Is the nuts.
Must start every game ahead of Johnson.
Must start every game ahead of Johnson.
Martin Kelly
- Thread starter Home and A Gay
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
I said this before anyone. I told you so.
42 out of 72 Glenjo's Liverpool appearances have ended in draw or defeat.
Sweet Jesus
Sweet Jesus
[quote author=Home and A Gay link=topic=47309.msg1417760#msg1417760 date=1319665041]
42 out of 72 Glenjo's Liverpool appearances have ended in draw or defeat.
Sweet Jesus
[/quote]
wow
42 out of 72 Glenjo's Liverpool appearances have ended in draw or defeat.
Sweet Jesus
[/quote]
wow
[quote author=Home and A Gay link=topic=47309.msg1417760#msg1417760 date=1319665041]
42 out of 72 Glenjo's Liverpool appearances have ended in draw or defeat.
Sweet Jesus
[/quote]
Really?? Have you just made that up?
42 out of 72 Glenjo's Liverpool appearances have ended in draw or defeat.
Sweet Jesus
[/quote]
Really?? Have you just made that up?
I was the first to say Johnson was a shite right back and a waste of money and that Kelly was better. Where are all the posters who said the opposite? Where are you cos I said the opposite. Told you so.
[quote author=Home and A Gay link=topic=47309.msg1417760#msg1417760 date=1319665041]
42 out of 72 Glenjo's Liverpool appearances have ended in draw or defeat.
Sweet Jesus
[/quote]
I'm surprised we've won 30.
He's been here since summer 2009, which only really vouches for Rafa's last season before he was sacked, and then Hodgson's freescoring wonders.
42 out of 72 Glenjo's Liverpool appearances have ended in draw or defeat.
Sweet Jesus
[/quote]
I'm surprised we've won 30.
He's been here since summer 2009, which only really vouches for Rafa's last season before he was sacked, and then Hodgson's freescoring wonders.
[quote author=Sheik Yerbouti link=topic=47309.msg1417768#msg1417768 date=1319665366]
I was the first to say Johnson was a shite right back and a waste of money and that Kelly was better. Where are all the posters who said the opposite? Where are you cos I said the opposite. Told you so.
[/quote]
i'm one of them. johnson has been shit for ages though.
I was the first to say Johnson was a shite right back and a waste of money and that Kelly was better. Where are all the posters who said the opposite? Where are you cos I said the opposite. Told you so.
[/quote]
i'm one of them. johnson has been shit for ages though.
In fairness you'd get a similar stat over the past while when he's not playing too.
[quote author=Sheik Yerbouti link=topic=47309.msg1417768#msg1417768 date=1319665366]
I was the first to say Johnson was a shite right back and a waste of money and that Kelly was better. Where are all the posters who said the opposite? Where are you cos I said the opposite. Told you so.
[/quote]
He isn't a 'shite' right back Sheik, he just can't defend very well. Some teams don't need a decent defender at RB.
Should be considered for the wing.
I was the first to say Johnson was a shite right back and a waste of money and that Kelly was better. Where are all the posters who said the opposite? Where are you cos I said the opposite. Told you so.
[/quote]
He isn't a 'shite' right back Sheik, he just can't defend very well. Some teams don't need a decent defender at RB.
Should be considered for the wing.
[quote author=Red Astaire link=topic=47309.msg1417767#msg1417767 date=1319665347]
[quote author=Home and A Gay link=topic=47309.msg1417760#msg1417760 date=1319665041]
42 out of 72 Glenjo's Liverpool appearances have ended in draw or defeat.
Sweet Jesus
[/quote]
Really?? Have you just made that up?
[/quote]
No it's true
[quote author=Home and A Gay link=topic=47309.msg1417760#msg1417760 date=1319665041]
42 out of 72 Glenjo's Liverpool appearances have ended in draw or defeat.
Sweet Jesus
[/quote]
Really?? Have you just made that up?
[/quote]
No it's true
[quote author=IanTheRed link=topic=47309.msg1417775#msg1417775 date=1319665557]
[quote author=Sheik Yerbouti link=topic=47309.msg1417768#msg1417768 date=1319665366]
I was the first to say Johnson was a shite right back and a waste of money and that Kelly was better. Where are all the posters who said the opposite? Where are you cos I said the opposite. Told you so.
[/quote]
He isn't a 'shite' right back Sheik, he just can't defend very well. Some teams don't need a decent defender at RB.
Should be considered for the wing.
[/quote]
I don't get this "he should play on the wing" argument. He played there a few times for Pompey but aside from that, he's been a right back his entire career for Club and Country.
[quote author=Sheik Yerbouti link=topic=47309.msg1417768#msg1417768 date=1319665366]
I was the first to say Johnson was a shite right back and a waste of money and that Kelly was better. Where are all the posters who said the opposite? Where are you cos I said the opposite. Told you so.
[/quote]
He isn't a 'shite' right back Sheik, he just can't defend very well. Some teams don't need a decent defender at RB.
Should be considered for the wing.
[/quote]
I don't get this "he should play on the wing" argument. He played there a few times for Pompey but aside from that, he's been a right back his entire career for Club and Country.
[quote author=IanTheRed link=topic=47309.msg1417775#msg1417775 date=1319665557]
[quote author=Sheik Yerbouti link=topic=47309.msg1417768#msg1417768 date=1319665366]
I was the first to say Johnson was a shite right back and a waste of money and that Kelly was better. Where are all the posters who said the opposite? Where are you cos I said the opposite. Told you so.
[/quote]
He isn't a 'shite' right back Sheik, he just can't defend very well. Some teams don't need a decent defender at RB.
Should be considered for the wing.
[/quote]
He is. I told you so. Wear it.
[quote author=Sheik Yerbouti link=topic=47309.msg1417768#msg1417768 date=1319665366]
I was the first to say Johnson was a shite right back and a waste of money and that Kelly was better. Where are all the posters who said the opposite? Where are you cos I said the opposite. Told you so.
[/quote]
He isn't a 'shite' right back Sheik, he just can't defend very well. Some teams don't need a decent defender at RB.
Should be considered for the wing.
[/quote]
He is. I told you so. Wear it.
[quote author=Gary25 link=topic=47309.msg1417779#msg1417779 date=1319665699]
[quote author=IanTheRed link=topic=47309.msg1417775#msg1417775 date=1319665557]
[quote author=Sheik Yerbouti link=topic=47309.msg1417768#msg1417768 date=1319665366]
I was the first to say Johnson was a shite right back and a waste of money and that Kelly was better. Where are all the posters who said the opposite? Where are you cos I said the opposite. Told you so.
[/quote]
He isn't a 'shite' right back Sheik, he just can't defend very well. Some teams don't need a decent defender at RB.
Should be considered for the wing.
[/quote]
I don't get this "he should play on the wing" argument. He played there a few times for Pompey but aside from that, he's been a right back his entire career for Club and Country.
[/quote]
But, he's a bit pants at defending in his preferred position.
However he has two feet, the best of which is his right, he is quite fast, can jink past people and can shoot well with his left. All this makes me deduce that, seeing as the toilet stealing tool is usually stuck on the edge of the opposition area when they lump the place he should be, is that he should be utilized at RW.
Dirk Kuyt, Jordan Henderson & Steven Gerrard aren't right wings either.
[quote author=IanTheRed link=topic=47309.msg1417775#msg1417775 date=1319665557]
[quote author=Sheik Yerbouti link=topic=47309.msg1417768#msg1417768 date=1319665366]
I was the first to say Johnson was a shite right back and a waste of money and that Kelly was better. Where are all the posters who said the opposite? Where are you cos I said the opposite. Told you so.
[/quote]
He isn't a 'shite' right back Sheik, he just can't defend very well. Some teams don't need a decent defender at RB.
Should be considered for the wing.
[/quote]
I don't get this "he should play on the wing" argument. He played there a few times for Pompey but aside from that, he's been a right back his entire career for Club and Country.
[/quote]
But, he's a bit pants at defending in his preferred position.
However he has two feet, the best of which is his right, he is quite fast, can jink past people and can shoot well with his left. All this makes me deduce that, seeing as the toilet stealing tool is usually stuck on the edge of the opposition area when they lump the place he should be, is that he should be utilized at RW.
Dirk Kuyt, Jordan Henderson & Steven Gerrard aren't right wings either.
Arrow fail.
[quote author=Shelvey link=topic=47309.msg1417826#msg1417826 date=1319696345]
Kelly is even a better attacker than Johnson. I enjoy Kelly in the side more than GJ in every way and I was one of the first to say it.
[/quote]
I don't think he's a better attacker at all, he's alot less technical and subtle once he gets in the opposition half, he can cut in and have a dig, but his attacking best comes when he has space to run into, he knocks the ball ahead of himself and chases it. Glen Jo has got two good feet, can dribble quite well, can cross and can score. He just can't defend.
Kelly is even a better attacker than Johnson. I enjoy Kelly in the side more than GJ in every way and I was one of the first to say it.
[/quote]
I don't think he's a better attacker at all, he's alot less technical and subtle once he gets in the opposition half, he can cut in and have a dig, but his attacking best comes when he has space to run into, he knocks the ball ahead of himself and chases it. Glen Jo has got two good feet, can dribble quite well, can cross and can score. He just can't defend.
[quote author=Ryan link=topic=47309.msg1417807#msg1417807 date=1319677309]
I still like Glenjo a lot and would happily see him play at RB for us.
Kells is the shit, no doubt, but Glenjo is a good footballer worth sticking with.
[/quote]
Agreed! I said early that Kelly will be the England rb but I didn't think he would be better than GJ already. Like them both.
I still like Glenjo a lot and would happily see him play at RB for us.
Kells is the shit, no doubt, but Glenjo is a good footballer worth sticking with.
[/quote]
Agreed! I said early that Kelly will be the England rb but I didn't think he would be better than GJ already. Like them both.
[quote author=keniget link=topic=47309.msg1417839#msg1417839 date=1319698166]
What's with this I said it first nonsense anyways?
What do you want, a medal?
As for the England RB, I think we'll have to start winning stuff otherwise Richards (who looks to have progressed a fair bit anyways) and Smalling will get picked ahead of him.
[/quote]
Plus Kyle Walker will be another English RB option.
What's with this I said it first nonsense anyways?
What do you want, a medal?
As for the England RB, I think we'll have to start winning stuff otherwise Richards (who looks to have progressed a fair bit anyways) and Smalling will get picked ahead of him.
[/quote]
Plus Kyle Walker will be another English RB option.
- Status
