Video technology
- Thread starter Hansern
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
It was bloody close if it wasn't - it's tough to tell.
This site is going to be great over the next few hours!
Yup ... as I said, it's much closer than those who're saying "GOOOOAL" and those who are saying, "NO way you queefs." It was close, and as the linesman wasn't 100%, he did the right thing.
Exactly.
It wasn't given, so it doesn't matter. I'm not bemoaning that incident at all.
I don't agree. They bossed us first half, we battered them second half. A draw at 90 mins would have been a fair result.
to be fair i was being a bit overzealous with the queef comments, my first post on it was that the decision could have gone either way and neither team could have really had any complaints
Yah - that's why I'm not pissed Lewy ... It was so close. It would have been nice if they'd had given it to us, b/c we'd have won but hey, that's the breaks.
Anyone see how Torres behaved?
But it's our problem again... How many chances did we create? Carroll goal and cechs worldy were all I can think of.
You don't create chances you don't score
Carroll had another chance and Terry put a great block on, Skrtel had a great chance blocked. Henderwanl had a couple of half chances, Gerrard had a volley....
We had chances mate.
We showed soul second half. I like that.
Andy Carroll comes away with more credit than anyone.
My one small rant. Enrique is shite.
Ive thought it for a while. I still do.
We had chances mate.
We showed soul second half. I like that.
Andy Carroll comes away with more credit than anyone.
My one small rant. Enrique is shite.
Ive thought it for a while. I still do.
There's actually only one camera angle that can really help judge these things and that's one built into the crossbar. We never do need camera technology for the balls that bounce a foot or two inside because any linesman should see it. It's ironic that it's the absolute howlers of decisions are the ones that galvanise the calls for new technology, when it's actually cases like today that really show the need for it.
I don't think it was in.
It wouldn't have been an injustice if we had scored and taken it into extra time.
Fabio should not be listen to as his sense of reason is being clouded by the thought of loving he will receive much later in the evening.
It wouldn't have been an injustice if we had scored and taken it into extra time.
Fabio should not be listen to as his sense of reason is being clouded by the thought of loving he will receive much later in the evening.
I think we did enjoy enough to get to extra time, but I can't complain that we didn't.
Liverpool manager Kenny Dalglish maintains the FA Cup match officials should 'get the credit they deserve' after replays were unable to prove that Andy Carroll's header had crossed the line against Chelsea at Wembley.
Dalglish admits his initial reaction was that the goal should have been awarded but concedes he has not seen the incident again since.
"There's no television in there so I don't know I haven't seen it," Dalglish told ITV.
"I thought it'd gone in but that's not me judging if it's gone over the line or not. If it hasn't gone over the line then I'll give the officials the credit they deserve.
"I've not seen it bounce I've not seen where it landed or whatever. I'm working on the presumption that some people might have given it some wouldn't. If it had of gone in who knows what might have happened, but it didn't.
"It's one of those, it could have been called either way."
Chelsea raced into the lead after 11 minutes through Ramires before doubling their tally after the break through Didier Drogba.
Dalglish claims his players were aware of Chelsea's game plan but admitted Roberto Di Matteo's side were the stronger side for the majority of the tie.
"They were better than us for the first hour," said Dalglish.
"They scored a goal and then suddenly get a great block from a volley from Craig Bellamy immediately after it. We finished fairly strongly after going 2-0 down and if we started the way that we finished we may be a bit happier than we are now.
"Certainly they played the way we expected them to play, just sit, well, take it off us counter attack come at us, and that's what they did."
Despite the defeat, Dalglish was buoyed by his side's response after going two goals behind and feels Liverpool could have secured a different outcome if they started stronger.
"We'll assess the season at the end of the season," he said.
"I think that we finished the game very strongly and had we gone into the game with that pace and commitment then we might have got a better score."
The England international had provided a lifeline for Liverpool after netting in the second half to cut Chelsea's two-goal advantage but saw his subsequent header from a Luis Suarez cross clawed from underneath the bar by Petr Cech.
Dalglish admits his initial reaction was that the goal should have been awarded but concedes he has not seen the incident again since.
"There's no television in there so I don't know I haven't seen it," Dalglish told ITV.
"I thought it'd gone in but that's not me judging if it's gone over the line or not. If it hasn't gone over the line then I'll give the officials the credit they deserve.
"I've not seen it bounce I've not seen where it landed or whatever. I'm working on the presumption that some people might have given it some wouldn't. If it had of gone in who knows what might have happened, but it didn't.
"It's one of those, it could have been called either way."
Chelsea raced into the lead after 11 minutes through Ramires before doubling their tally after the break through Didier Drogba.
Dalglish claims his players were aware of Chelsea's game plan but admitted Roberto Di Matteo's side were the stronger side for the majority of the tie.
"They were better than us for the first hour," said Dalglish.
"They scored a goal and then suddenly get a great block from a volley from Craig Bellamy immediately after it. We finished fairly strongly after going 2-0 down and if we started the way that we finished we may be a bit happier than we are now.
"Certainly they played the way we expected them to play, just sit, well, take it off us counter attack come at us, and that's what they did."
Despite the defeat, Dalglish was buoyed by his side's response after going two goals behind and feels Liverpool could have secured a different outcome if they started stronger.
"We'll assess the season at the end of the season," he said.
"I think that we finished the game very strongly and had we gone into the game with that pace and commitment then we might have got a better score."
That attitude won't sell you any shit newspapers
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
