• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Florian and the (Slot) Machine

Agree, which is why I don't share the view that he should start wide left. I want him starting centrally and going all over the pitch.
IMO he lacks the physicality when he plays in the midfield 3(i presume that's what you mean). makes us softer in the midddle. Playing further forward in the front 3 gives him more licence to roam and cause damage.
 
His most recent displays suggest to me that the physicality point no longer applies. He's been more prominent in the midfield battle recently and has put in a good few ball-winning tackles.

I can see how playing further forward might in theory free him up more, but that depends on whether we're happy to let Kerkez carry more or less the only threat we have on that side.
 
He looks to me like the old 2nd striker that teams used to play. Big man, small man. Or even the way Gerrard played with Torres.
We have a few players now who look like they would fit better in a 3-4-1-2 formation. The 4-1-2 bit I think we could do quite well, we don't have defenders for it though. Unless Gravy played as a sweeper.
Maybe wait till Xabi is here for that 🙂
 
He’s on his way.

I’m still open to Wirtz playing on the left wing in a free role, mainly because Gakpo has been poor, Wirtz and Kerkez connect well, and Szobo, Jones or Mac Allister alongside Gravenberch is a title-winning midfield. In ideal circumstances, Wirtz plays the position we signed him for every week, but right now, we need to keep some flexibility depending on fitness and form. Had we landed Semenyo, then it's a different conversation. Same too if Slot actually showed some faith in Ngumoha
 
On paper at least, this should have been a mouthwatering prospect, had Salah's decline not happened and Isak not got murdered:

----Ekitike-------Isak---------Salah----
-----------------Wirtz------------------

I still worry if we can play Salah and Wirtz in the same team. I worry if we can play Salah at all, but the two of them....
 
On paper at least, this should have been a mouthwatering prospect, had Salah's decline not happened and Isak not got murdered:

----Ekitike-------Isak---------Salah----
-----------------Wirtz------------------

I still worry if we can play Salah and Wirtz in the same team. I worry if we can play Salah at all, but the two of them....

This is still one attacker too many IMO for our current set up.

Isak will become a problem if he's fit again, because his fee suggests he should play but Wirtz & Ekitike are quietly becoming the best attacking pair in the league.

All we need to complement that is one other winger (maybe Salah with hunger back could still do that this season) and then a solid midfield & defence could see us in a really great place.
 
This is still one attacker too many IMO for our current set up.

Isak will become a problem if he's fit again, because his fee suggests he should play but Wirtz & Ekitike are quietly becoming the best attacking pair in the league.

All we need to complement that is one other winger (maybe Salah with hunger back could still do that this season) and then a solid midfield & defence could see us in a really great place.

We play 50-55 games per year though. Its madness to think that we don't need two quality strikers. They can even play together or Ekitike can play on the left if need be. The amount of games per striker wont be a problem.
And as we've seen this season, injuries happen. To both of them.
 
This is still one attacker too many IMO for our current set up.

Isak will become a problem if he's fit again, because his fee suggests he should play but Wirtz & Ekitike are quietly becoming the best attacking pair in the league.
I do not disagree, but it is a sad state of affairs for us to have the “best attacking pair in the league” and can’t win a game.
 
We play 50-55 games per year though. Its madness to think that we don't need two quality strikers. They can even play together or Ekitike can play on the left if need be. The amount of games per striker wont be a problem.
And as we've seen this season, injuries happen. To both of them.

I agree with the point but when you have top level players they want/need to know that they are *the* guy. They play differently (currently) and maybe that will change as I don't believe we have seen Isak look even 50% of the player he was at Newcastle yet. If there was a system that they could interchange in that would be the ideal, but our current situation doesn't offer anything resembling that.
 
He looks to me like the old 2nd striker that teams used to play. Big man, small man. Or even the way Gerrard played with Torres.
We have a few players now who look like they would fit better in a 3-4-1-2 formation. The 4-1-2 bit I think we could do quite well, we don't have defenders for it though. Unless Gravy played as a sweeper.
Maybe wait till Xabi is here for that 🙂
A sweeper? Return to the stone age to resurrect an obsolete role to play every team's striker onside not to mention a complete and utter waste of Gravenberch's ability?
 
We sold/loaned 6 members of the first team squad, 8 if you include Morton and Doak and then concentrated the funds largely on three attackers. Spaffing so much on Isak, after Ekitike and Wirtz were through the door, was senseless. That fee could have covered at least two or three positions.
 
Who would you play up front then if:

a) Ektike took time to adjust.
and if not
b) When he need rest or got injured.
c) or Eki just plays 55 games of course.
 
Back
Top Bottom