I thought Keita was pretty good. Some stats to back up the visual impression:
I thought Keita was good yesterday, especially early on - he probably faded second half. But I doubted my thoughts as cleverer people than me were saying he was shite in the match thread
I enjoyed Salahs performance yesterday, not his best obvs, but he was trying, and pulling off, lots of cute little flicks and tricks. I like Salah when he's like that, when he's confident, he's deadly, just what I want to see going into the City game.
I thought Keita was pretty good. Some stats to back up the visual impression:
Re Salah not passing (again!), presumably people have noticed that this happens way more when he's not scoring.
That's not a coincidence by any means, he desperately wants a goal, & he'll snatch at every half chance he can get to do so. If he gets it, then he'll most likely find his scoring boots again, so it's perhaps not the worst thing in the world.
It seems very clear that unless we are desperate for a goal then two of our midfielders are told to be the midfield fulcrum, to sit and distribute, with the third more advanced and given more freedom, whether that is Hendo (not very good at this to my mind but he does have the legs to get back) or Ox.Keita has the most pretty dribble on our team, that's for sure. He looks like he should be amazing. He's also better at carrying the ball than the rest of the midfield.
But our midfield three isn't structurally that expressive, and it has lots of defensive obligations to fuel how we play. Structurally it has to be disciplined, and it's clear that the primary purpose when we are on the ball is to circulate play, hold the ball, and crucially be ready to win the ball back and close space very quickly. More complicated interplay, especially centrally, is secondary. That's for the forwards. The trick, and no one has figured it out consistently yet, is to know when you can afford to have a bit more freedom and aggression. That is only going to happen with some consistency, so that the fullbacks particularly understand the midfielder on their side of the pitch. If both commit forward, we're one long ball away from conceding a chance.
That's in every one of our midfielders minds. Once we have some rhythm, they can do that more naturally, and figure out when to be a little looser. I hope we get there. I really hope Keita gets there. As enjoyable as it is to watch him run with a ball, I think Ox smashing them in is just a little bit better.
I'm definitely in the minority with Salah, and for some reason have never embraced him as a forward to the extent that I probably should have, but I think he's actually becoming a problem. He makes our team slightly lopsided, and it's only worthwhile if he's doing more in attack. When Suarez had off periods, he worked harder, but that's not in Salah's game. When Mane isn't on form, he helps his fullback. When Salah isn't on form, we finish less chances, AND give the opposition more.
There are a select few in this side who are allowed by klopp to regularly lose possession.I'm far more annoyed by his shit passing, than his not passing or his desire to score. He misplaces more simple passes than anyone else on the team. Not threading the needle passes that might result in a goal, but a side footed 10 yard pass that keeps an attack going.
I'm definitely in the minority with Salah, and for some reason have never embraced him as a forward to the extent that I probably should have, but I think he's actually becoming a problem. He makes our team slightly lopsided, and it's only worthwhile if he's doing more in attack. When Suarez had off periods, he worked harder, but that's not in Salah's game. When Mane isn't on form, he helps his fullback. When Salah isn't on form, we finish less chances, AND give the opposition more.
Re Salah not passing (again!), presumably people have noticed that this happens way more when he's not scoring.
That's not a coincidence by any means, he desperately wants a goal, & he'll snatch at every half chance he can get to do so. If he gets it, then he'll most likely find his scoring boots again, so it's perhaps not the worst thing in the world.
I enjoyed Salahs performance yesterday, not his best obvs, but he was trying, and pulling off, lots of cute little flicks and tricks. I like Salah when he's like that, when he's confident, he's deadly, just what I want to see going into the City game.
Perhaps we need to recallibrate how performances are judged? A player is often pigeon holed on this forum. What is considered neat and tidy to some is considered laughable and invisible to others. If a player has contributed to us winning a game as being a sum of the parts then I'm usually okay with that. It would be amazing if all players could have an 8 or 9/10 performance each match day but we are always going to witness average 6/10 performances from a host of players. Unless its a big European night, we spanked City and it's 10's all round.
I've always enjoyed Brendan's rating as they have grown to become a part of forum culture but I never see the point in making my own as I'd be plucking arbitrary numbers out of the sky. I know Brendan has his 'system' (extra point for a goal scored) but I've never agreed with some of the scoring. For example, when Frimino plays below his usual standard and gets a 3. Or Gini getting a 3 or 4 for just keeping it neat and tidy. I'm all for Gini to assert himself more and some of his performance are immediately forgettable but I would still factor in the fact he has still performed a secondary role in a game we've won. That's not a 3. It's a 6 no? A 3 is having a full blown Lovren vs Spurs.
Keita is the latest victim it seems in a skewed rating system. He's a 4 for some, 6/7 for another. Do we factor in the fact he cost 50 million and we expect more? Obviously it's all down to opinions but bias for and against makes a match rating system a bit redundant IMO.