• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Liverpool vs Chelsea

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rory Fitzgerald

Very Active
Member
Cover%20Picture%20-%20Garcia.jpg
Sunday April 21st. Kick off 4pm
Live on Sky Sports 1


The main reason for doing this blog was to highlight some statistics about the lesser lights of the Premiership to give the reader a guide as to what the forthcomming game might hold for the Reds as has been done for the recent write-ups against Villa, West Ham and Reading. Given that most people will have a good idea of what the strenghts & weaknesses of Chelsea there is not alot that this preview will be able 'uncover' about Chelsea ahead of this game.

Given that Rafa is their manager, it will come as no surprise that there are differences in their line-up & approach depending on if they are home or away and also the opposition. The purpose of outlining their recent set up at home & away (below) is to show these differences. The Chelsea that plays at home seem to be a more open outfit whereas the team that plays away could be considered tighter. The differences I see are in the back line and in the 'attacking trio'.


Chelsea at home

  • Azpilicueta has played the last 6 games at RB.
  • David Luiz has played in 5 of the last 6 games largely at CB.
  • Hazard, Mata, Oscar played in 2 of last 3 home games.
  • Ramires played last 3 home games with Lampard in midfield.
  • Mikel has only played 1 of the last 6 home games with Rafa picking 2 from Ramires, Lampard and Luiz to hold midfield.
The following graphic shows the average position of the Chelsea players in their last 3 home games. Given that these games were at home against 'average-ish' opposition, they dominated possession and could push the backline high up the pitch. The average position of Bertrand/Cole on the left seems higher than Azpilicueta suggesting that more attacking was down done the left.

However, the most noticeable aspect of these 3 graphics is how narrow they are in attack. Whilst Chelsea's best attacking players have a propensity to come in-field, I would not take the graphics literally (i.e. that they are always standing on each others toes). I think the graphics above highlight a certain tactical fluidity at home. By allowing them to float & interchange in these areas, the average position of each player is almost the same.

Chelsea have won their last 5 home games including the 3 games below.

HOME%20GAMES%20COMPLETED.png



Chelsea in away games

  • Azpilicueta and Luiz have only played together in 1 of the last 6 away games together.
  • If Luiz plays, Ivanovic generally replaces Azpilicueta and provides more stability at RB. If Azpilicueta plays and provides more of an attacking option at RB then Luiz generally drops out and one of Cahill or Terry comes in to partner Ivanovic at CB.
  • Ivanovic has been the one constant in the Chelsea defence when they play away, either at CB but recently at RB,
  • Lampard has started the last 6 away games. Mikel has come in for 2 of the last 3 away games but for the 3 games before that he was on the bench.
The following graphic shows the average position of the Chelsea players in their last 3 away games. Away from home, the average positions of the attacking players suggest a more tactically disciplined approach as the players hold their positions somewhat more than at home. One important difference in their away games is that their 'attacking trio' has included one of either Bertrand or Ramires which provides the team with more width, higher work rate off the ball and some more protection.

Despite setting up with an extra defensively focused defender in the back line and a less attacking trio, Chelsea have lost their last 3 away games.

AWAY%20GAMES%20COMPLETED.png


Whether its Luiz that is high or Cahill that is deep, there does seem to be an element of 'disconnect' between the average position of the center halves in the away game at Man City which is also evident in the home game against WBA. Given that Luiz plays on the left of the defence, which is the side they may attack more down (based on the average position of the left back which is higher than the right back i.e. this player is higher as they are on the attack more down this side), it is not unreasonable that Rafa would look to tightened things on that side in away games by bringing in Terry or Cahill. As mentioned above, if Luiz does play in away games, its been the case recently that Ivanovic will switch to right back to replace Azpilicueta which I would view as a stronger defensive option.
Here is an example of the tactical discipline of Hazard in a recent home game vs Sunderland and then away at City. In the Sunderland game, his heat map shows a roaming player. Whereas the City game shows a player more disciplined in holding his position on the left.

Hazard%20AVERAGE%20POSITION.JPG

CAVEAT: On a neutral pitch at Wembley against Man City, Benitez did field Azpilicueta & Luiz in the same defence and his 3 attacking midfielders (Oscar, Mata and Hazard) so he is not totally adverse to the idea of playing a more open game against tough opposition away from Stamford Bridge.

Rafa on rotation;
If ever a question was right up somebody’s street it’s the one the photographer asks Rafa Benitez: an innocent inquiry into the science behind rotation. “Wait,” Benitez beams, barrelling off to fetch his MacBook and a bulging wallet of papers. He produces a printout demonstrating how a player’s output declines by game three of any sequence of matches.


One thing that the above analysis has highlighted is that Chelsea's squad permits such rotation, whereas in recent games, Liverpool's ability to change it has become more and more restricted. Lately, the main decision has been which 3 of Coutinho, Sturridge, Henderson or Downing should start. After that, does Carra keep his place over Skrtel. Chelsea on the other hand can rotate every position on the pitch - though the one player they should avoid rotation is Juan Mata.

Juan Mata
Mata's position has changed in the past year. He was largely played on the left under Villa Boas, but was shifted into a central attacking midfield role under Di Matteo. In the FA Cup Final last year, Jay Spearing was pitched against him and was overrun with Mata winning the Man of the Match award. After Spearing's miscontrol, Mata picked up the stray ball, drove into the space and slipped the ball down the side of Enrique for Ramires to get in for the 1st goal. Since Rafa has come in, Mata has been encouraged even further forward;
"With Rafa, I'm playing more like a striker still, which has given me the chance to add more goals and assists. He's always telling me to push forward, forward, forward"

Mata has 10 goals and 10 assists so far in the league this season with 8 of his goals coming in away games. He is almost like the orchaetrator within their team as he has made more passes than anyone else in the team. Almost 50% more than Ramires who has played the same no. of games as him and almost 50% more than Lampard & Mikel (though they haven't played as many games). He also has more assists than any other player in the league. Here is one of his finer assists this season in the FA Cup against United. As Ba makes his move, he clips the ball over 3 midfielders and into the space behind Ferdinand.

1.%20Mata%20vs%20United.png


Mata has the 3rd highest chance conversion rate in the league. He has attempted 38 shots in the league so far this season, 22 of these shots have hit the target, an average shot accuracy of 58%. Just under half of these on target attempts have ended up in the back of the net, scoring 10 times in the league. A chance conversion of 26.3%. He has contributed 31% of Chelsea's away goals. Also worthy of mention is his playing partner, Eden Hazard who has 8 goals and 8 assists in the league.

Squad & Subs
In the last 6 Premier League games, Rafa has used all his 3 subs. The last time Rodgers used all 3 subs was 7 games ago when Liverpool were grandstanding against Swansea in the 5-0 win - unfortunately Borini got a season ending injury in that game which cut down the managers options to rotate or use him as a sub. I think this highlights the lack of depth in Rodgers squad.

Their line-up
We are used to Rafa as manager adapting his team based on the relative strengths & weaknesses of the opposition. Consequently, the following line-up tries to take this into account. As much as anyone can guess at Rafa's line-up, I will guess as follows;

Cech
Ivanovic Terry Luiz Cole
Mikel Lampard
Ramires Mata Hazard
Ba

My line of thinking is as follows;

  • Defence Cole should be available but its probably too soon for Cahill. Working on the assumption that both Luiz & Azpilicueta won't start together, Terry can play right side of CB with Luiz at left side and Ivanovic out to right back.
  • Mikel is the most disciplined of the options at DM and we tend to go through the middle alot. Also, it frees up Ramires to play at RM.
  • Ramires can operate on their right (our left) which is a dangerous side for us with Enrique, Coutinho and generally Suarez drifting out there. Ramires's work rate could help disrupt our game from that side whilst also being a threat on the counter attack. It was from this position that he broke to score the opening goal in the FA Cup Final last year.
  • Hazard generally starts games left of the trio but is strong on both feet. He could start left to try exploit any spaces left by Johnson and its also Carra's side which might be more susceptible to a creative attacking player like Hazard.
  • Ba is a presence and someone that can be hit from wide areas. If Chelsea aren't linking well in midfield, there is always the option to try and pop it into him.
In the graphic below, you can see that Torres has 7 goals and 7 assists from 2,194mins of Premiership football whereas in 2,190mins of Premiership football, Ba has 15 goals and 3 assists. Overall Torres has 17 assists with Ba only 4 (though substantially less games). This probably highlights a difference in style between the 2 players in that Torres may drop deeper & wider at times for the team.
Torres%20v%20Ba.JPG


http://roryfitz9.webnode.com/news/liverpool-vs-chelsea/
 
On current form Mata is going to rip Lucas a new one.
I expect Chelsea to have 8-12 free kicks from the edge of our box.
 
Good article as always Rory. That Hazard heat map sort of dispels the idea in the average positions that they play pretty narrow though?
 
Good article as always Rory. That Hazard heat map sort of dispels the idea in the average positions that they play pretty narrow though?

When a player drifts from one wing to another - his average position is likely to show as central. As I said above, this 'central' position should not be taken literally but as evidence of how fluid they are at moving across the pitch.



Whilst Chelsea's best attacking players have a propensity to come in-field, I would not take the graphics literally (i.e. that they are always standing on each others toes). I think the graphics above highlight a certain tactical fluidity at home. By allowing them to float & interchange in these areas, the average position of each player is almost the same.

And by almost the same - I am referring to their central position.
 
I'm not disputing your article at all mate, it's very good. I just think we'll see the fuckers try and get at us down the sides with players like Hazard and Mata, and Rafa will be only too aware that our full backs dont particularly enjoy defending. I'm sure they do like going through the middle, but they'll defo try and pull us apart wide.
 
I'm not disputing your article at all mate, it's very good. I just think we'll see the fuckers try and get at us down the sides with players like Hazard and Mata, and Rafa will be only too aware that our full backs dont particularly enjoy defending. I'm sure they do like going through the middle, but they'll defo try and pull us apart wide.

Absolutely, I agree with you.They will look to get at us wide, I just don't want some people to see an 'average pitch position' and think all the Chelsea attackers stay in the center of the pitch bumping into each other 🙂

You've picked up on a good point about our full backs. I am going to post a formation later from 'left field' that will look to specifically address this issue.
 
An addition;

Our line-up - Orthodox

Reina

Johnson Carra Agger Enrique

Gerrard Lucas Henderson

Downing Suarez Coutinho
  • Given Chelsea’s system, I think we need 3 in midfield so Henderson to start.
  • I don’t see us starting with both Suarez and Sturridge. More protection could come from 2 ‘widemen’.



Our line-up – Unorthodox
Reina

Skrtel Carra Agger

Lucas

Johnson Gerrard Henderson Enrique

Sturridge Suarez
  • Rodgers went 3 at the back at Stamford Bridge. If we want to mitigate against the attacking tendencies of our full-backs and let them do what they do going forward, we could give extra protection at the back.
  • We would then have a midfield 5 which could still cope with Chelsea’s system but give our full/wing backs more licence especially Enrique and Suarez to link up on the left.
  • It also permits 2 strikers and give Sturridge a chance to play against his former team.
 
12721343.png


John Terry made 26 passes with a completion rate of 88%

David Luiz attempted the most passes by a Chelsea player vs Fulham (49) but had the 2nd worst completion rate at 61%. Generally in a team the keeper has the worst completion rate due to goal kicks and long kicks and Cech had a rate of 57%.

If Terry is pressed, he'll shift it simple or hit a safety ball, if Luiz is pressed, he could do anything including trying to slalom his way out of trouble. If Suarez is going to be a nuisance to someone in the back line, I'd pick Luiz. The graphic shows someone with an eye for an ambitious pass. Even if he does hit nearly half them astray, it only needs one to pick out its man. He might be a little less inclined to hold on to the ball with Suarez near him, but its David Luiz so .................
 
Enjoyable read as always Rory.

Q. I'm assuming those Ba stats include his Newcastle games ? In which case they could be a bit misleading and just highlighting his performances for Chelsea a better indicator.
 
Fear the worst. Mata and Hazard would wreak havoc because we look really vulnerable when opposing players get between our midfield and defence.
 
Enjoyable read as always Rory.

Q. I'm assuming those Ba stats include his Newcastle games ? In which case they could be a bit misleading and just highlighting his performances for Chelsea a better indicator.

Yeah, they include Newcastle, I wanted to show them over the same no. of games. Ba has scored 5 goals at Chelsea so far. 4 in the FA Cup and 1 in the league vs West Brom
 
The gap and issue we're having between midfield and defense is a fair point, it's been there all season. When we played them at the Bridge we were quite organised and dropped in well to deny them space, something we've failed to do against practically everyone else all season. Then we threw on Suso and opened up a bit more and put them on the back foot, so it's difficult to tell which is the best way to go, I think we should just come out fighting from the word go, close them down and get hold of the ball. Easier said.
 
View from a Chelsea fan - I particularly like the bit about Benitez bowing to the opinion of the media 😀


We dropped points against liverpool at home when in fact we should have won. We have to make ammense and try and go for all 3 points. Liverpool always seem to step up when they play us so we must be at our best.

The key is to keep Suarez and Gerrard quite, if we can keep them out of the game we will steam roll them. But the crowd an Anfield will be initimidating so there is a very strong chance we wil draw this. I've already come to terms with dropping points againnst Liverpool and Man U in our remaining few matches, a win at Anfield will be a bonus in our quest for top 4.

We must start the game a lot better than we stated against Fulham, we were quite lucky Luiz scored out of nothing really, we can't rely on special moments like that because they are hard to come by. I hope Cole returns because every time Bertrand gets the ball I get nervous.

I don't think Terry or Lampard will start, Terry might if the media puts pressure on Benitez but doubt it. I feel Terry and Lamps should start because they know how to play in these rival games.

Oscar will come back into the side, possibly even Mikel for Lampard, Ba and Azpi.

Liverpool are without Sterling, Allen, Borini and Kelly for this match.
 
[quote="mark1975, post: 913003, member: 48"]Third time lucky Rory!Three strikes and you are out Rory![/quote]
 
Hopefully the Chelsea fans give the respect to the minute silence that Ann Williams deserves, if not it could get very ugly.
 
BIB theory line up:

Reina, Wisdom, Skrtel, Carra, Enrique, Lucas, Gerrard, Shelvey, Coutinho, Downing, Suarez

Can't be right. It's based on those wearing orange bibs.
Johnson, Agger, Sturridge wore green bibs.
 
Hopefully the Chelsea fans give the respect to the minute silence that Ann Williams deserves, if not it could get very ugly.

I thought it was a minutes applause? It's for the Boston marathon victims too, so even if it is a silence I doubt it'll be marred.
 
Hopefully the Chelsea fans give the respect to the minute silence that Ann Williams deserves, if not it could get very ugly.

Its a minutes applause because the silence would never have been observed. The club are also 'tagging' the Boston bombing to this 'applause' though which is strange.

Applause for Anne Williams is more fitting than silence.
For bomb victims, silence is more appropriate than applause but should it be done at Anfield ?
 
Its a minutes applause because the silence would never have been observed. The club are also 'tagging' the Boston bombing to this 'applause' though which is strange.

Applause for Anne Williams is more fitting than silence.
For bomb victims, silence is more appropriate than applause but should it be done at Anfield ?

Yeah, I don't agree with doing it for both. It is a tragedy but I feel it takes away from honouring a true hero who deserves a place in our memories.

I'm sure Anne herself would believe in honouring all the fallen in Boston too though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom