found before mid-October, among the options is a short extension of the loan to find a buyer, provided there was a “clear plan to resolve the question of ownership and the financial stability†of the club, said one person familiar with the situation.
There would also probably be more severe conditions imposed on the loan.
Mr Purslow said too high a proportion of the club’s revenues and profits was servicing loans, interest costs and bank charges. “Can we afford to meet them? Just about,†he said.
He said Liverpool was “not going bust†and its sale would reduce or wipe out its debts and render it highly profitable.
German-based sports consultancy, Sport + Markt, said Barcelona’s European fan base had risen from 44.1m in 2008-09 to 57.8m last season.
But although Barcelona’s fan base is far bigger than the next most popular club, Real Madrid, its Spanish rivals are far more accomplished at making money out of their fans, the consultancy said in a report on Europe’s most popular clubs, published on Thursday.
Measuring the fan base against turnover, Sport + Markt concludes that each European fan of Barcelona is generating €6.30 ($8) in turnover, whereas all its major rivals are making double-digit amounts from each of their fans.
Bayern Munich, for example, is generating €14 per fan, Liverpool €13.30 and Arsenal €12.90. Real Madrid makes €12.80 out of each fan.
While Inter Milan grew its fan base from 10.2m to 17.5m, Real Madrid suffered a decline of 10m to 31m, the consultancy said.
Sport + Markt reached their findings based on a poll of 10,200 people conducted in May across 17 countries
[/quote]Liverpool’s bank lenders may be willing to extend their loans to the club but only for a short period to allow time for it to find a buyer, people close to the situation say.
With owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett struggling to put together a refinancing of the club’s £280m debts owed to Royal Bank of Scotland and Wachovia, Christian Purslow, managing director, said on Wednesday that a small number of parties were carrying out due diligence.
But he added that Liverpool’s independent directors would continue to vote against refinancing plans put forward by the owners. In an interview on Liverpool’s website, Mr Purslow said to refinance the club’s debts against assets would require board approval “and the other members of the board have made it clear that’s not what we want to see happenâ€.
He added that refinancing was “very unlikelyâ€.
The US owners were outvoted by the three independent directors – Mr Purslow, chairman Martin Broughton and commercial director Ian Ayre – when they put forward debt refinancing proposals in June.
Last week, Mr Hicks again put forward a refinancing plan, which appears to have been undermined by the withdrawal of GSO Capital Partners, the credit arm of US private equity company Blackstone.
One person familiar with the process said the owners’ price tag of £600m-£800m had put off bidders.
If a buyer is not found before mid-October, among the options is a short extension of the loan to find a buyer, provided there was a “clear plan to resolve the question of ownership and the financial stability†of the club, said one person familiar with the situation.
There would also probably be more severe conditions imposed on the loan.
Mr Purslow said too high a proportion of the club’s revenues and profits was servicing loans, interest costs and bank charges. “Can we afford to meet them? Just about,†he said.
He said Liverpool was “not going bust†and its sale would reduce or wipe out its debts and render it highly profitable.