• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Post Match CL Atletico Madrid (H) 3-2 17th Sept 20:00

Poster Character Analysis: binomial
===================================

Styles: Analytical, Detailed Breakdown


Summary
-------
A highly opinionated and cynical forum poster, 'binomial' is passionately, almost obsessively, focused on their football club's transfer activities and on-pitch performance. They are quick to anger, frequently criticising the club's management, specific players, and fellow forum members with aggressive, profane, and hyperbolic language. Outside of football, they express similarly strong and aggressive views on geopolitical events.

Persona Traits
--------------
• Volatile and Reactionary
• Cynical and Pessimistic
• Passionate and Deeply Invested
• Confrontational and Abrasive
• Impatient
• Dogmatic

Communication Style
-------------------
• Profane and Insulting Language
• Hyperbolic Statements
• Short, Declarative Assertions
• Directly Quotes and Challenges Other Users
• Sarcastic and Dismissive

Sentiment Trends
----------------
Overview: Writing style is consistently critical, aggressive, and negative. The few classified posts confirm a tendency towards negativity and neutrality, with no positive expressions recorded.


Favourite Topics
----------------
Liverpool FC Transfer Activity
The user is intensely focused on player transfers, scouting, and the club's financial strategy. They express extreme frustration over perceived inaction and are highly critical of the club's recruitment team, particularly Sporting Director Richard Hughes and the owners (FSG).
Evidence:
- Richard Hughes is a monumental fucking cunt.
- Sign some talents from south america you cunts.
- This summer's failings are all on Hughes & to a lesser extent Edwards for appointing this dopey balloon headed smurf.
- WE NEED A STRIKERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Criticism of Player Performance
They are quick to pass harsh judgment on players, often in a vulgar manner. Mo Salah is a frequent and recent target of their ire, while they staunchly defend others, like Darwin Núñez.
Evidence:
- Salah is shit.
- I call everyone a cunt. He's fucking shite ya blind cunt.
- He'll happily hook a Quansah or Kerkez for looking half as bad.
Geopolitics and Conflict
The poster engages in threads on international conflicts, such as those involving Russia and the Israel-Hamas conflict, with the same aggressive and unequivocal tone used in football discussions.
Evidence:
- 12 years of empty threats from this fucking Kremlin mong, when do we get to drop a nuke on his little boney head.
- This bloody war has been waging on and off for as long as we've all lived, it's time to put an end to it.
Arne Slot (Manager)
Initially uncertain about the new manager, they have become a staunch defender and supporter of Arne Slot, often using his performance to criticise the club's management for not backing him sufficiently.
Evidence:
- The good start is all down to Arne, he and the players take the credit for the work they put it.
- Same cunts that'll ruin what should be an iconic first season to remember for Arne and they're gonna fuck it all up for us.

Notable Behaviours
------------------
The Transfer Rumour Hype Cycle
The user exhibits a predictable emotional cycle during transfer rumours. They begin with cynical dismissal, get swept up into intense excitement and impatience if the rumour gains traction, and then revert to dismissal or anger if the transfer fails to materialise quickly.
Evidence:
- We're not signing Wirtz. Next.
- Fuck it, welcome to the club Florian!!!!!!!!!!
- Announce the fucker already.
- Oh well, never wanted him anyway.
• Attacking Other Users
They frequently and directly insult other posters, dismissing their opinions with profanity and aggression. This appears to be their default mode of disagreement.
Evidence:
- What kind of stupid fucking twat do you have to be, get your head checked.
- You're giving them far too much of the credit, they've done fuck all...
- Fuck off back to general chat lads.
• Scapegoating and Blame Attribution
Consistently assigns blame for all club failings to a small group of individuals: the owners (FSG), the CEO of Football (Michael Edwards), and the Sporting Director (Richard Hughes). This externalises all problems and rarely considers broader factors.
Evidence:
- The reason we haven't won more, will and will always be on people like JWH, Edwards and now Hughes.
- FSG, Edwards and Hughes are all cunts.....there isn't a limit to how many times this can be emphasized.
Vindication Seeking
Shows a tendency to claim they were right all along, often framing their past opinions as persecuted truths that others have finally accepted. This is particularly evident when the general forum mood aligns with their long-held cynical views.
Evidence:
- Isn't it funny how last summer I was lambasted for mentioning the simple observation that we needed to get off our arses and sign at least 4 players... and now every cunt here has finally come to their senses.

Writing Style
-------------
tone: Consistently aggressive, cynical, sarcastic, and confrontational. Prone to extreme profanity and hyperbolic expressions of rage or, occasionally, elation.
structure: Favours short, punchy, declarative statements. Arguments are built on assertion and repetition rather than detailed, reasoned analysis. Often uses quoting to isolate and attack specific points from other users.
pacing: Overwhelmingly concise and abrupt. Many posts are single sentences or short paragraphs designed for maximum impact, often ending with an insult or expletive.

Engagement Tips
---------------
• Do not take personal insults seriously; their aggressive style is a general characteristic and not necessarily targeted.
• Avoid engaging in debates on sensitive club topics (e.g., FSG's ownership, Mo Salah's form) unless prepared for a profane and dismissive response.
• Recognise that their opinions are highly reactionary and subject to rapid change based on the latest news or performance.
• Engaging with facts and statistics is unlikely to be productive if it contradicts their established narrative.
That actually made me appreciate @binomial even more!
 
Poster Character Analysis: binomial
===================================

Styles: Analytical, Detailed Breakdown


Summary
-------
A highly opinionated and cynical forum poster, 'binomial' is passionately, almost obsessively, focused on their football club's transfer activities and on-pitch performance. They are quick to anger, frequently criticising the club's management, specific players, and fellow forum members with aggressive, profane, and hyperbolic language. Outside of football, they express similarly strong and aggressive views on geopolitical events.

Persona Traits
--------------
• Volatile and Reactionary
• Cynical and Pessimistic
• Passionate and Deeply Invested
• Confrontational and Abrasive
• Impatient
• Dogmatic

Communication Style
-------------------
• Profane and Insulting Language
• Hyperbolic Statements
• Short, Declarative Assertions
• Directly Quotes and Challenges Other Users
• Sarcastic and Dismissive

Sentiment Trends
----------------
Overview: Writing style is consistently critical, aggressive, and negative. The few classified posts confirm a tendency towards negativity and neutrality, with no positive expressions recorded.


Favourite Topics
----------------
Liverpool FC Transfer Activity
The user is intensely focused on player transfers, scouting, and the club's financial strategy. They express extreme frustration over perceived inaction and are highly critical of the club's recruitment team, particularly Sporting Director Richard Hughes and the owners (FSG).
Evidence:
- Richard Hughes is a monumental fucking cunt.
- Sign some talents from south america you cunts.
- This summer's failings are all on Hughes & to a lesser extent Edwards for appointing this dopey balloon headed smurf.
- WE NEED A STRIKERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Criticism of Player Performance
They are quick to pass harsh judgment on players, often in a vulgar manner. Mo Salah is a frequent and recent target of their ire, while they staunchly defend others, like Darwin Núñez.
Evidence:
- Salah is shit.
- I call everyone a cunt. He's fucking shite ya blind cunt.
- He'll happily hook a Quansah or Kerkez for looking half as bad.
Geopolitics and Conflict
The poster engages in threads on international conflicts, such as those involving Russia and the Israel-Hamas conflict, with the same aggressive and unequivocal tone used in football discussions.
Evidence:
- 12 years of empty threats from this fucking Kremlin mong, when do we get to drop a nuke on his little boney head.
- This bloody war has been waging on and off for as long as we've all lived, it's time to put an end to it.
Arne Slot (Manager)
Initially uncertain about the new manager, they have become a staunch defender and supporter of Arne Slot, often using his performance to criticise the club's management for not backing him sufficiently.
Evidence:
- The good start is all down to Arne, he and the players take the credit for the work they put it.
- Same cunts that'll ruin what should be an iconic first season to remember for Arne and they're gonna fuck it all up for us.

Notable Behaviours
------------------
The Transfer Rumour Hype Cycle
The user exhibits a predictable emotional cycle during transfer rumours. They begin with cynical dismissal, get swept up into intense excitement and impatience if the rumour gains traction, and then revert to dismissal or anger if the transfer fails to materialise quickly.
Evidence:
- We're not signing Wirtz. Next.
- Fuck it, welcome to the club Florian!!!!!!!!!!
- Announce the fucker already.
- Oh well, never wanted him anyway.
• Attacking Other Users
They frequently and directly insult other posters, dismissing their opinions with profanity and aggression. This appears to be their default mode of disagreement.
Evidence:
- What kind of stupid fucking twat do you have to be, get your head checked.
- You're giving them far too much of the credit, they've done fuck all...
- Fuck off back to general chat lads.
• Scapegoating and Blame Attribution
Consistently assigns blame for all club failings to a small group of individuals: the owners (FSG), the CEO of Football (Michael Edwards), and the Sporting Director (Richard Hughes). This externalises all problems and rarely considers broader factors.
Evidence:
- The reason we haven't won more, will and will always be on people like JWH, Edwards and now Hughes.
- FSG, Edwards and Hughes are all cunts.....there isn't a limit to how many times this can be emphasized.
Vindication Seeking
Shows a tendency to claim they were right all along, often framing their past opinions as persecuted truths that others have finally accepted. This is particularly evident when the general forum mood aligns with their long-held cynical views.
Evidence:
- Isn't it funny how last summer I was lambasted for mentioning the simple observation that we needed to get off our arses and sign at least 4 players... and now every cunt here has finally come to their senses.

Writing Style
-------------
tone: Consistently aggressive, cynical, sarcastic, and confrontational. Prone to extreme profanity and hyperbolic expressions of rage or, occasionally, elation.
structure: Favours short, punchy, declarative statements. Arguments are built on assertion and repetition rather than detailed, reasoned analysis. Often uses quoting to isolate and attack specific points from other users.
pacing: Overwhelmingly concise and abrupt. Many posts are single sentences or short paragraphs designed for maximum impact, often ending with an insult or expletive.

Engagement Tips
---------------
• Do not take personal insults seriously; their aggressive style is a general characteristic and not necessarily targeted.
• Avoid engaging in debates on sensitive club topics (e.g., FSG's ownership, Mo Salah's form) unless prepared for a profane and dismissive response.
• Recognise that their opinions are highly reactionary and subject to rapid change based on the latest news or performance.
• Engaging with facts and statistics is unlikely to be productive if it contradicts their established narrative.

I've always assumed Binomial was just a misspelling of Bipolar
 

Alexander Isak’s Liverpool debut provides box-office glamour despite rust​

Barney Ronay
As non-goalscoring club debuts go, Isak’s 57 minutes at Anfield made for a fascinating spectacle

Now witness the firepower of this fully operational Death Star. Four months, one record transfer and an endless rolling multiverse of internet rage since his last club game, Alexander Isak has now finally rematerialised in physical form.

As rust-laden, non-goalscoring club debuts go, Isak’s 57 minutes at Anfield made for a fascinating spectacle. In part for the sheer event glamour, the rubbernecking aspect, like witnessing a personal appearance at a shopping centre by your favourite controversial reality TV star. But also for the sheer data overload in a thrillingly open game dotted with wildness: from a Diego Simeone crowd‑surf red‑card climax, to the endless tactical complexities that continue to flow from Arne Slot’s attempts to re-gear his Liverpool team along these giddily attacking lines.


The key takeaway: it’s going to be open. There will be high‑wire energy. There will be an avalanche of goals. There will also be periods of vulnerability, as there was at Anfield, where for at least an hour after the opening 10 minutes it felt like Atlético Madrid were basically winning the game.

And because this is football there was even time for some comedy. Nine minutes into his debut, with Liverpool already 2‑0 up, Isak still hadn’t touched the ball. Maybe, the thought occurred, he’s never going to touch the ball. They’ll win the treble and he’ll never touch the ball, just do a lot of peripheral running about while football happens nearby, the most confusing glory-laden 55-game season ever staged, perhaps some kind of one-man act of protest against the spectacle.

In the event Isak did touch the ball, his first as a Liverpool player a wayward return pass to Ryan Gravenberch. His second was a moment of authentic muscle memory, a glide and a snipe sideways past Conor Gallagher. In between he lurked in the centre, asserting his own gravity. He looked good. Egg yolk boots, white ankle wraps, red No 9 shirt. Isak has a distinctive and endearing physicality, gangly legs, soft, tender brown eyes, the shark‑like way of moving.

How good is he? Nobody really knows. Isak doesn’t know. This is a footballer in state of mid‑career bloom, reaching up towards his own ceiling. There has even been a degree of pshawing already, pursed lips at the value placed on a footballer with two good goalscoring seasons. But Isak’s value lies in his rarity.

The reason there are fewer specialist goalscorers is because being a specialist goalscorer isn’t enough. The role is so much more complex. We need a finisher. But you’ll also have to be a team cog, press unit, pass rotator, endurance athlete, digester of data. And do all this from the earliest age just to get through the pathways when no one knows if anyone is any good, so the metrics have to be ticked off.

Alexander Isak takes on Atlético Madrid’s Robin Le Normand

Isak has all this, or has had it so far. Here he had his best spell close to half-time. With 38 minutes gone he took a pass from Florian Wirtz, half-turned and shot with no backlift, proper striker stuff, a goal Isak will score when he isn’t coming off four months out. From the same spot moments later he yawned inside and shot again.

There was a lovely give and go, a nudged return pass to Wirtz. And of the two things worth saying about Isak’s debut this was the big positive. He brought the best out of Mohamed Salah, although this was less balance or interplay, more an act of status assertion, alpha-dom. With six minutes gone Salah had a goal and, technically, an assist, his free-kick deflected in off Andy Robertson. Salah’s goal was a lovely thing, a glimpse of his ability to paint these tiny miniatures, the Sistine Chapel on a grain of rice, jostled by three defenders, feet battering the turf, going right, left, then into the far corner.


Salah has had a drop‑off, has perhaps missed Trent Alexander‑Arnold, moping a little, like a labrador pining for its departed owner. This was a glimpse of actual Salah, the same super slick nightmare of power and speed on the right. Isak combined more overly with Wirtz, and while this involved quite a few errant passes and mistimed runs it was still progress.

The other side of this was that openness at the back of midfield. Every game Wirtz plays as a No 10 it will leave the risk of the midfield pivot being outnumbered. And Atlético were always in this game, roused by Simeone appearing on the touchline diffusing his own unique main‑character energy: Soprano-style black suit, strange scary hair, eyes like globs of mercury, a jawline you could grate cheese on. Even Simeone’s shoes are frightening. Where do you buy shoes like that? On a submarine? At a secret arms dealer convention hall?

Atlético pulled it back to 2-2, before going down to Virgil van Dijk’s late winner. Slot will wrestle with these questions of balance and openness. For now he can also bask in the possibilities.
Love reading Ronay's articles.
 
Back
Top Bottom