If we're using the Nunez or Diaz money for this then we've still got the Coutinho money for Isak so can't moan really.
Jesus wept. € 90 million for this gamble.
we spent that to suppress the john henry / jeffrey epstein photosThe Coutinho money was invested in Bitcoin. We’re loaded.
I doubt our super stats guys think it’s a gamble…more an objectively measured value, carefully monitored over time decision. Let’s hope they keep the good run going…Jesus wept. € 90 million for this gamble.
We don't know that yet.
KonateYeah, but we're also champions of England and signing top talents, so what the fuck else can we complain about?
Statistics damn lies and statistics... it doesn't show that those high turnovers seem to end in really shit quality shots, which is less impressive. But reading between the lines, it sounds like Ekitike is winning the ball back by himself and has no options on except a poor % shot.Just five teams saw a greater proportion of their high turnovers end in shots (16.7%), and only Borussia Dortmund (3.4%) and Bayern Munich (4.6%) had a greater share lead to goals than Eintracht 3.2%.
Nunez's figures weren't bad at all for minutes played (it's the misses that pissed everyone off) so a massive improvement is a bit hyperbolic. Nunez worked back too so Ekitike will have to work his socks off. Likely his all round play is much better and will suit the team more - but this is still a huge gamble. Age on his side.Yep, it feels like we're over paying by a good 30million, still no doubt he's a massive improvement on Nunez.
100% agree with you but there has to be a reason why they didn't go for either (pedro or Cunha). Considering how often they get it right, I am going to trust them. The Fee is large but it always going to be when you consider it was slip pickingsLet's be honest the fee is pretty ridiculous for a guy who scored 15 goals in a mediocre league. Joao Pedro at 60m is looking like more and more of a bargain.
Pedro stats from Transfermarkt:Let's be honest the fee is pretty ridiculous for a guy who scored 15 goals in a mediocre league. Joao Pedro at 60m is looking like more and more of a bargain.
This kind of proves my point.Well it doesn't always work in our favour. I mean it was a good job Caceido wanted to play for Chelsea above us otherwise we wouldn't have won the league, we'd have wasted a fortune, and the spreadsheet lads would have been getting pelters from all sides... Which is my worry with this dude, given the only reason he can possibly be worth the amount we've paid for him is that he's the perfect cog in this machine.
Transfermarkt always grossly undervalue players. I don't get where their values come from when it's obvious they are way way off the mark.FWIW Transfermarkt value Pedro at €50m and Ekitike at €75m, so looks like we're both being ripped off!
I think this is true and it's thanks to Klopp that this is the new mentality. Obviously everyone paused when Slot came in - was it the beginning of the end? Would the stars hang around? Well last season, and VvD and Salah signing new contracts at the end of it, dispelled any doubts.This kind of proves my point.
I think times have changed even in this very short space of time.
This time round all our targets want to play for us.
So €90m + €5m 😢The Times is reporting the fee as £78m plus £4.3m add ons.