• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Agent Fees To Be Capped

Status
Not open for further replies.

bluebell

Well-Known
Member
[article]
FIFA to implement a 10% cap on agent fees

BY SCORE AND CHANGE · PUBLISHED DECEMBER 16, 2021 · UPDATED DECEMBER 16, 2021

Football-field-line-1024x682.jpg

FIFA plans on capping agent fees at three percent of a player’s salary and 10 percent of the transfer fee. It is part of FIFA’s new Football Agent Regulations that will take effect in 2022 and aim to provide a fairer and more transparent system.
Transfers surrounded by mystery and high agent costs

A cap on agent fees is not a surprising move. Some might say it is long overdue. With the general feeling being that the amounts paid on intermediary fees, whether those are for agents, parents or other representatives, are excessive and far from transparent.
For instance, major controversy arose from Paul Pogba’s €100 million transfer from Juventus to Manchester United in 2016. The Football Leaks operation reported that agent Mino Raiola received a €49 million fee for representing all three sides in the deal. It led to inquiries by FIFA.
Another controversy came with the transfer of Neymar Jr. from Santos to FC Barcelona in 2013. It turned out the initial reported £48.6 million was far lower than the true cost of £71.5 million revealed later by Barcelona president Josep Maria Bartomeu. The deal included a £33 million compensation fee paid to Neymar’s father, in addition to a £2 million fee for acting as his agent.
$500.8m spent on agent fees in 2021, a 110% increase since 2014

These amounts seem outliers, but are part of a market where clubs are willing to pay big money for players and therefore for intermediaries. According to a 2021 FIFA report, clubs paid a total of $3.5 billion for intermediary service fees between 2011 and 2020.
Moreover, the amount has increased significantly in recent years. In 2021, clubs spent $500.8 million on agent fees according to another report by FIFA. A 110 percent increase compared to the $239 million spent on such fees in 2014.
And if it had not been for the dampening effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the increase would likely have been higher. Before the pandemic-related financial challenges came along, spending on agent fees amounted to $654.7 million in 2019.
More regulations concerning agents

A cap on agent fees is part of a wider, ongoing process by FIFA to reform the Transfer Matching System (TMS) in order to ‘protect the integrity of the system and prevent abuse’. It is not the only regulation change concerning agents. FIFA will also limit multiple representations as to avoid conflict of interest. This comes after earlier changes such as a reintroduction of a mandatory licensing system for agents, a resolution system to solve disputes between agents, players and clubs and that all agents’ commission must be paid via the FIFA Clearing House.
Taking back control over the intermediary market

In effect, these are all proposals and regulations to take back (some) control over the intermediary market. From the 17,945 international transfers of male players only 19,8 percent involved at least one intermediary in 2021. Yet, with a size of half a billion dollars, it is a market FIFA would like to have (financial) control over. By having payments going through FIFA Clearing House – initially set up to effectively ensure the payments of the Solidarity Contribution and Training Compensation – the governing body will achieve just that.
Will cap on agent fees lead to legal battles?

For some agents these regulations will have an immediate impact on the amount of their commissions. Hence, they will likely take legal measures against FIFA’s latest plans. This poses the question whether FIFA’s regulations go against the European Union’s free market principle? In other words, does a cap on agent fees prevent free movement of capital and labour? It is an interesting legal question, especially since European clubs account for the majority (95.8%) of the $500.8 million spent on agent fees. And a timely one, with the next transfer window taking place in January.
[/article]
 
Agents are player agents and not club agents (for the most part). I never understood how they could be billing clubs percentages from transfer fees. They should only be allowed to bill their clients (players) to help manage their lives and sponsorship deals. It’s crazy what they get away with.
 
Will be a long court case before it actually happens.

How can FIFA enforce it?
As long as clubs abide by the laws, WTF are agents going to do?
To ask for 30-50% of the transfer fee value is pure parasitic. 10% is still huge.
Mani Riola can fuck off!
 
As long as clubs abide by the laws, WTF are agents going to do?
To ask for 30-50% of the transfer fee value is pure parasitic. 10% is still huge.
Mani Riola can fuck off!

Completely agree, but what if the clubs don’t. Or the agents sue FIFA for price fixing and collusion. I could see both of those preventing it actually happening.
 
Completely agree, but what if the clubs don’t. Or the agents sue FIFA for price fixing and collusion. I could see both of those preventing it actually happening.
@Rosco you're a lawyer, what case do Agents have to demand as much as they do (if you don't know, no worries) ? From a fans pov, they're parasites to demand as much as they do.
Haaland transfer stinks of pure greed to demand 2/3 of the transfer value.
 
Wonder what impact is there to us since we generally have one of the highest agent fees paid.
 
Wonder what impact is there to us since we generally have one of the highest agent fees paid.
It wouldn’t have any impact if it became a level playing field. In fact we could probably offer the players themselves more money.
But it won’t be a level playing field. Clubs will still find ways to bribe agents behind the scene.
 
@Rosco you're a lawyer, what case do Agents have to demand as much as they do (if you don't know, no worries) ? From a fans pov, they're parasites to demand as much as they do.
Haaland transfer stinks of pure greed to demand 2/3 of the transfer value.

what? Two thirds? Seriously?
 
So imagine you’re Mo Salah’s agent right now. You could have a 3% commission if you agree a new deal with Liverpool. So if you get him £500k per week for 4 years, you get £3m.
Or you could broker a deal to take him to PSG for £100m transfer fee, and you get £10m.
What are you going to do?
If they bring this in it will have a huge impact on the game.
Or the only way to avoid it will be by bending the rules. Which would totally happen.
 
It wouldn’t have any impact if it became a level playing field. In fact we could probably offer the players themselves more money.
But it won’t be a level playing field. Clubs will still find ways to bribe agents behind the scene.
Because some clubs will break the rules, isn't a reason not to put a cap in. Just have to punish those that break the rules.
 
So imagine you’re Mo Salah’s agent right now. You could have a 3% commission if you agree a new deal with Liverpool. So if you get him £500k per week for 4 years, you get £3m.
Or you could broker a deal to take him to PSG for £100m transfer fee, and you get £10m.
What are you going to do?
If they bring this in it will have a huge impact on the game.
Or the only way to avoid it will be by bending the rules. Which would totally happen.
PSG could offer £50m in agent fees right now, there's nothing we can do about that.
Saying that an agent has to do what's right for his client, and in Mo Salah's case it's staying at LFC
 
I'm surprised that there is no 'tax' on player signings that takes a cut that goes to the FA of either that player's home nation, or to the FA of the club that sells him. Easy way to fund grassroots, or other things that are underinvested in e.g. good referees.
 
I'm surprised that there is no 'tax' on player signings that takes a cut that goes to the FA of either that player's home nation, or to the FA of the club that sells him. Easy way to fund grassroots, or other things that are underinvested in e.g. good referees.
That’s been tabled by the supporters federation or something like that. Straight away it was shut down by a few people in the game. The same people that don’t seem to mind paying over to the employees of players.
 
Horrifically greedy and corrupt organisation takes steps to stifle other horrifically greedy and corrupt organisations and individuals
 
I wonder whether the real concern is money laundering and whether capping agent fees minimises the risk. It's the focal point of the investigations into Juve.

That Juve stuff is even under investigation in Ireland because one agent involved has Irish based companies
 
I wonder whether the real concern is money laundering and whether capping agent fees minimises the risk. It's the focal point of the investigations into Juve.

That Juve stuff is even under investigation in Ireland because one agent involved has Irish based companies
Guess who is knee deep in Juventus's transfers of late?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom