Much clearer !

Much clearer !
He may or may not have been offside but you certainly can’t distinguish that from Brizzle’s photo because you can’t even determine who played the pass!! The ball’s already in the air and left the passer about 50 hours ago.Whether it's in the air or the centre circle (and you can see it) he's offside. Konate's Red would have been rescinded on VAR review.
Hang on - see my post below. WTF is going on !
You can clearly see who played the pass and ball is just feet from his foot - Look at the stances of the other players, they are not those of a player that has just kicked the ball.He may or may not have been offside but you certainly can’t distinguish that from Brizzle’s photo because you can’t even determine who played the pass!! The ball’s already in the air and left the passer about 50 hours ago.
But that means no McMananam or Ferdinand. So there’s that.
I recorded the game and still have it on Sky+. The freeze frame in this thread where he looks offside is a separate incident (it's not even the same player passing the ball and he's in his own half in the correct one, in our half in the incorrect one). The one embedded in the tweet is the correct one and Barcola was onside when the ball was played. I thought on first viewing that he was off, but during the game itself they didn't display the wide angle when the ball was played (they cut to it a fraction of a second later, when he looked offside) and they didn't show the wide angle in the (in-game) replays either, it was only when TNT showed the full wide-angle footage at half-time that you could see it properly, and he was on, no question.Whether it's in the air or the centre circle (and you can see it) he's offside. Konate's Red would have been rescinded on VAR review.
Happy birthday for yesterday!I recorded the game and still have it on Sky+. The freeze frame in this thread where he looks offside is a separate incident (it's not even the same player passing the ball and he's in his own half in the correct one, in our half in the incorrect one). The one embedded in the tweet is the correct one and Barcola was onside when the ball was played. I thought on first viewing that he was off, but during the game itself they didn't display the wide angle when the ball was played (they cut to it a fraction of a second later, when he looked offside) and they didn't show the wide angle in the (in-game) replays either, it was only when TNT showed the full wide-angle footage at half-time that you could see it properly, and he was on, no question.
I'm obviously not complaining about the decision, but we got away with one. If the ref had called it as a foul he'd have been off, and if the situation had been reversed I'd have been wanting a red.
Cheers bud, given that they didn't announce the 115/130 ruling it looks like the odds have swung back against the cheating bastards.Happy birthday for yesterday!
