Barca have gone full on mental haven't they
Love to see it.
They are the cunts we accuse them of being.
How much of the Nico payoff will go to us to settle the Coutinho account?
Barca have gone full on mental haven't they
At the time (September 2023), the Dynasty investment was described as a minority investment in LFC (i.e. NOT in FSG, just us). The club's official website stated that "The minority investment will primarily be used to pay down bank debt incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic and capital expenses made to enhance Anfield, build the AXA Training Centre, repurchase Melwood training ground and, most recently, acquisitions during the summer transfer window."@Beamrider I hope you don't mind me asking and you don't mind answering...
The Dynasty Capital bought a small %of the club, where did that money go? I hear it was much as £160m? I thought it would be used to take all the intra company debt off the books. However, when I google, its shows the club still owes £70m to FSG. If you include intracompany debt and external debt, where does the club stand? With 3 windows of net 0 spending, in you're opinion does that mitigate the loss made when we didn't qualify for the CL?
Thanks for that, so are you saying the cash injection may not have happennedAt the time (September 2023), the Dynasty investment was described as a minority investment in LFC (i.e. NOT in FSG, just us). The club's official website stated that "The minority investment will primarily be used to pay down bank debt incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic and capital expenses made to enhance Anfield, build the AXA Training Centre, repurchase Melwood training ground and, most recently, acquisitions during the summer transfer window."
I don't dispute any of that.
The rumoured range of investment was between £64m and £128m - I'm guessing this is something dollar-related and the description of the investment may imply that range in US finance speak. I say that because it's a wide, but quite specific, range of values.
Bear in mind that the debt figures you mentioned are from the May 2023 accounts - so most of the capital expenditure had been spent, other than finalising Annie Road (although there could have been £20m+ still to spend to finish that project as the expenditure is often end-loaded into the close season and the contractor had gone bust).
The debt to FSG is, I believe, the residual debt from the Main Stand and we've not repaid any of that since 2020. If there is surplus cash on hand, they'll repay some of it, but if there is a need for investment in the club then they'll leave it outstanding.
The club's net debt per accounts at 31 May 2023 was £145m (£71.4m FSG, £87.1m bank, less £13.5m cash). The bank debt is typically quite low at the end of May as season ticket money for the following year has been collected. Over summer, the club still incurs most of its normal costs (wages and overheads) but there is not much match-related income. We will bill most of our sponsorship / partnership revenue for the following season to be paid in June so we can cover those costs - obviously the shirt sponsorship / kit deals will be chunky numbers.
The summer 2023 transfer window saw us sell Hendo and Fabinho, and buy Mac, Szob, Gravy and Endo. Given that Mac and Szob were on release fees, it's possible we would have had to pay the whole fee up-front, rather than just 1/3. That means in cash terms we may have paid out an extra c. £60m for them compared to a normal window (but then we'll have paid £30m less last summer and won't have a £30m payment due this summer either). That would have put a strain on bank facilities in 2023 and was probably what drove the Dynasty deal.
So Dynasty should have cured the shortfall in Autumn 2023, and we should now have more scope for outlay.
BUT - the Dynasty investment ought to have gone into LFC as a share injection. And if it had done, we should have made a filing with Companies House to record the share issue. We haven't done so. Nor has our holding company (UKSV Holdings). And neither company has recorded Dynasty as a shareholder. It's possible the Dynasty investment came in a level above (UKSV I LLC, a US company) but US companies don't publish their accounts publicly so I can't tell.
It's also possible that the club just forgot to file the relevant paperwork, and I genuinely would't rule that out.
Finally, with regards to the loss we will have made in 2024, I really don't think it will be that big a number. My best guess would be £30-40m. We will know soon as the club needs to file its accounts by 28 February.
But in summary, I think the main things holding us back from spending at the moment are the need to resolve the contract three and / or that the players we want / need aren't available and we're not going to settle for 2nd choices.
I don't think it's for a lack of money to spend, and I don't think there is soSme kind of financial conspiracy going on under our noses.
Thanks for that, so are you saying the cash injection may not have happenned
Do you know what ? I like not spending and winning, getting used to it now, hopefully we dont buy anyone in the summer.He’s saying “maybes aye… maybes naw”, no way to be sure, but don’t worry, we’ll have funds to spend in the summer one way or the other.
I don't doubt that the cash came in and I don't believe the club would have said what they'd spend it on if they didn't do that.Thanks for that, so are you saying the cash injection may not have happenned
Do you know what ? I like not spending and winning, getting used to it now, hopefully we dont buy anyone in the summer.
Fuck's sake man, get your act together.Apologies, a correction to my post yesterday. The net debt figures I gave were 2022, not 2023.
The 2023 figures are higher:
Bank £125.4m
FSG £71.4m
Cash -£3.4m
Net £193.4m.
Fuck's sake man, get your act together.
Thats what I saw.... Debts increased which is why i was asking where the cash injection had gone? if you are saying that FSG could have used the cash injection to plug the financial gap for not qualifying for Europe then it would manifest itself with the bank debt showing this as either being constant or lower right? Right now from what you can see you cannot see clear evidence of a cash injection from a 3rd party, right?Apologies, a correction to my post yesterday. The net debt figures I gave were 2022, not 2023.
The 2023 figures are higher:
Bank £125.4m
FSG £71.4m
Cash -£3.4m
Net £193.4m.
I don't pay my SCM exclusive top band platinum tier membership fees for this level of information.I know, right... joke.
The debt figures you saw were before the cash injection (accounts are to 31 May 2023, the Dynasty investment was September 2023, the day after the accounts were signed so it's not even mentioned, never mind accounted for).Thats what I saw.... Debts increased which is why i was asking where the cash injection had gone? if you are saying that FSG could have used the cash injection to plug the financial gap for not qualifying for Europe then it would manifest itself with the bank debt showing this as either being constant or lower right? Right now from what you can see you cannot see clear evidence of a cash injection from a 3rd party, right?
Thanks mate...The debt figures you saw were before the cash injection (accounts are to 31 May 2023, the Dynasty investment was September 2023, the day after the accounts were signed so it's not even mentioned, never mind accounted for).
The cash injection will be in the 31 May 2024 accounts, which are due to be filed on 28 February 2025, and will be available to the public a few days after that. There's usually a press release with key figures / spin at the time of filing.
Fixed.I don't pay a SCM exclusive top band platinum tier membership fee.
I am being serious - if that c*nt guy posts anything like "Here we go " - related to us getting in a new player - I am going to respond:You’ll ascend to levels of top redness that us mere mortals can only dream of.
transfer window is closed..... It was clear early on we would get no one. Right now its important to get Salah and VVD signed up. Come Summer, we know where stand.I am being serious - if that c*nt guy posts anything like "Here we go " - related to us getting in a new player - I am going to respond:
"Why have we signed someone ? - what's the point - mate (referring to player coming in) - can you just f*ck off ? we don't need you - if you are a:
option1: - defender just head to Arsenal, Arteta can't get enough of your kind.."
option2: - striker just don't go to Arsenal - they have striker allergy, don't goto Chelsea they will turn you into a dick, head to Spurs mate they just attack attack"
option3:- midfielder - head to City mate - they got no legs in midfield, they will love you"
option4:- CDM - ah - look you are definitely not the right player, we just love looking for a CDM' and not getting one, kind of like it now - not having one - so can you fuck off ?
Going down swinging of know they are ok?Yawn.
City have launched another challenge against the Premier League's associated party transaction rules.
Not shitting themselves.
Nope.
Not one bit.
Nothing to see here.