• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Rio

3 Years? WTAF?
As @737Max said, we can't do a long-term deal with him due to his age (and we also can't lavish a huge salary on him just yet either, although there'll be big bonuses).
As soon as he's old enough, he'll be signing a newer deal, 5-6 years and a better base salary.
There's a good chance that there'll already be a better deal attached to the current one which can be activated by the player when he's 18. It was normal practice when we brought kids in on scholarship deals (under which they get paid peanuts) that there would be a pro deal attached to it which would be on better terms, and would be signed as soon as they were old enough.
Nothing to worry about here.
 
Tell us, oh Beamy one?
Pretty much every deal we do with an agent is around circumventing (= breaking) some rule or other.
Everyone does it. That was always the justification (I used to call it the Lance Armstrong defence).
e.g. if we don't get a payment to this promising 15 year-old's Dad, he'll sign for City because they will sort him out. Variations on a theme with bigger numbers the higher you go up the chain.
Not saying we did this, but I know it goes on:
Club A wants a player from Club B.
Club B wants £40m, Club A only has £25m.
Enter mysterious agent, he's paid £2.5m by Club A and then Club B's president agrees to sell the player for £25m.
Where does the £2.5m go?
 
As @737Max said, we can't do a long-term deal with him due to his age (and we also can't lavish a huge salary on him just yet either, although there'll be big bonuses).
As soon as he's old enough, he'll be signing a newer deal, 5-6 years and a better base salary.
There's a good chance that there'll already be a better deal attached to the current one which can be activated by the player when he's 18. It was normal practice when we brought kids in on scholarship deals (under which they get paid peanuts) that there would be a pro deal attached to it which would be on better terms, and would be signed as soon as they were old enough.
Nothing to worry about here.

I can see it being one of those where he signs a new deal every year or two until he's 21/22 to increase terms and length when applicable.
 
Pretty much every deal we do with an agent is around circumventing (= breaking) some rule or other.
Everyone does it. That was always the justification (I used to call it the Lance Armstrong defence).
e.g. if we don't get a payment to this promising 15 year-old's Dad, he'll sign for City because they will sort him out. Variations on a theme with bigger numbers the higher you go up the chain.
Not saying we did this, but I know it goes on:
Club A wants a player from Club B.
Club B wants £40m, Club A only has £25m.
Enter mysterious agent, he's paid £2.5m by Club A and then Club B's president agrees to sell the player for £25m.
Where does the £2.5m go?

Thanks for the illumination.
 
Back
Top Bottom