From some lad who wrote a letter to Footy365.com:
There has been great discussion recently about Liverpool's supposed luck with the referees and penalties. Some would have us think that either Liverpool have been very lucky, or there is a grand conspiracy designed to being the title back Anfield. I'm not sure either is true. Lets play Rafa and look at some facts.
First, what I'm calling "Penalty difference (PD)".
Liverpool: Awarded 12, conceded 4. PD = 8
Manchester City: Awarded ,7 conceded 1. PD = 6
Chelsea: Awarded 7, conceded 0. PD = 7
Not a huge amount between them.
Now, lets look historically at the highest number of penalties in the league. Where there was a tie, I've gone with the highest PD.
2012/13: Chelsea, 11 (penalty difference of 10)
2011/12: Manchester United, 11 (PD of 8)
2010/11: Manchester City, 9 (PD of 5)
2009/10: Chelsea, 12 (PD of 7)
2008/09: Manchester City, 7 (PD of 3)
2007/08: Tottenham, 7 (PD of 6)
2006/07: Arsenal, 10 (PD of 8)
2005/06: Crystal Palace (!), 12 (PD of 7)
So have Liverpool had an abnormal number of penalties? It's high, but not what you'd call statistically significant. Is their PD high? Yes, but again, it's not abnormal compared with what has gone before.
Why so many penalties? It's very simple, they play very attacking, very quick football. They force teams into making mistakes because they're terrified of what is coming at them. Teams that attack and score lots of goals will win penalties. From my memory (which may be rose tinted) I can't remember any outrageous penalty decisions given to Liverpool. They've mainly been stonewallers or "I've seen them given."
There has been great discussion recently about Liverpool's supposed luck with the referees and penalties. Some would have us think that either Liverpool have been very lucky, or there is a grand conspiracy designed to being the title back Anfield. I'm not sure either is true. Lets play Rafa and look at some facts.
First, what I'm calling "Penalty difference (PD)".
Liverpool: Awarded 12, conceded 4. PD = 8
Manchester City: Awarded ,7 conceded 1. PD = 6
Chelsea: Awarded 7, conceded 0. PD = 7
Not a huge amount between them.
Now, lets look historically at the highest number of penalties in the league. Where there was a tie, I've gone with the highest PD.
2012/13: Chelsea, 11 (penalty difference of 10)
2011/12: Manchester United, 11 (PD of 8)
2010/11: Manchester City, 9 (PD of 5)
2009/10: Chelsea, 12 (PD of 7)
2008/09: Manchester City, 7 (PD of 3)
2007/08: Tottenham, 7 (PD of 6)
2006/07: Arsenal, 10 (PD of 8)
2005/06: Crystal Palace (!), 12 (PD of 7)
So have Liverpool had an abnormal number of penalties? It's high, but not what you'd call statistically significant. Is their PD high? Yes, but again, it's not abnormal compared with what has gone before.
Why so many penalties? It's very simple, they play very attacking, very quick football. They force teams into making mistakes because they're terrified of what is coming at them. Teams that attack and score lots of goals will win penalties. From my memory (which may be rose tinted) I can't remember any outrageous penalty decisions given to Liverpool. They've mainly been stonewallers or "I've seen them given."