If anyone wants to know @peterhague mother's maiden name DM me.
Big D vs Twitter
- Thread starter Mors
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
So he typed stuff into Chrome and then Chrome turned his words into things he didnt actually type and made out like he was defending pedos.
And now that more evidence has come out that the pedos were doing pedo things he comes out and says someone hacked his account.
An open mind reveals all sorts of explanations.. but it doesnt explain chrome typing stuff in that he didnt say.
I will say though, when he posted shocking it did feel different from his usual takes on here.
Anyways. Pls change your password Peter.
I'm probably nieve, but I think it's ok for people to change their mind, claim what they said wasn't what they meant etc. It doesn't necessarily make them a less reliable witness (or poster).
I wholeheartedly agree.
At what point does the wider mechanism in the US recognise this behaviour is not acceptable and the standards of the office of president is being severely undermined.
He probably passed that point a while ago.
I want to ridicule but (a) it’s not funny and (b) reform
They (Levitt) defended the post and attacked the media initially. The post was then deleted, and they are now blaming some staffer that randomly posted it on Trump’s account. In the middle of the night. And remained there for 12 hours until the backlash was too great even for this administration.Meanwhile, Trump's latest post on his own social media platform (yes he really did)
As if it wasn’t Trump that posted it. It’s so Trump.
It's like they think they can change their story multiple times and then blame an un-named "staffer" for this and then Trump's magically not a racist.
Did a staffer tell him Nigeria was a shithole country?
That Somalians are garbage?
That there were good people on both sides in Charlottesville?
etc.
Fuck's sake.
Did a staffer tell him Nigeria was a shithole country?
That Somalians are garbage?
That there were good people on both sides in Charlottesville?
etc.
Fuck's sake.
I don't know that this is a new low tbh.
Lots of replies saying Starmer is in there... Just not 38k times... and not accused of anything.
Supposedly in the less redacted version of the files that congress has been given access to at DOJ, he's mentioned over 1 million times. That's according to one of the congressmen that searched through the files. Crazy.
I think that figure will likely prove to be an exaggeration (and that fact will then be used to defend him as "he's only in there 100,000 times, not over a million" like 100,000 (or whatever the actual figure is) is somehow OK). The congressman (Raskin) only had an hour or two to look at the unredacted files so he will have to fall on generalisations and stats. If Trump is mentioned prolifically then the law of averages says the incriminating stuff will be hard to find if you only have access for a couple of hours as a lot of the mentions will be fairly benign.
But what was apparent from what Raskin said is that Trump is mentioned in the unreleased files far more regularly than in the ones that are public domain, which will only fuel the suspicion that the DoJ is suppressing material that would be embarrassing / incriminating to the actual President of the USA.
Jagland, a former Prime Minister, Foreign Minister and secretary general of the Council of Europe has been charged over here.
Økokrim has now opened an investigation into former Prime Minister, Chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee and Secretary General of the Council of Europe Thorbjørn Jagland on suspicion of aggravated corruption.
- We consider there are reasonable grounds for investigation, given that he held the positions of chair of the Nobel Committee and Secretary General of the Council of Europe during the period covered by the released documents, says Pål K. Lønseth, Director of Økokrim.
Among other things, Økokrim will investigate whether gifts, travel and loans were received in connection with his position.
Process for waiving immunity
Since Jagland has immunity as a former head of an international organization, Økokrim has asked the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to take the initiative to lift his immunity.
Økokrim continues to look into on the material in the Epstein files.
- Regarding other parts of the material, we will revert to that at a later stage. As the material is extensive the assessment will take some time, says Lønseth.
The immunity has been waived btw. There are some insane stories developing over here.
Økokrim has now opened an investigation into former Prime Minister, Chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee and Secretary General of the Council of Europe Thorbjørn Jagland on suspicion of aggravated corruption.
- We consider there are reasonable grounds for investigation, given that he held the positions of chair of the Nobel Committee and Secretary General of the Council of Europe during the period covered by the released documents, says Pål K. Lønseth, Director of Økokrim.
Among other things, Økokrim will investigate whether gifts, travel and loans were received in connection with his position.
Process for waiving immunity
Since Jagland has immunity as a former head of an international organization, Økokrim has asked the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to take the initiative to lift his immunity.
Økokrim continues to look into on the material in the Epstein files.
- Regarding other parts of the material, we will revert to that at a later stage. As the material is extensive the assessment will take some time, says Lønseth.
The immunity has been waived btw. There are some insane stories developing over here.
