it’s more of a market thing imo i’m not sure there are that many non skint clubs with a needGakpo is worth quite a lot. He regularly score goals. He often drives us crazy, but we will definitely make a profit on him.

it’s more of a market thing imo i’m not sure there are that many non skint clubs with a needGakpo is worth quite a lot. He regularly score goals. He often drives us crazy, but we will definitely make a profit on him.
He's imposing himself more, and that's an excellent place to startI've been such a Grinch lately so it's time to say something positive.
Wirtz is improving.
Mitigating circumstances.He's imposing himself more, and that's an excellent place to start
I was always confident he'd be good for us, just a shame it took til now for him to make more of a difference
This has been done to death. I think it's more that they didn't want to offer him a huge new contract (and Bayern did) and the offer from Bayern was really good for a player of his age. Pure economics rather than any dislike of Diaz as a player. Our failure (Slot's failure) was relying on Gakpo to replace him full time.Haha, some seemed to conveniently forget the top footballing people in the club sold him. I guess they are haters too.
The SCM hindsight captains are always right obviously.
Well, the newly minted management team, the one that is top of the world at that point, went out and bought the best player in Germany, one of the best young strikers playing in Germany, the best 9 in the Premier League for an excess of 300m. On paper it should more than compensate for an aging LW who was more effective playing as a 9. We bought two top class 9s to replace him after all!
Of course 6 months on, it hadn't worked out, they should rightly be responsible for it. But let's not pretend to know any better when we are simply typing on the keyboard.
Well, the newly minted management team, the one that is top of the world at that point, went out and bought the best player in Germany, one of the best young strikers playing in Germany, the best 9 in the Premier League for an excess of 300m. On paper it should more than compensate for an aging LW who was more effective playing as a 9. We bought two top class 9s to replace him after all!
Of course 6 months on, it hadn't worked out, they should rightly be responsible for it. But let's not pretend to know any better when we are simply typing on the keyboard.
Not sure you understand the definition of fact.I wonder about the last bit. Leaving aside Diaz's one pathological hater on here, my impression is that most of us are aware of the loss involved and the fact - because it IS a fact - that we haven't addressed it adequately yet. I'd like to see Chiesa given a run in that position personally.
And on a similar note, we need to stop keeping fringe players around for too long.
Nat Phillips was 27 when he left us and had made 39 appearances. He was never going to make it.
WTF is Kaide Gordon still doing at the club? A handful of appearances and for my money he's looked bang average every time. I personally would add Bajcetic to the list too. Not going to make it here. Owen Beck is 23 - is he the succession plan for Robbo? Fuck me.
City have sold loads of players in recent years better than all of them and they are a far more attractive proposition to a young kid as a result - come to us, you'll get your chance and if it doesn't work out we won't stand in the way of you going somewhere else to make a name for yourself (have a word with Cole Palmer if you don't believe us). Go to Liverpool and they'll keep you languishing in the reserves (where you'll get handed your arse on a plate every week because your team-mates are all shite) or maybe on loan at Wigan/Preston/Blackburn, or somewhere else where they live on pies and keep whippets, in the forlorn hope you might suddenly become a superstar overnight when no-one is looking.
If you're really lucky, you might come back and get to sit on the bench and keep Rio company as the pair of you watch your team-mates collapse defensively every week while the manager (sorry, "head coach") plays some other bugger out of position because he doesn't trust you, even though you're a specialist in that position.
Or if you're luckier still, you lose a couple of headers in the first game of the season against a battling championship team like, say, Ipswich, you get subbed off at half-fucking-time and then singled out in post-match interviews for criticism by the "head coach" and then barely kick a ball (when you do, confidence destroyed and match sharpness lacking, you don't fully do yourself justice) and then you are sold off to Leverkusen with a buy-back clause that you'd have to be fucking mad to allow the club to exercise. Only when you leave the club do you get the senior England cap you clearly deserved a couple of seasons before.
Fuck that shit.
I'm not the one making snide digs at people who have other opinions on Xmas day. Based on Diaz of all people, who had left 6 months ago. Get over it for goodness' sakes.This is just silly. He was never more than a stand-in no.9 and none of "the best player in Germany", "one of the best young strikers playing in Germany" or "the best 9 in the Prem" that we bought was a LW. As for your final sentence, try telling the guy you see in the mirror every morning.
Not sure you understand the definition of fact.
I'm not the one making snide digs at people who have other opinions on Xmas day. Based on Diaz of all people, who had left 6 months ago. Get over it for goodness' sakes.
That's a weird way of looking at it
Not sure you understand the definition of fact.
I don't agree. Not all attackers are interchangeable. Horses for courses.
Let's agree to differ. If (as you rightly say) they're not like for like I don't see them as replacements - additions, yes, but that's a different matter.
Not sure you understand the definition of "definition".
Or, (because 2 don't replace 1) :Nunez replaced by Ekitike and Isak
Jota - no one
Diaz - no one
Elliott - Wirtz
