• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

3 part series of The Red Sox Under the Ownership of NESV

Status
Not open for further replies.

spider-Neil

Well-Known
Member
PART 1

This will be a multi-part series. Part I will cover sporting results on the diamond in the decade before and after Henry's group took over. Part II will look at the owners themselves, their management philosophy with the Red Sox, and Fenway Park. Part III will cover financial matters - television revenue, ticket prices, and what you all need to understand about how drastically different baseball finances are from Premiership football.

Once, what seems like decades ago, a ridiculous hand of fate placed Liverpool in the city of my birth. One day in May, I boarded a bus to a stadium located in what looked like the middle of the moon, surrounded by craters. Red brigades marched through the desolate landscape to war at the Ataturk.

The fear of Istanbul featuring freakish failure was an ever-present feeling I had to keep bottled up in my stomach. To be sure, the overwhelming feeling was one of expected victory. I fervently wanted Istanbul to echo through eternity for the *right* reasons, and not as a black mark of failure. At halftime, by a laughable three goals, that fear almost – almost – won over the positivity. Almost.

When my Red brethren now inquire after my birthplace, my answer twinkles their eyes, widens their grin, and involuntarily opens their arms. That is how the story was written. Turkish flags adorn banners. "In Istanbul" echoes into the night. That pride, that energy, is my own incredible force that I bring to support Liverpool Football Club. My karakter, djes?

It could have been different of course. That fear could have manifested itself in a devastating explosion of humiliation. I could have carried that burden with me forever. My avatar certainly would have been different, for starters. That ball of fire we lit at 3-1 to strike fear into the hearts of the Romans may never have been etched into stone. I could have ended up being weak for life. Istanbul could have been Athens, I chide my Greek friends.

Now, once again, I find my own stars aligned. Boston and Liverpool? You must be joking, I thought, as the emails, instant messages, phone calls and texts poured in. What do you know? What can you tell us? Is this a good thing? You know you'll be defined by this, don't you?

So here goes.

I can't tell you whether the New England Sports Venture reign at Liverpool Football Club will be a success, much like I couldn't tell you how Istanbul would end up. What I can do, by telling you my own story, is to extend a Red hand, once again, and bring my energy to battle, first by giving you a window into the Boston Red Sox before, and during, the ownership of Henry, Werner and Lucchino, then delving a bit deeper into management philosophy, player recruitment, stadium affairs, and finances.

Having made Boston my home for the last 20 years, and attended university at Fenway's foot, the Red Sox are my local team. I've been to a lot of Red Sox games since 1991; probably north of 200 if I had to guess, but who’s counting.

First at the University of Massachusetts, I roomed with a lot of local diehards who blooded me, and took me to games. Then during my Northeastern days, we'd walk the 2 blocks from my house to the park after school, and piss about in the cheap seats - $7 for 3 hours in a bleacher seat was good cheap entertainment for college kids living around Fenway. Throughout my first decade in Boston, the Sox stunk for the most part, so tickets were cheap and plentiful. We went to see Roger Clemens - the Rocket as he was known back then - who was the pitching staff's ace. I actually saw him get a hit at Fenway one night, which is bizarre if you understand baseball. However, even though we won a couple division titles, losing to Cleveland - more than once - in the postseason was about the height of the era.

The GM at the time was a Massachusetts native, who pulled off a couple of good trades around 1997/1998, and threw together a pretty sick team anchored by Pedro Martinez, who had been acquired from the Montreal Expos to replace Clemens. We thought we were good.

I've never seen a better pitcher than Martinez. The 1999 team was the sickest thus far I'd seen in my short decade of going to Sox games. The way we finally thumped Cleveland was pure and unbridled entertainment. We won, and we were great. Only a matter of time till we won the whole enchilada. Or so I thought.

That year, the New York Yankees made mincemeat of us after we beat the Indians, jarring me into realization that the team I'd been supporting for 9 short years carried a monkey on its back. The Yankees had star draw. They had money. They had had a bad time of it recently, and were finally waking up again. They had the anti-Nomar, Derek Jeter. The press loved them. The neutrals loved them. And they fucking thumped the best team that Duquette had put together. Who were the Red Sox anyway? After all, we hadn't won a ring since 1918.

19 fucking 18. Go on, ask any Sox fan. What's 1918? The last time the Red Sox had won the World Series, that's what. The Sox sold their best player to the Yankees, and didn't win again. If you think a twenty year League drought is a heavy cross to bear, imagine the following scenario. In 1991, after winning the title, Liverpool sell Ian Rush to Manchester United. Rush goes on to become the most prolific striker in football history, scoring 40 goals a year for the next 10 years, playing longer and better than anyone could possibly have imagined. Liverpool don't win another title for over EIGHTY YEARS.

That's the size of the monkey - The Curse, as it's known around these parts - that Henry, Werner and Lucchino strapped to their backs. From 1918 to 2002, one team won everything while the other won nothing. One team had a bigger stadium and more money, while the other had a cute park and less money. One city was blessed, while the other was cursed, by the Bambino.

So does the Henry group and Boston still carry that monkey? Remarkably, no. See the results for yourself.

In 2000, the Red Sox won 85 games, and came in 2.5 games behind the Yankees.

In 2001, the Red Sox won 82 games, and came in 13.5 games behind the Yankees.

In 2002, the first year of the Henry, Werner and Lucchino reign, the Red Sox won 93 games, but still came in a whopping 10.5 games behind the Yankees, who won an incredible 103 games. The Sox owners installed Theo Epstein, an Ivy League nerd, as GM - aged 28. Think about that for a minute.

In 2003, their second year as owners, the Red Sox won 95 games, and came in 6 games behind the Yankees. The Red Sox qualified for the playoffs via the wild-card, and played the Yankees in the postseason. The best of 7 series went to Game 7, and still no winner emerged until the 11th inning, when the Yankees' Aaron fucking Boone hit a walk off home run (think Golden Goal in the second half of extra time), to send us home. Watching at a bar in the North End, I was fucking shattered. It was just impossible. There was no beating these rat bastards. The monkey had grabbed himself a pair of dumbbells. Grady Little was fired as team manager, and Terry Francona was hired.

In 2004, their third year as owners, the Red Sox won 98 games, and came in 3 games behind the Yankees. Again, we qualified via the wild card, and faced the Yankees in the playoffs. In the best of 7 series, the Yankees won the first three games, and the monkey started laughing and pissing down our back. Down 3-0? After winning 98 fucking games? That's just brutal. We faced the worst of all humiliations.

The Yankees took a lead in Game 4 at Fenway Park into the ninth inning, and brought out the best closer in the game to seal the series. Then the unthinkable happened. The Sox got a runner, stole a base, got a hit, and scored. TIE GAME, we screamed. We took it to 12 innings, when David Ortiz hit a game winning homerun, and Fenway park fucking exploded. 3-1 bitch. Cue flare. We are alive. 3-1. Pedro Martinez, Johnny Damon, Manny Ramirez, David Ortiz , Kevin Millar - we have a chance. Cowboy Up. We gonna win this.

The Sox won the next two games to tie up the series at 3-3, and you knew it was over before we went back to New York. It was exactly like Istanbul, 8 months early. It's why I knew once Alonso had scored that there would only be one winner. You don't blow 3-0 and expect to win. The monkey had switched backs. In New York, the Yankees were crushed, humiliated - Game 7 was never in doubt from the first inning. It was exactly like the penalty shoot-out in Istanbul. The Sox shot and the Yankees bled. The Red Sox went on to win the World Series in 2004 for the first time since 1918, after flying over Yankee Stadium and taking a shite on the bastards below.

With The Curse vanquished, the Red Sox settled down, and tied the Yankees in 2005 with 95 wins apiece, but lost to the Chicago White Sox in the playoffs.

In 2006, the Red Sox missed the playoffs with 86 wins. The Yankees won 97. In 2007, the Red Sox tacked on another World Series after winning 96 games, 3 games ahead of the Yankees. After nought for 86 years, the Red Sox were 2 for 4.

In 2008, the Red Sox won 95 games, and ended up 8 games ahead of the Yankees, who won 87. That encouraged they Yankees to break the bank, and break the bank they did. The fear got to them. They hadn't won a ring since 2000, and they threw four hundred million dollars at the problem.

In 2009, the Red Sox won 95 games, but ended up 8 games behind the Yankees, who went on to buy the World Series. In 2010, the Red Sox had a season not unlike the Liverpool season of 2009/1010, with a catastrophic injury list and some really shitty luck. We missed the playoffs, winning 89 games while the Yankees won 95.

There you have it. From a performance point of view, judged purely on results and championships, this ownership is the most successful we have ever had. We wanted rings; we got rings. We wanted to topple the New York gorrilla; we certainly knocked him off his fucking perch. We wanted to be perennial contenders; we're always thereabouts. The results speak for themselves. The Red Sox did not win in my grandfather's lifetime.

John Henry's reign has brought unparalleled success to the Red Sox.


End Part I
 
Part 2

In 2002, without much too fanfare (in comparison to the recent ruckus emanating from Merseyside, and next week, London), the Red Sox were bought by New England Sport Ventures, led by John Henry, Larry Lucchino, Tom Werner, the NY Times company and others. This was a handover of rather historic implications, as the club had been in the Yawkey family's hands since the Depression. After he died in the 70s, his wife took ownership, and when she died, the club went to her trust, from which NESV bought the club for about 650m dollars. By all accounts, Old Tom Yawkey was a bit of a racist prick. The Sox didn't win the World Series for the 50 years the Yawkeys owned the team. God likes black athletes.

One of the reasons that I don't recall there being much more than a few groups with competing interest in the Red Sox was partly due to Dan Duquette's self-serving claim that competing was impossible without a new stadium. Another reason was that NESV was buying the Red Sox not from the fat clenched fists of an ample be breasted Yank bank botherer, but, for all intents and purposes, a dead woman - Mrs Yawkey's trust, run by John Harrington. There were groups of rival bidders, most whom I can't remember, all of whom had some plan or other that I didn't really care much about. Honest. I didn't have to.

NESV's major characters were Henry (a millionaire futures trader), Tom Werner (an uber rich television producer), and Larry Lucchino (a lawyer, specifically, a sports lawyer, who is the current President and CEO of the Boston Red Sox). Lucchino has also served in the same capacity for two other baseball teams, who notably have built new stadiums on his watch. The Baltimore stadium is especially famous. They're all swimming in money and connections; one phone call away from the President sort of connections.

From Liverpool's point of view, there is much that is intriguing. All of the principals in NESV have extensive professional sports management experience. These guys have bought teams, built stadiums, and won championships. They enjoy sport; they enjoy winning and competing. While there are examples in their past of selling teams - some within a short period of time - their track record does not contain the serial leverage-buy-flip tendencies of Hicks and Gillette. As a member of Red Sox Nation, I have been witness to their longevity and prudent management techniques. Nine seasons they've been here, lads, and it's been a helluva ride. Much of baseball fandom would take our owners in a heartbeat. Ask a fan. Any fan.

Yet I'd like to make one thing crystal clear - I am not blindly endorsing NESV for Liverpool. As owners of the Red Sox, they have done very well. But that may or may not not have any bearing on what happens over on Merseyside. They're certainly good businessmen (proper businessmen, not fucking leveraged gamblers like that last two) and they've had success at every step of their careers. But this is an entirely different animal to anything *we've* seen lads! Never mind *them*. We're in the fucking relegation zone.

Anyway, having gotten that out, there are some similarities between the Red Sox of 2002 and the Liverpool of 2010 from NESV's point of view at acquisition time, and there are differences. The Red Sox had a bit of a championship monkey on their back, as do Liverpool. Both had small stadiums at takeover time. Yeah, they both wear red, and both teams' most glorious story contains a 3-0 comeback.

There are also some startling, and potentially worrying, differences. The Red Sox were never in this much crippling debt, and have a much more patient fanbase, one in fact that was accustomed to losing for almost 90 years. Liverpool is in a precarious situation with regards to finances. And we're a bit, shall we say, passionate about winning, and have never been losers. Ever.

Baseball doesn't have relegation. Football doesn't have a luxury tax levied on clubs who spend too much money on player wages, which is redistributed back to the poorer clubs. Therefore baseball is socialistic, and safe from disaster. Football is cut throat capitalistic, and failure equals death at the hands of fat cowboy bastard. Can NESV navigate the minefields of English football? Too early to say.

Also, when the NESV took over the Red Sox, they inherited talented players like Nomar, Pedro Martinez, Manny Ramirez and Jason Varitek who were never in danger of walking away. In baseball, you don't often get the Mascherano effect. With Liverpool right now, we've got a situation where every transfer window, everyone from the fans to the manager kisses some superstar's arse until he "declares his loyalty" as if his word is worth more than his signature (which bizarrely, I'm beginning to think it might be). We lost a lot of good talent the last 18 months, and I've no idea where the money's gone.

One thing I hope NESV get right is the stadium decision. They got that spectacularly right here in Boston. To be sure, I'm a traditionalist - I love Fenway Park.

At the time NESV came to Boston in 2002, a fierce debate had already been raging over whether a new stadium should be built. Fenway is historic; anyone who has been there cannot help but become enchanted. It's magic: the smells, the sights, the colours. It's old, it's tucked away, it's cute, it's got powerful reds and rolling greens, it's - I don't know - familiar, comfortable, and above all, a part of the city. But it's small. The cramped red seats are so small, you're positive that Fenway should fit more than 37,0000 of them chairs. Especially since we've a lot of fat bastards over here.

The same exact arguments being tossed back and forth about Liverpool's ability to compete while giving up a significant matchday revenue advantage to rivals was going on in Boston during the late 90s. There were new baseball stadiums sprouting up all over the place, started off in 1992 by Camden Yards in Baltimore, at which everyone ooh'd and aah'd. Detroit, San Francisco and Pittsburgh all opened grand new "retro" ballparks, and supposedly, we couldn't compete without one. Just like the Emirates and the City of Manchester stadiums show how stunted Liverpool's top line revenue is by comparison.

But NESV, instead, under their management, various creative methods were used to increase matchday seating - I think overall about 3000 more seats have been squeezed in - and total revenue. Whenever it's completely sold out, which is every game without fail for the last 600 odd games stretching back 5 years or something, you have standing room only areas too. It's a brilliant architectural maze now, with balconies you can discover, seats on top of walls, new platforms, aluminum decks, and for a while, they even brought in one of them golf mobile-home thingys and popped it up on top of left field as a luxury box. Verizon Communications chucked me two tickets to a double header up there, complete with waitress and food service, and me and my mate snuck back in for the second match and sat up in the roof box seat, smoking joints, laughing like idiots.

Ticket prices have gone up, no doubt. But it's fair to point out a few things here. First of all, I'm not advocating one way or the other for Anfield; just that I love the fact that Fenway is still Fenway. It's not sterile. It's not unfamiliar. It's still haunted. I'd still rather pay $50 to go to Fenway than $30 to go anywhere else.

Secondly, the NESV group has done a good job of having tiers of tickets, where rich guys make up for poor students. A ticket to the bleachers is now about $30, while there are plenty of $160+ even $200 tranches to be had. They also went bonkers on concessions - the beers were $8 this year, and if you fork over a ten for anything, not much is coming back. There are entire corporate sections that have waitress service. To your little red seat, with a credit card swiper. But your handy dandy tequila flask means you don't have to select one of 6 different shit beers and pay out the nose for it.

Thirdly, in addition to the Red Sox, NESV owns the stadium, and also owns NESN - which is the Red Sox television network. Lots and lots of money. I'm not sure there is an equal in the UK. It's sort of like - every home and away game except the weekend is on NESN (5 games a week). They make big bucks over a 162 game season. Advertising like you wouldn't believe - all over the stations, the stadium, the web sites, NESN this NESN that.

Finally, Boston's a rich town. The Red Sox are successful and they sell out. That is the cornerstone of the old stadium/park model. They need to charge relatively high prices, have a relatively affluent fanbase, and keep winning. I can still take the train down, sneak in my reposado in a flask, have a bag of peanuts and a couple beers, and leave for about $80 including tickets, which isn't bad for a bit of baseball and banter. Of course, I can easily drop up to $500 come playoff time (and have done).

But having said all that, the NESV group came into a situation that seemingly called for a wrecking ball to be taken to Fenway Park, and yet, managed to pull off a century old monkey and crush it - not once but twice - without putting me into a sterile new monstrosity. If I could offer my Scouse brethren anyone to help sort through the stadium minefield, I would probably steer you towards Lucchino's experience in this arena - he's both built stadiums for teams as well as done brilliantly without. Just don't hold me responsible if it's groundshare his financial models come up with


End Part II
 
Part 3

This final installment completes a three part series. The first looked at results under NESV's nine-year ownership reign. The second part drew parallels between the acquisition of two teams facing similar undersized stadium problems. The last was supposed to look at the books. It's important, as we've learned, to look at the very least a cursory look at the accounts. But numbers are boring to most, so after speaking with those on RAWK who I respect most, I decided to shift tracks a bit.

There are striking similarities in the takeovers of both assets, with a couple of twists. The Liverpool that Gillete first tried to buy in 2006 and the Boston Red Sox that Henry, Werner and the rest of the New England Sports Ventures power brokers had bought in 2002 were similar enough for us to wonder what might have been had Rick Parry and David Moores gotten the sale resoundingly right instead of thumpingly wrong.

Both were floundering under indecisive ownership: Liverpool were owned by David Moores - a stagnant owner who had neither the appetite for risk nor the capital to push a historic team to the next level, and wanted to cash out. The Sox had been owned by Tom Yawkey from the 1930s until his death in the late 70s, his widow thereafter until the early 90s, and the Yawkey trust managed by John Harrington to 2002 - basically, also an aimless existence. Both were in need of investment. Both were trailing only a handful of other teams in revenue. Both recognized growing gaps. Both had strong support manifested in fans who "got it", but also "wanted it". Both had championship monkeys on their back. Both had powerful and hated rivals dominating the league with more money.

To be sure, there were differences. The sport is different, for one: the concepts of revenue sharing and relegation have never before been mentioned in the same sentence. The Red Sox cost twice as much as Liverpool did. And baseball has one ultimate prize: the World Series, while I'd rather have Big Ears every fucking day of the week.

Now both teams had suitors. The franchise got it spectacularly right. The club got it agonizingly wrong.

NESV bought the the Red Sox in 2002 for somewhere around $650m, or about £450m at 2002 exchange rates. They came organized, fronted by John Henry's business acumen, Tom Werner's television connections and billions, and Larry Lucchino's expertise in baseball management and sports law. They settled in quickly, hired Theo Epstein and focused immediately on improving baseball results on the diamond. In their second year, the Sox came within a whisker of toppling the Yankees. In their third, they won the whole thing for the first time since 1918. Three years later, they won it again. They kept the stadium, and used their commercial acumen to stuff the coffers while putting the fans first. Their acquisition occurred at the right time; they rode the mother of all bull markets to financial success. Nine years later, they're still here.

The NESV takeover of the Boston Red Sox had substance behind it, began at a good entry point, with sufficient capital to service whatever debt they may take on, contained a wider range of skills, and was successful for a price more than twice what Hicks and Gillete failed at managing. It wasn't simply predicated on bothering banks. The results should have been predictable in both cases. NESV has been in charge of the Red Sox for nine years. At no time did it ever feel like they were desperately looking for the fire escape. In the years that they've been here, the Red Sox have set a record for consecutive sellouts stretching over 600 games, if I'm not mistaken.

Gilette came to Liverpool by himself 5 years later as the economy was showing signs of wobbling. He was at first snubbed because he couldn't come up with less than half of what the Henry and Werner cartel had casually raised a half decade earlier. That in and of itself should have been a warning. George re-loaded and returned with Tom Hicks to sweeten David Moores' pot to the point where the future of the club became secondary to an unbelievable profit for an owner looking to retire. Noone asked where the money was coming from. Phrases like "re-engineering the balance sheet" seemed simultaneously impressive and confusing enough to silence conversation. They did however bring precious little to the table compared with the Henry group acquiring the Sox - no management team behind them outside of their "fuckface" offspring, little capital of their own, unimpressive sport management expertise, no clear vision, and, most worryingly, little aversion to risk. Their most public commitment, the stadium, was vague. A stadium takes vision and patience, neither of which either of them possessed. They were cowboys.

We now know where the Ample Be Breasted Yank Bank Botherers went wrong. The entire business plan centred around bothering banks, always searching for an exit, with little patience. The poker analogy may be raising big with a weak hand against many players from early position, missing the flop, and then chasing cards, all the while using empty threats manifesting themselves in pushing lots of chips to scare away opposition. Musical debt, if you will. That's not a viable business plan, especially when the only thing that can fuck you, the mother of all credit crunches, rears its expected head.

Within a year of taking over, the Hicks regime had plastered £100m of debt on the club. In and of itself, debt is not a bad thing; manageable levels of long term debt at low cost can serve to acquire assets and thereby increase sales. But interest expense must be managed and kept to within safe levels when measured against turnover and net profit. That Hicks and Gillette let that expense get away from them serves to admonish their lack of business acumen, and reinforce the notion that they were only looking to flip an asset, like a real estate speculator who buys high hoping to sell higher. It was only going to end one way.

It's now time to ask ourselves once again what kind of owners we want. Those of you who know me have heard me say time and again that the RAWKish rebellion, started in part by the stoic Fat Scouser and led in part by the mercurial Royhendo, has a power unlike that which I've ever seen. It has also, however, been my opinion for months now that we need to throw our weight behind someone, not just protest against someone.

After the first two parts, I didn't know how to approach the third. A banker friend of mine and myself ripped up this town on Friday night. We started in the downtown area, and ended up there. In between, we circled Fenway Park, he just concentrating on being a good drunk, while I thought of this third installment, at Basho, and then at Eastern Standard, both good watering holes before baseball games. What I realized I wanted to tell you all is this.

There are those amongst us who focus on the differences between football and baseball management, who suggest that steering a $270m baseball business in America has too many differences with managing a £177m in the UK. Some have suggested that you need an Arab with stupid money to take on an Arab with stupid money, even after watching the folly of Yanks with leveraged money take on Yanks with leveraged money. Others are scared stiff of being dragged kicking and screaming into the commercial age, but still expect to win trophies like Barca while marketing like Bournemouth.

To be sure, there will be changes. Ticket prices will rise, but they're too smart to price out the locals. Commercialism will increase, but that's a queasy feature of the times we live in. If you yearn instant success, you may get it, but you're probably better off supporting City. If it's the pure old days you want, there's always Tranmere. But if it's the perch you want, I'm not sure we can do better than these guys.

It is not the differences between the Boston Red Sox and Liverpool Football Club that we should concentrate on, but the similarities. And while I myself am feeling the weight of responsibility of yet another American intrusion into the red half of Merseyside, this one feels different. This one feels like an alliance. This one feels right. They done right by us, lads. I have to hold my hand up and give credit where it's due. We should hold them accountable, for sure. Somehow, though, I feel that having a group of powerful men who specialize in taking Red teams from thereabouts to the summit, who have experience in both building stadiums and renovating them, who have a track record of business acumen backed by billions, and who dare - dare - fuck with my emotions by joining the Red Sox with Liverpool - deserve my endorsement.

I welcome our new American overlords. So should you.
 
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=42317.msg1200663#msg1200663 date=1287481324]
PART 1

This will be a multi-part series. Part I will cover sporting results on the diamond in the decade before and after Henry's group took over. Part II will look at the owners themselves, their management philosophy with the Red Sox, and Fenway Park. Part III will cover financial matters - television revenue, ticket prices, and what you all need to understand about how drastically different baseball finances are from Premiership football.

Once, what seems like decades ago, a ridiculous hand of fate placed Liverpool in the city of my birth. One day in May, I boarded a bus to a stadium located in what looked like the middle of the moon, surrounded by craters. Red brigades marched through the desolate landscape to war at the Ataturk.

The fear of Istanbul featuring freakish failure was an ever-present feeling I had to keep bottled up in my stomach. To be sure, the overwhelming feeling was one of expected victory. I fervently wanted Istanbul to echo through eternity for the *right* reasons, and not as a black mark of failure. At halftime, by a laughable three goals, that fear almost – almost – won over the positivity. Almost.

When my Red brethren now inquire after my birthplace, my answer twinkles their eyes, widens their grin, and involuntarily opens their arms. That is how the story was written. Turkish flags adorn banners. "In Istanbul" echoes into the night. That pride, that energy, is my own incredible force that I bring to support Liverpool Football Club. My karakter, djes?

It could have been different of course. That fear could have manifested itself in a devastating explosion of humiliation. I could have carried that burden with me forever. My avatar certainly would have been different, for starters. That ball of fire we lit at 3-1 to strike fear into the hearts of the Romans may never have been etched into stone. I could have ended up being weak for life. Istanbul could have been Athens, I chide my Greek friends.

Now, once again, I find my own stars aligned. Boston and Liverpool? You must be joking, I thought, as the emails, instant messages, phone calls and texts poured in. What do you know? What can you tell us? Is this a good thing? You know you'll be defined by this, don't you?

So here goes.

I can't tell you whether the New England Sports Venture reign at Liverpool Football Club will be a success, much like I couldn't tell you how Istanbul would end up. What I can do, by telling you my own story, is to extend a Red hand, once again, and bring my energy to battle, first by giving you a window into the Boston Red Sox before, and during, the ownership of Henry, Werner and Lucchino, then delving a bit deeper into management philosophy, player recruitment, stadium affairs, and finances.

Having made Boston my home for the last 20 years, and attended university at Fenway's foot, the Red Sox are my local team. I've been to a lot of Red Sox games since 1991; probably north of 200 if I had to guess, but who’s counting.

First at the University of Massachusetts, I roomed with a lot of local diehards who blooded me, and took me to games. Then during my Northeastern days, we'd walk the 2 blocks from my house to the park after school, and piss about in the cheap seats - $7 for 3 hours in a bleacher seat was good cheap entertainment for college kids living around Fenway. Throughout my first decade in Boston, the Sox stunk for the most part, so tickets were cheap and plentiful. We went to see Roger Clemens - the Rocket as he was known back then - who was the pitching staff's ace. I actually saw him get a hit at Fenway one night, which is bizarre if you understand baseball. However, even though we won a couple division titles, losing to Cleveland - more than once - in the postseason was about the height of the era.

The GM at the time was a Massachusetts native, who pulled off a couple of good trades around 1997/1998, and threw together a pretty sick team anchored by Pedro Martinez, who had been acquired from the Montreal Expos to replace Clemens. We thought we were good.

I've never seen a better pitcher than Martinez. The 1999 team was the sickest thus far I'd seen in my short decade of going to Sox games. The way we finally thumped Cleveland was pure and unbridled entertainment. We won, and we were great. Only a matter of time till we won the whole enchilada. Or so I thought.

That year, the New York Yankees made mincemeat of us after we beat the Indians, jarring me into realization that the team I'd been supporting for 9 short years carried a monkey on its back. The Yankees had star draw. They had money. They had had a bad time of it recently, and were finally waking up again. They had the anti-Nomar, Derek Jeter. The press loved them. The neutrals loved them. And they fucking thumped the best team that Duquette had put together. Who were the Red Sox anyway? After all, we hadn't won a ring since 1918.

19 fucking 18. Go on, ask any Sox fan. What's 1918? The last time the Red Sox had won the World Series, that's what. The Sox sold their best player to the Yankees, and didn't win again. If you think a twenty year League drought is a heavy cross to bear, imagine the following scenario. In 1991, after winning the title, Liverpool sell Ian Rush to Manchester United. Rush goes on to become the most prolific striker in football history, scoring 40 goals a year for the next 10 years, playing longer and better than anyone could possibly have imagined. Liverpool don't win another title for over EIGHTY YEARS.

That's the size of the monkey - The Curse, as it's known around these parts - that Henry, Werner and Lucchino strapped to their backs. From 1918 to 2002, one team won everything while the other won nothing. One team had a bigger stadium and more money, while the other had a cute park and less money. One city was blessed, while the other was cursed, by the Bambino.

So does the Henry group and Boston still carry that monkey? Remarkably, no. See the results for yourself.

In 2000, the Red Sox won 85 games, and came in 2.5 games behind the Yankees.

In 2001, the Red Sox won 82 games, and came in 13.5 games behind the Yankees.

In 2002, the first year of the Henry, Werner and Lucchino reign, the Red Sox won 93 games, but still came in a whopping 10.5 games behind the Yankees, who won an incredible 103 games. The Sox owners installed Theo Epstein, an Ivy League nerd, as GM - aged 28. Think about that for a minute.

In 2003, their second year as owners, the Red Sox won 95 games, and came in 6 games behind the Yankees. The Red Sox qualified for the playoffs via the wild-card, and played the Yankees in the postseason. The best of 7 series went to Game 7, and still no winner emerged until the 11th inning, when the Yankees' Aaron fucking Boone hit a walk off home run (think Golden Goal in the second half of extra time), to send us home. Watching at a bar in the North End, I was fucking shattered. It was just impossible. There was no beating these rat bastards. The monkey had grabbed himself a pair of dumbbells. Grady Little was fired as team manager, and Terry Francona was hired.

In 2004, their third year as owners, the Red Sox won 98 games, and came in 3 games behind the Yankees. Again, we qualified via the wild card, and faced the Yankees in the playoffs. In the best of 7 series, the Yankees won the first three games, and the monkey started laughing and pissing down our back. Down 3-0? After winning 98 fucking games? That's just brutal. We faced the worst of all humiliations.

The Yankees took a lead in Game 4 at Fenway Park into the ninth inning, and brought out the best closer in the game to seal the series. Then the unthinkable happened. The Sox got a runner, stole a base, got a hit, and scored. TIE GAME, we screamed. We took it to 12 innings, when David Ortiz hit a game winning homerun, and Fenway park fucking exploded. 3-1 bitch. Cue flare. We are alive. 3-1. Pedro Martinez, Johnny Damon, Manny Ramirez, David Ortiz , Kevin Millar - we have a chance. Cowboy Up. We gonna win this.

The Sox won the next two games to tie up the series at 3-3, and you knew it was over before we went back to New York. It was exactly like Istanbul, 8 months early. It's why I knew once Alonso had scored that there would only be one winner. You don't blow 3-0 and expect to win. The monkey had switched backs. In New York, the Yankees were crushed, humiliated - Game 7 was never in doubt from the first inning. It was exactly like the penalty shoot-out in Istanbul. The Sox shot and the Yankees bled. The Red Sox went on to win the World Series in 2004 for the first time since 1918, after flying over Yankee Stadium and taking a shite on the bastards below.

With The Curse vanquished, the Red Sox settled down, and tied the Yankees in 2005 with 95 wins apiece, but lost to the Chicago White Sox in the playoffs.

In 2006, the Red Sox missed the playoffs with 86 wins. The Yankees won 97. In 2007, the Red Sox tacked on another World Series after winning 96 games, 3 games ahead of the Yankees. After nought for 86 years, the Red Sox were 2 for 4.

In 2008, the Red Sox won 95 games, and ended up 8 games ahead of the Yankees, who won 87. That encouraged they Yankees to break the bank, and break the bank they did. The fear got to them. They hadn't won a ring since 2000, and they threw four hundred million dollars at the problem.

In 2009, the Red Sox won 95 games, but ended up 8 games behind the Yankees, who went on to buy the World Series. In 2010, the Red Sox had a season not unlike the Liverpool season of 2009/1010, with a catastrophic injury list and some really shitty luck. We missed the playoffs, winning 89 games while the Yankees won 95.

There you have it. From a performance point of view, judged purely on results and championships, this ownership is the most successful we have ever had. We wanted rings; we got rings. We wanted to topple the New York gorrilla; we certainly knocked him off his fucking perch. We wanted to be perennial contenders; we're always thereabouts. The results speak for themselves. The Red Sox did not win in my grandfather's lifetime.

John Henry's reign has brought unparalleled success to the Red Sox.


End Part I
[/quote]

I'd like to see the "perch" that could support a gorilla. 😉

Thanks for posting this though. Interesting stuff and very optimistic with it.
 
great read but I hope NESV don't underestimate the task at hand.

they will be up against money;
man city
chelsea

they will be up against experience;
wenger 10+ years
fergie 20+ years

they will be up against an equally well run business;
arsenal
 
[quote author=DHSC link=topic=42317.msg1200678#msg1200678 date=1287482026]
So. Many. Fucking. Words.
[/quote]

Yeah, I'm not reading that.

Sack Roy, appoint someone good and buy some players. Then we might be talking.
 
Wow...thats a really long article. I'll read it later...

Thanks spidey.

Can anyone do a quick three line summary?
 
[quote author=kingjulian link=topic=42317.msg1200705#msg1200705 date=1287485421]
Wow...thats a really long article. I'll read it later...

Thanks spidey.

Can anyone do a quick three line summary?



[/quote]



Part I - Sporting results on the diamond in the decade before and after Henry's group took over.

Part II - The owners, their management philosophy with the Red Sox, and Fenway Park.

Part III - Financial matters - television revenue, ticket prices, and what you all need to understand about how drastically different baseball finances are from Premiership football.
 
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=42317.msg1200666#msg1200666 date=1287481417]
Part 3

This final installment completes a three part series. The first looked at results under NESV's nine-year ownership reign. The second part drew parallels between the acquisition of two teams facing similar undersized stadium problems. The last was supposed to look at the books. It's important, as we've learned, to look at the very least a cursory look at the accounts. But numbers are boring to most, so after speaking with those on RAWK who I respect most, I decided to shift tracks a bit.

it was ok till i read this bit
[/quote]
 
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=42317.msg1200775#msg1200775 date=1287492215]
What the fuck is this load of self-important bollocks?
[/quote]

read it you might be surprised
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom