[quote author=Skullflower link=topic=46910.msg1401323#msg1401323 date=1316367718]
[quote author=Dylan link=topic=46910.msg1401315#msg1401315 date=1316367310]
The question is irrelevant. Getting £50m for Torres skewed everything. Look at it this way, £7m for Suarez and Carroll was good business.
[/quote]
that makes no fucking sense.
[/quote]
Actually it does, but i'll play along.
My point is this, had we not received £50m for Torres we wouldn't have spent £35m on Carroll. So if Torres' departure meant we were £7m down on replacing him with Suarez and Carroll, i'd say that's good business regardless of the fees paid for each individual player.
[quote author=Dylan link=topic=46910.msg1401315#msg1401315 date=1316367310]
The question is irrelevant. Getting £50m for Torres skewed everything. Look at it this way, £7m for Suarez and Carroll was good business.
[/quote]
that makes no fucking sense.
[/quote]
Actually it does, but i'll play along.
My point is this, had we not received £50m for Torres we wouldn't have spent £35m on Carroll. So if Torres' departure meant we were £7m down on replacing him with Suarez and Carroll, i'd say that's good business regardless of the fees paid for each individual player.