I guess it does if you've won the PL title or the FA Cup. Probably a question for the lawyers...
So a ten game ban..
- Thread starter 6TimesaRed
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
No. Not at all.
He has Received a 10 game ban. Just because we are too shit to have anything to play for doesnt detract from the ban length.
Its a quarter of a season.
I bet the bookmakers are gonna take bets every year for a lengthy Suarez ban.
It's Suarez's third lengthy ban. Has anyone ever been banned that many times ?!
It's Suarez's third lengthy ban. Has anyone ever been banned that many times ?!
2 live crew.
Didn't he headbutt a ref and get a lengthy ban as a kid too? lol not that I'm doing any favours by saying that.
I thought the "law is an ass" ?
I'm confused..who is right? 6cm Andy or Facebook Andy ? Which one is the real Andy ????
It's a quarter over 2 seasons. Hence an eighth in a season.
I think the club should now preempt this & tell all the players if they do something similarly mad, then tell the ref if you're not sent off.
That way you get the 3 match ban only.
It's fucking ridiculous, but gets around this bullshit.
That way you get the 3 match ban only.
It's fucking ridiculous, but gets around this bullshit.
Both are right.
Both agree.
Both think its hard to argue with the ban.
Both think its hard to justify the disparity with other players.
The law is an ass because it follows exact wording over perceived justice. Hence, Ross is an......
I don't think he's a cunt or a dick, I think he's nsane when on the edge competitively. He might also be a cunt or dick in his spare time, though I doubt it involves biting.
I think off the pitch he's a lovely bloke, but on it he's competitive to the point of madness.
But allowing that to exclude him from being a dick I don't agree with.
If someone bit me or my son during a footy match I'd say he was a dick.
Ridiculous, and utterly predictable.
Not surprised in the slightest, did anyone expect anything less?
And no, there's absolutely no point in appealing it (if the intention is to get it reduced). From a symbolic point of view it might be worth it to highlight the ridiculousness of it, but it'll only give media twats more excuse to go off the deep end about it.
Suck it up and move on I reckon
Not surprised in the slightest, did anyone expect anything less?
And no, there's absolutely no point in appealing it (if the intention is to get it reduced). From a symbolic point of view it might be worth it to highlight the ridiculousness of it, but it'll only give media twats more excuse to go off the deep end about it.
Suck it up and move on I reckon
Hmmmm? Methinks there is something amiss here.
... Truth.
I like the sound of that but think its very unlikely
I wonder if the twats stuck the boot into souness etc? They're making out like it's the first time a liverpool player has ever misbehaved.
And as for lawrenson, he's dead to me.
Lawrensons hates us. The maudlin Prestonian cunt
I think 23 premier league goals this season actually makes it pretty easy to suggest we're getting value for money. Not forgetting his unbelievable work rate. Probably the best value for money we've gotten in years.
On Twitter most of the journos, pundits and players think its to much.
Dont think the FA will get much support for the length of the ban tomorrow.
Spot on. Not just his goals and assists but unbelievable workrate and never hides even when playing poor. He and gerrard are by far our best players and we'd be stupid to sell.
Fair shout.
Fucking journalists, they whip up the outrage over every little thing Suarez does. They couldn't be more hypocritical if they tried. Now they're using the ban length for something to write about and they're realising a genuinely entertaining and controversial player who generates countless headlines is going to disappear for a while and they're going to miss him.
- Status
Similar threads
-
- Locked
