• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Well it would be ruida not to

How do you loan a player who is already out on a loan and is apparently playing well for Sunderland.

It will take a significantly bigger loan fee paid to Sunderland to have them agree to terminate the loan? And why would his parent club agree since they have nothing to benefit out of this?

It's all really confusing.
 
How do you loan a player who is already out on a loan and is apparently playing well for Sunderland.

It will take a significantly bigger loan fee paid to Sunderland to have them agree to terminate the loan? And why would his parent club agree since they have nothing to benefit out of this?

It's all really confusing.
I'm guessing here. Sunderland probably wouldn't mind a dedicated CB since they don't need RB cover with two 1st/2nd choices already there. I'm also guessing because the way their other summer business panned out they're not up to making him permanent. So a swap for an out and out CB would suit them if they get a couple of £M to incentivise them.

For Red Bull they perhaps see the permanent sale becoming unlikely so swapping to us where we have JoGo and Konate out of contract in the Summer and Dutch coach probably is attractive.

So I'd assume it will be a few Mill to Sunderland to release, a few million to RB for the loan and then an agreed optional end of loan buy fee of about €25M+add ons

Everyone happy
 
Although I'd normally be dubious of bringing in players the manager worked with previously, in the case of stubborn Slot this may mean he'll actually play the guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dee
Back
Top Bottom