1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
    Dismiss Notice
Why Not Register?

It only takes a few minutes to register on SixCrazyMinutes

Click Here

VAR

Discussion in 'The Football Forum' started by binomial, Sep 17, 2019.

  1. binomial

    binomial Very Active Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2016
    Messages:
    3,720
    Likes Received:
    265
    Trophy Points:
    235
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Mother fucking bull shit.

    Might as well not be there, hasn't overturned 1 fucking bad decision this season and looks more to rule out legitimate goals when no one appeals.

    Fucking bollocks.

    Fuck off
     
  2. binomial

    binomial Very Active Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2016
    Messages:
    3,720
    Likes Received:
    265
    Trophy Points:
    235
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    I think the rules need to be re-explained because no one seems to understand what they are, are they being made up as they go along?

    For me, if a player initiates contact with the defender (Callejon on Robbo perfect example) for me is NOT a foul and therefore CANNOT BE A PENALTY.

    Slow the tape down and what'll you fucking see if Robbo pull his left leg clearly away from the man before he falls starts to fall kicking Robbo's standing foot in the process.

    How can no mother fucker or his dog see that?
     
  3. moron

    moron i am legend Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Messages:
    6,312
    Likes Received:
    930
    Trophy Points:
    400
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Essex
    Because the mother fuckers are blind baby !!!
     
  4. Markeh

    Markeh Very Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    14,186
    Likes Received:
    3,398
    Trophy Points:
    765
    They are masters

     
  5. binomial

    binomial Very Active Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2016
    Messages:
    3,720
    Likes Received:
    265
    Trophy Points:
    235
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    So var in Chelsea Valencia game.

    Doesn't send Coquelin off for a dangerous tackle.

    And awards Chelsea a pen for a ball that hits the defenders hand despite it being by his side and about a metre away?

    Fantastic.

    Keep going VAR
     
  6. Mersey86

    Mersey86 Unknown Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,571
    Likes Received:
    498
    Trophy Points:
    435
    Seriously.  That is disgusting.  I'd rather go out than support a team which had that mentality.
     
    Stevesquash likes this.
  7. tombrown

    tombrown Very Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    8,453
    Likes Received:
    7,008
    Trophy Points:
    870
    Location:
    Corofin, Co Clare
    I have made my peace.

    I can live with the impact (or, more accurately, lack of impact) VAR is having on our season, so long as it continues to impact City in the League & Champions League as it has so far
     
  8. Whaddapie

    Whaddapie Very Active Honorary Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Messages:
    6,497
    Likes Received:
    522
    Trophy Points:
    380
    Location:
    A Dub in Dallas
    VAR correctly ruled out a goal that would have otherwise stood and given City two points that they shouldn't have gotten...  

    It's not all bad.  Though it hasn't help us directly this season, it has it's place is utilised correctly.  Which it hasn't been yet this season.  Yesterday really annoyed me...
     
    Insignificance and Modo like this.
  9. Modo

    Modo A contentious scando Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    42,266
    Likes Received:
    7,010
    Trophy Points:
    1,460
    Gender:
    Male
    VAR also knocked City out in the CL
     
  10. Hyena

    Hyena Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,321
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    Trophy Points:
    545
    Gender:
    Male
    I seem to recall this...But I can't be bothered to remember teams that didn't make it past the quarter finals.
     
    Ukrainian by marriage likes this.
  11. Insignificance

    Insignificance Bad to the bone Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    13,820
    Likes Received:
    2,493
    Trophy Points:
    625
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    Well, technically as it was the quarters, one of the teams involved made it past the quarters.
     
  12. hmmmmm1

    hmmmmm1 Very Active Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    Messages:
    9,675
    Likes Received:
    668
    Trophy Points:
    350
    That 2 minutes from sterling scoring and the goal being disallowed was entertainment.
     
    momoWASboss likes this.
  13. Hyena

    Hyena Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,321
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    Trophy Points:
    545
    Gender:
    Male
    One of them was Spurs. The other is now a footnote.
     
  14. King Binny

    King Binny Very Well-Known Honorary Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Messages:
    17,416
    Likes Received:
    5,017
    Trophy Points:
    970
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Singapore
  15. Modo

    Modo A contentious scando Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    42,266
    Likes Received:
    7,010
    Trophy Points:
    1,460
    Gender:
    Male
    VAR helped us win against Chelsea. No problem with it whatsoever.
     
    Hyena likes this.
  16. RedStar

    RedStar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Messages:
    5,021
    Likes Received:
    966
    Trophy Points:
    440
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    Its shite, not the tool, but the application of if. The idea that you would spot an error, then take the time to clarify that it was a mistake and then not bother to correct it because it wasnt clear and obvious enough at the time is so stupid that it has to have been done on a bet.
     
    momoWASboss likes this.
  17. juniormember

    juniormember Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    7,991
    Likes Received:
    2,272
    Trophy Points:
    660
    Gender:
    Male
    They have enough money to use 100fps cameras. FFS a GoPro can film at 240fps.
    Seems like such an easy solution.
     
  18. momoWASboss

    momoWASboss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2006
    Messages:
    4,334
    Likes Received:
    2,259
    Trophy Points:
    610
    This is exactly it. A player going down before contact and conning the ref isn’t a clear and obvious error? We’ve been done twice by that.
     
  19. FoxForceFive

    FoxForceFive Administrator Administrator

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Messages:
    71,715
    Likes Received:
    17,554
    Trophy Points:
    2,240
    Gender:
    Male
    That's not the issue, not really, or not the entire issue.

    You'd need to get all the tech upgraded to transmit & broadcast images at that frame rate.

    That is possible currently, as there's no demand for higher frame rates ( its way more important than higher resolution to your average viewer, but of course it's harder to sell so they don't actually know that) & frame rates aren't uniform anyway (24fps for film, & some adverts, 60fps for US content & much overseas content, which includes a lot of adverts as well as anything filmed there, & 50fps for UK content & our adverts) so the equipment being used has to be made to spec if those higher rates are needed.

    Now that's all possible (it's what they'll use in the broadcast centres), but then you'd have to have people to isolate the exact frame in a quick enough time to then get the decision in a reasonable time frame (forgive the pun), & which frame that needs isolating would be key to the decision, so it would need to be someone very quick & technically proficient with the editing software, plus they'd need to able to decide which frame was the relevant one, so they'd need to be a referee, or a partnership between two such individuals, which would inevitably push the time more.

    Basically, it's not feasible imo, at all, despite the fact that eventually you'd get a more accurate decision, it'd be a lengthy one, & would still be fallible due to the human aspect of which frame would be relevant & when that phase of play started.

    I suspect the answer is much more simple, & involves creating a margin of error greater than the frame rate error margin, & eventually scrapping the phase of play part of the rule.

    Which is ironic, cos if you do both of those I reckon a linesman gets the call right at least 99 times out of a 100 anyway, making VAR pointless!
     
    darkstarexodus likes this.
  20. binomial

    binomial Very Active Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2016
    Messages:
    3,720
    Likes Received:
    265
    Trophy Points:
    235
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Yeh no problems with it last night.

    been a mess on other times, did you think it was ok for the Napoli game too?
     

Share This Page