
Kerkez and Szobo had better games overall. The bias for him is pretty clear 😉lol some have Salah MOTM and others not even in the top three having won and scored the penalty to put the game to bed. This after a sublime assist and a constant threat down the right.
The bias against one of our greatest ever players is nuts 😅😅😅😅
Goals decide games. He was the difference maker and even if you want to argue he wasn’t top 2 to not have him top 3 is hilarious shite.Kerkez and Szobo had better games overall. The bias for him is pretty clear 😉
Given you selectively quoted the BBC headline in your Salah thread, here’s the BBC match report online fan rating list for the game…lol some have Salah MOTM and others not even in the top three having won and scored the penalty to put the game to bed. This after a sublime assist and a constant threat down the right.
The bias against one of our greatest ever players is nuts 😅😅😅😅
Given you selectively quoted the BBC headline in your Salah thread, here’s the BBC match report online fan rating list for the game…
Player of the match
Number: 8 D. Szoboszlai
Average rating8.47![]()
Number: 8 D. Szoboszlai
Average Rating: 8.47
Number: 6 M. Kerkez
Average Rating: 8.10
Number: 17 C. Jones
Average Rating: 8.02
Number: 11 Mohamed Salah
Average Rating: 7.98
…and on
Funnily enough that’s how I’d have it except for putting Kerkez (who was incredible throughout, assisted the crucial opener and was voted LFC Carlsberg player of the match) first. Szobo scored a cracker and ran the midfield, whilst Jones was excellent out of position and scored the opener with a great run and tricky finish. Mo had his best game in ages and took the pen well, but there was a marked difference between a frustration first half and much better second.
Yeah but you're kicking off in a thread where people pick their best 3 players from the game....and then say "yeah, there probably were 3 better players objectively"The question was whether Salah played well as it wasn’t clear from our own match thread.
Not who else played well.
If the journo paid to objectively rate the game and called out Salah when his own fans can’t it clearly speaks to a negative bias.
Where did I say objectively? I said the complete opposite. Objectively from the BBC (not fans) Salah was no1.Yeah but you're kicking off in a thread where people pick their best 3 players from the game....and then say "yeah, there probably were 3 better players objectively"
Picking a top 3 wasn't easy today, and immediately you're on the "HAHAHA BIAS" train
it's weird
Where did I say objectively? I said the complete opposite. Objectively from the BBC (not fans) Salah was no1.
The only thing weird is the hate Salah gets on here. In fact weird doesn’t even do it justice.
There’s your bias again…’objectively’ the BBC did not state Salah was no.1 - a headline that states ‘Salah shines’ only equates to “they’re stating he’s no.1” in your confirmation bias…care to consider that the headline is driven by his news currency and the comparison with his recent performances?Where did I say objectively? I said the complete opposite. Objectively from the BBC (not fans) Salah was no1.
The only thing weird is the hate Salah gets on here. In fact weird doesn’t even do it justice.
