Mark1975 : Don't be, he's a United graduate, so..
Thanks. Not sorry for the cunt anymore. 
Post Match - Shrews (H) - Kids are alright!
- Thread starter LeTallecWiz
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
Thought it was for this too...
He was clearly offside. Don't understand the problem.
Fully deserved to win, we played really well. The kids done good
Is this true? When will it be moved to?
Don't know when it'll be moved to, just read that it would be moved. It'd almost certainly be after the city game, which would mean if both sides keep winning, then we'd need to beat them to win the league on 4th April.
That rule has been in place for ages, but now with VAR it can be enforced well. Harsh but fair, by the way in the match thread you asked if their own goal was scored by the same guy from the first round - same thought I had, was pissing myself laughing when the goal went in thinking it must be the same guy.
It has always been the rule that if somebody is passed to in an offside position, then they are offside. That guy was in an offside position. The only difference is that refs have been encouraged to keep their flags down if it is reasonably tight to avoid incorrectly flagging, and it can be checked if it leads to anything. In this case, it did. I don't find it slightly contentious.
Looks like the scorer was offside to me
I love you. But if you say "offsideS" once more, we're through.
They’d better fucking lose to the chavs, then... I have a ticket for the Palace game and a flight from Japan booked!
Do we have a replacement for Clyne already? Wonder how that will affect decision on Ki-Jana Hoever's long term playing position
Wonder how that will affect decision on Ki-Jana Hoever's long term playing position
Hope not. I'm flying back from Mexico on April 4. I dont want to watch the title winning match from the airport in Cancun.
For sure, he's expressed some interest and has done some of the certifications.
He's certainly not going to have any issue with the training side of things.
i was reading this article Liverpool's Curtis Jones pulls off ridiculous nutmeg skill to embarrass Shrewsbury defender when i saw the pic.i was thinking why do they erase no 70 face. who is he. then i realized. it's yasser larouchi hair. duh.
the article is about the shrews game but the picture was from the ev game if i'm not mistaken.
They can move it to next season. We don’t need the points this season
I was going to post this after reading about it in the Mirror. It says so much about Milner and about what's happening at the club ... The kids are being 'raised' with the right models around them so hopefully, even if it's not with us, they'll have successful careers elsewhere.
I was also thinking last night that this game showed that perhaps Liverpool should push to have an u23 team in Division 1 or 2, as this would give them proper competition, pump in more money to the lower leagues & hopefully, create for Liverpool what the Real Madrid & Barca B & C teams in Spain while playing in lower divisions.
and to repeat again, SvB was really good ... which is what Rurik had been saying earlier.
Glad to see him improving after he was written off by so many for earlier poor performances.
Glad to see him improving after he was written off by so many for earlier poor performances.
To be fair he Said offisdes
So the fa declined to produce & broadcast that match, we know that cos they said so, & the echo & supersport confirmed it.
The only way that it could have been broadcast is surely the through the club doing so & sending it in the world feed themselves?
If that's the case, then there could be some seriously big fall out from this, & it could be exactly what the fa don't want, a stepping stone towards clubs being able to split broadcasts, & at least start a debate about the clubs right to do so.
Considering our owners background & experience, I'm not really surprised, but if this is the case, then I suspect the FA could regret their decision for a long time to come.
The only way that it could have been broadcast is surely the through the club doing so & sending it in the world feed themselves?
If that's the case, then there could be some seriously big fall out from this, & it could be exactly what the fa don't want, a stepping stone towards clubs being able to split broadcasts, & at least start a debate about the clubs right to do so.
Considering our owners background & experience, I'm not really surprised, but if this is the case, then I suspect the FA could regret their decision for a long time to come.
- Status
Similar threads
-
- Locked
