Was that intentional?how he walks free from this.
I have a strong feeling he's going to pull an OJ on it and walk.
It's all to obvious he did it, but he's got a great legal team.
As far as I understand it he didn't have his blades on. Rather he was just on his 'stumps' as they phrase it in the trial. Pretty much his whole defence rests on this as he felt helpless to an intruder hence why he kind of stumpy walked/crawled to the bathroom and started plugging away.....Serious question. If he was in bed then did he not have to also reattach his prosthetics before getting his gun and tackling an intruder?
I have a strong feeling he's going to pull an OJ on it and walk.
It's all to obvious he did it, but he's got a great legal team.
As far as I understand it he didn't have his blades on. Rather he was just on his 'stumps' as they phrase it in the trial. Pretty much his whole defence rests on this as he felt helpless to an intruder hence why he kind of stumpy walked/crawled to the bathroom and started plugging away.....
As far as I understand it he didn't have his blades on. Rather he was just on his 'stumps' as they phrase it in the trial. Pretty much his whole defence rests on this as he felt helpless to an intruder hence why he kind of stumpy walked/crawled to the bathroom and started plugging away.....
The prosecution will probably use forensics to argue that the shots were fired from shoulder height and he therefore had his blades on.
When the police showed up he was wearing them anyway. It makes no sense if you'd accidently blown your girlfriend away that you walk back to the bedroom and put on your blades.
I think the judge should ask him to prove that he can walk on his stumps, that would be awesome. Like a sobriety test. When he falls flat on his face the entire courtroom would gasp it'd be genius