[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=40455.msg1112227#msg1112227 date=1275564839]
[quote author=grjt link=topic=40455.msg1112206#msg1112206 date=1275564002]
[quote author=rebel23 link=topic=40455.msg1112163#msg1112163 date=1275562602]
two things that make it likely ;
1) predators will circle and flash their eyes at our better players. we will then see if they are loyal to this Liverpool board as the spin from Purslow suggests or if they hand in transfer requests after a long running media saga
2) it might suit the yanks to sell the high value players who are on big contracts to cut costs and pay off the debt they have to pay under the covenants agreed with the bank and give the new guy (someone who will accept the situation and manage our decline) a fraction of that money to bring in new players and fill the void
This is why I think they're getting rid of Benitez as he would have blown the lid on their plan and they can't have that
[/quote]
1) that is nothing to do with asset-stripping. Yes, after a poor finish in the leagueand no CL next year, our better players will be approached.
2) This is absolute an total nonsense. Why in gods name are they going to be interested in reducing the debt on the club by selling players? Their ONLY interest at this time is achieving the best possible price for the club - they dont give a shit about the level of debt, or about loan charges - they will not achieve this by selling the most marketable faces of the playing staff
[/quote]
This is the mistake that the cult are making, they can't see that it is in the the owners interests to keep the club viable and marketable, and now they have dumped a fractious loose cannon of a manager that is more the case than it was.
Part of the problem here is that the cult all presume they know more about everything than the people running the club. Now, yes, they have made mistakes, along the way, but you don't get to be billionaire's like Hicks and Gillett by being particularly stupid, nor do you become Chairman of BA, and a much respected man in The City like Broughton by being the class dunce, nor I suspect in Christian "The Snake" Purslow's position by not eating your greens.
These people are pretty shrewd cookies most of the time and will in fact have a plan and will not have made the decision on a whim, and there will be a reason for the timing, and they will not have acted alone.
regards
[/quote]
even if the owners didn't want to sell the stars the stars may attempt to force their own exits as I doubt many will want to stick around in a club that will be in transition for at least a couple of years.
[quote author=grjt link=topic=40455.msg1112206#msg1112206 date=1275564002]
[quote author=rebel23 link=topic=40455.msg1112163#msg1112163 date=1275562602]
two things that make it likely ;
1) predators will circle and flash their eyes at our better players. we will then see if they are loyal to this Liverpool board as the spin from Purslow suggests or if they hand in transfer requests after a long running media saga
2) it might suit the yanks to sell the high value players who are on big contracts to cut costs and pay off the debt they have to pay under the covenants agreed with the bank and give the new guy (someone who will accept the situation and manage our decline) a fraction of that money to bring in new players and fill the void
This is why I think they're getting rid of Benitez as he would have blown the lid on their plan and they can't have that
[/quote]
1) that is nothing to do with asset-stripping. Yes, after a poor finish in the leagueand no CL next year, our better players will be approached.
2) This is absolute an total nonsense. Why in gods name are they going to be interested in reducing the debt on the club by selling players? Their ONLY interest at this time is achieving the best possible price for the club - they dont give a shit about the level of debt, or about loan charges - they will not achieve this by selling the most marketable faces of the playing staff
[/quote]
This is the mistake that the cult are making, they can't see that it is in the the owners interests to keep the club viable and marketable, and now they have dumped a fractious loose cannon of a manager that is more the case than it was.
Part of the problem here is that the cult all presume they know more about everything than the people running the club. Now, yes, they have made mistakes, along the way, but you don't get to be billionaire's like Hicks and Gillett by being particularly stupid, nor do you become Chairman of BA, and a much respected man in The City like Broughton by being the class dunce, nor I suspect in Christian "The Snake" Purslow's position by not eating your greens.
These people are pretty shrewd cookies most of the time and will in fact have a plan and will not have made the decision on a whim, and there will be a reason for the timing, and they will not have acted alone.
regards
[/quote]
even if the owners didn't want to sell the stars the stars may attempt to force their own exits as I doubt many will want to stick around in a club that will be in transition for at least a couple of years.