• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Stadium 'news' from Mr 'Going Forwards' Ian 'Hot' Ayre

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's one thing I sympathise with FSG: everyone else thinks of all the years that this saga has been going on, but they've had to start from fresh and get used to all of the byzantine details and debates, and if a decision is now close that strikes me as the result of a pretty prudent and careful process. I'll be very pleased if the stadium is redeveloped.
 
I'll be furious if the new Main Stand doesn't have bunker boxes, though. They sounded well ace.
 
Much as I'd love us to have a beautiful, new stadium, if it makes little financial sense to build a new stadium with slightly increased capacity, then I'm not too bothered. I'd rather we try and close the gap on match day revenue and continue growing financially to aid in our quest for the title.
 
Aye, the Allianz in brilliant, because it actually looks like a football ground. It might just be some kind of optical illusion, but it seems like the stands are really close to the pitch as well; the one thing I really hate about new grounds in England is how far away the stands have to be from the goals. I'd have thought that was an a EU wide thing, but maybe it's not.
 
LIVERPOOL FC has been given until the end of the month to make its mind up over whether to move to a new stadium or stay at Anfield.

The ECHO can reveal Liverpool council has given the club the deadline in the hope of ending months of uncertainty over owner John W Henry’s plans for the club’s stadium requirements.

But the club may be moving towards finally confirming Mr Henry’s preferred option of remaining at Anfield.

The council’s assistant director of regeneration Mark Kitts has revealed the local authority’s own plans to regenerate the local area would enable the redevelopment of Anfield stadium to go ahead.

The city council has already announced plans to demolish homes near to Anfield in Lothair Road, which it insists are in no way connected to any decision that the club may or may not take.

Mr Kitts said: "We have been working with the club very closely and they have said this will accommodate their needs if they stay at Anfield and refurbish the current stadium."

The main issue standing in the way of the Reds expanding Anfield has been the "right to light" of nearby residents.

Mr Kitts has said that the demolitions would solve those issues.

Today Liverpool council was keen to stress that its plans to regenerate Anfield are not linked to those of the club.

A spokesman said: "No decision has yet been made by Liverpool Football Club about their stadium plans. The city council continues to work closely with the club, but the club will determine which option is best for them.

"The city council plans to demolish and refurbish properties in the surrounding streets to Anfield stadium are about driving forward much needed housing renewal in the area.

"They are not indicative of any decision Liverpool Football Club may or may not make in relation to their stadium."

The council controls the lease of Stanley Park – where the club still has the option to build a new ground – and would also be needed to drive forward any Compulsory Purchase Orders the club would require if they prefer redevelopment.

Although keen to leave the club to manage its own affairs, the council believes it has already shown patience and is eager to see progress. Last week club managing director Ian Ayre said the Reds were getting close to making a decision but were continuing to explore both options.

The fact there has been no solution some 20 months after Fenway Sports Group’s takeover is a source of frustration for supporters.

Publication of the club’s accounts last month highlighted that the failure to relocate to a new stadium during the previous regime of Tom Hicks and George Gillett had left Liverpool with a bill for £49.6m.

Hicks and Gillett had vowed to have ‘a spade in the ground within 60 days’ following their arrival in February 2007 but it never happened. Their expensive plans have since been written off Planning permission still exists to build the stadium designed by Manchester architects AFL but obtaining a lucrative naming rights deal is crucial to subsidising the £300m project.

Mr Ayre said talks with interested major companies are ongoing, while Liverpool are also continuing to assess whether refurbishing Anfield to a 60,000 capacity is financially viable.



LIVERPOOL FC managing director Ian Ayre insisted there was no guarantee the club would be staying at Anfield despite being issued with an apparent ultimatum by the city council.

The ECHO revealed yesterday authority bosses have given the Reds until the end of the month to confirm whether it would be building a new stadium or pressing ahead with a redevelopment of its current home.

But Ayre said there remains plenty of work to be done before the club is in a position to make such an announcement.

Mr Ayre said: “The situation hasn’t changed. We have been engaged in dialogue with local residents, and with the council, but that is to do with a redevelopment programme being run by the council which we, as major stakeholders, have an interest in.

“Does it mean we are staying at Anfield? No it doesn’t. We are on record as saying we would love to do so. But it is by no means certain. We cannot say with certainty we will be staying at Anfield.

“Promises have been made and not kept in the past. We are working daily to move forward. But we cannot make any certain statements at this point.”
 
I'm not, however my statement would just change to

60,000 seats, new corporate/money making seats, staying at Anfield, for free, how can you be unhappy?


Best reply i have seen to an argument in this forum....simple, non-confrontational, and absolutely murdered the counter point!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom