[quote author=Fabio link=topic=44968.msg1354952#msg1354952 date=1308997067]
[quote author=Modo link=topic=44968.msg1354949#msg1354949 date=1308996624]
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=44968.msg1354944#msg1354944 date=1308995916]
[quote author=Modo link=topic=44968.msg1354942#msg1354942 date=1308995802]
my bad regarding Keane.
£24 Million got us Torres.
[/quote]
an unproven striker with an average scoring ability compared to someone who had been the top british scorer for the years previous
Ive said it before and i'll say it again, at the time i wanted us to get bent
[/quote]
I wouldn't say that Torres was unproven. I mean he was one of the top rated strikers in Spain. But sure he was unproven in the premiership. We could say the same about someone like Villa.
[/quote]
Torres was highly rated, but he never showed great ability in spain. Villa (since he was at gijon) was a goal scoring machine. Villa moved to valencia for 9m. Bargains can be had but i'm sure if we compare goal scoring between villa and Torres at similar ages villa will batter Torres.
Bargains can be had and yes, villa would have been a steal at the time, but bent was still a safer, cheaper option at the time
[/quote]
That I can agree with, though I never really rated Bent.
Just to be clear
Villa:
Gijon (Second division)
2001-02 40 games 18 goals
2002-03 39 games 20 goals
Real Zaragoz (Primera)
2003-04 38 17
2004-05 35 15
2005-06 35 25
2006-07 36 16
Torres:
Athletico
2003–04 35 19
2004–05 38 16
2005–06 36 13
2006–07 36 14
To be fair they scored about the same amount of goals. Considering the age difference (Torres is three years younger), while Villa was scoring in the second division, Torres was scoring about the same amount in the primera league at the same age.
[quote author=Modo link=topic=44968.msg1354949#msg1354949 date=1308996624]
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=44968.msg1354944#msg1354944 date=1308995916]
[quote author=Modo link=topic=44968.msg1354942#msg1354942 date=1308995802]
my bad regarding Keane.
£24 Million got us Torres.
[/quote]
an unproven striker with an average scoring ability compared to someone who had been the top british scorer for the years previous
Ive said it before and i'll say it again, at the time i wanted us to get bent
[/quote]
I wouldn't say that Torres was unproven. I mean he was one of the top rated strikers in Spain. But sure he was unproven in the premiership. We could say the same about someone like Villa.
[/quote]
Torres was highly rated, but he never showed great ability in spain. Villa (since he was at gijon) was a goal scoring machine. Villa moved to valencia for 9m. Bargains can be had but i'm sure if we compare goal scoring between villa and Torres at similar ages villa will batter Torres.
Bargains can be had and yes, villa would have been a steal at the time, but bent was still a safer, cheaper option at the time
[/quote]
That I can agree with, though I never really rated Bent.
Just to be clear
Villa:
Gijon (Second division)
2001-02 40 games 18 goals
2002-03 39 games 20 goals
Real Zaragoz (Primera)
2003-04 38 17
2004-05 35 15
2005-06 35 25
2006-07 36 16
Torres:
Athletico
2003–04 35 19
2004–05 38 16
2005–06 36 13
2006–07 36 14
To be fair they scored about the same amount of goals. Considering the age difference (Torres is three years younger), while Villa was scoring in the second division, Torres was scoring about the same amount in the primera league at the same age.