
Wirtz
Ekitike
Frimpong
Luckily I only saw the first half, so I'll go with this.Wirtz
Kerkez
Jones
I think you are going to ruin Wirtz’s sweep.Frimpong - not much quality but the only one providing width
Wirtz - decent except he should have stopped the equaliser at source
Kerkez - decent offensively despite Gakpos best efforts
Jones did ok. Ekitike looked sharp but his inappropriate shooting gets on my tits. Virgil, Konate, Mac, even Szobo looked a bit wobbly.
Some people have a clear bias against a player, so ignoring a single vote when a player otherwise has a clean sweep is far fairer. As in blind bids where the top and bottom bids are excluded. It's happened 2-3 times this season with certain players.I think you are going to ruin Wirtz’s sweep.
+1Wirtz
Kerkez
Jones
I also reviewed the goal again, which supposedly he should have stopped.Some people have a clear bias against a player, so ignoring a single vote when a player otherwise has a clean sweep is far fairer. As in blind bids where the top and bottom bids are excluded. It's happened 2-3 times this season with certain players.
The single dissenting vote should be disregarded and the player should get the bonus points.
It ended up being two votes but this has happened plenty of times in the past. Nobody came up with clear bias back then. Al does list Wirtz second place so I don’t really see a problem with his votes.Some people have a clear bias against a player, so ignoring a single vote when a player otherwise has a clean sweep is far fairer. As in blind bids where the top and bottom bids are excluded. It's happened 2-3 times this season with certain players.
The single dissenting vote should be disregarded and the player should get the bonus points.
