Surely she get a good club gig after they win it.
Women’s World Cup
- Thread starter Dreambeliever
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
She’ll out manage a few, too.
Agreed
She would absolutely be on the initial list at least if I were chairman of an EFL club looking for a manager.
Totally different level. It's like going from coaching a U15 team to managing Blackburn Rovers. It's not happening, unless you've played football at PL or EC level too.
She'll have to go the assistant route or go further down the league system, but how would the fans react and would the players respect her?
Also, why would she want to take such a massive pay cut to manage Dagenham Redbridge?
She'll have to go the assistant route or go further down the league system, but how would the fans react and would the players respect her?
Also, why would she want to take such a massive pay cut to manage Dagenham Redbridge?
It is a different level but her record is so extraordinary that, if she did apply (she wouldn't if it meant a pay cut, would she?), I'd at least want to hear what she had to say. As for the level any candidate played at, Wiegman or whoever, that wouldn't worry me one way or the other - the history of football is littered with great players who bombed in management, and ordinary ones who didn't.
Well, whoever gives her a chance in the League will be making a ballsy move. Will not be pretty if she fails.
Wouldn't disagree. Only Wiegman herself and whichever chairman was contemplating it could really weigh the chances up with any degree of confidence.
But it is unfair if Neville can go on to manage Inter Miami while Wiegman gets hired by Chelsea Women.
Again no dissent from me there. Manc Old Boys network innit.
Taking that kind of risk is how progress gets made though. Besides:
Are you saying that these women are as good as George Best, Keegan and Dalglish etc?
I think it’s pointless to compare much like men and women’s tennis. Just enjoy it for what it is.
Those guys are hardly representative of the overall standard in their era, even at top level. What you quoted was a reference to the slower pace and general lack of polish of the men's game then as opposed to now, and the fact that the gap nowadays between the women's and the men's game is equally wide.
Well, I watch men's football predominantly so I can't help having those standards in mind when I see a women's game and the standards of the latter are way lower, which is inevitably going to affect my enjoyment. I don't deliberately make a comparison, but I find doing so unavoidable.
Tennis is an interesting contrast in that I actually enjoy watching the women's game more. The men's game used to accommodate a greater range of playing styles but over the years has become a much more limited question of who has the heaviest artillery on the day.
I enjoy women’s test more too and really love women’s golf as their skill level with their longer clubs is insane.
I hope they paying her few hundred Ks a weekTaking that kind of risk is how progress gets made though. Besides:
Is it going home? 
Spain bossing this.
Really stupid question:
When a player is in possession and getting closed down but might not be aware, do they still shout "MAN ON!"?
When a player is in possession and getting closed down but might not be aware, do they still shout "MAN ON!"?
- Status
