• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Now that Lucho's gone…

Wouldn't disagree with that but I reckon we may find it harder to replace him than some posters think, as I'm not really convinced by our current options for the left-hand side of the front line. Sometimes you don't know what you've got till it's gone.
Well he was gone from the left for the majority of last season I think (wasn’t it less than ten games he started on the left?), so we already saw how we perform without him really. I’m excited to see what Ekitike does on the left, as well as a hopefully improved Gakpo.
 
Well, it's his best position and we always knew we'd get 100% commitment from him at the very least. As of today we have no idea how Ekitike will perform there (if he does play there) and, as you yourself point out, we'll need more from Gakpo there than he showed when he got the chance last season. I'm not saying it'll all go wrong, but for me the jury's definitely out on whether we can even replace Diaz there, let alone improve on him.
 
Like Mane, he was a proper "two-way" player -- did his work up front while also willing to knuckle down and help close down and win the ball at the back then carry it back up. His control was pretty amazing as well. A proper good player for us who deserves a tribute video put up by the club:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFVX-Jd_PWg

Good luck to him, and look forward to him frolicking in the wide open spaces behind Trent in their CL games.

p.s. If only Nunez had more of Diaz's ability in timing runs, spatial awareness and finishing technique.
 
They'll be plenty of times I him, but given the summer spending, his desire to leave and the clubs inability to get him to sign a deal, this is exactly the sort of proactivity we were looking for admidst all the other contract sagas. That always carries some risk, however given the sizeable upgrades happening throughout squad, we are well placed to go into the season with a drop off at LW.

I'd still welcome is flogging Chiesa and Elliott and signing a forward that can play both sides. If Diaz isn't directly replaced then it's a huge display of faith in young Ngumoha, which is exciting in itself.
 
524634367_1208717204633496_46669841761661403_n.jpg
Nice message, but I doubt he wrote a word of that. Reads like typical AI-generated text.
 
Wouldn't disagree with that but I reckon we may find it harder to replace him than some posters think, as I'm not really convinced by our current options for the left-hand side of the front line. Sometimes you don't know what you've got till it's gone.

100%. We lost a lot of trickery. I also think the language thing makes it hard for a player to bond with a place. Not sure he or Darwin really bothered to learn the lingo.
 
Most top level players obviously use PR agencies for this sort of thing. His just seems to be a particularly lazy one
I think even the PR firm was using AI. Many rarely write their own content anymore - at least other than some minor tweaking.
 
100%. We lost a lot of trickery. I also think the language thing makes it hard for a player to bond with a place. Not sure he or Darwin really bothered to learn the lingo.
Ekitike and Rio look like they have a LOT more trickery in their feet. And at least equal pace if not more.

I'm coming around to this being an upgrade.
 
Ekitike and Rio look like they have a LOT more trickery in their feet. And at least equal pace if not more.

I'm coming around to this being an upgrade.

Also looks like Ekitike at least understands the offside concept as well.
 
This is fascinating stuff from @Bayern Space - the person who gave the scoop that Wirtz's negotiations with Bayern would amount to nothing and he was firmly joining us.

The Diaz transfer
 
From inside Bayern, there is quiet recognition that the Luis Díaz transfer was orchestrated entirely on Liverpool’s terms, with Bayern left to follow along. Richard Hughes controlled the negotiations from start to finish, setting the framework early and never letting go of the upper hand. On Bayern’s side, Jan-Christian Dreesen led the talks but lacked the authority, leverage, or instinct to shape the deal in any meaningful way.

Hughes quickly secured clear signals from the Díaz entourage that the player would be open to a move to Saudi Arabia in the near future. Armed with that assurance, Liverpool insisted on a significant sell-on clause that would allow them to benefit substantially from any future transfer. Bayern, facing internal pressure to deliver a name and lacking serious alternatives, accepted the structure as it was presented.

The final agreement includes a base fee of 72 million euros, with a further 9 million in add-ons that are considered so easily achievable that the full 81 million is already being treated as a formality. With the sell-on clause factored in, the total fee Liverpool could receive may rise to 95 or even 100 million euros if a high-value transfer occurs, which is viewed internally as a likely outcome.

Inside Bayern, there is no denial of how the deal played out. While the move is being presented publicly as a strong signing, those involved know exactly how the negotiations unfolded. Liverpool dictated the terms, protected their future interests, and extracted maximum value. Bayern, on the other hand, paid heavily, agreed to a structure they did not design, and came away with a player who may already be positioned for resale.

It was, in every sense, a deal done on Liverpool’s terms.
 
Back
Top Bottom