View: https://x.com/SkyNewsBreak/status/1944407930419265607?t=hVl9UdlP1ZhM7k9bi5jNZQ&s=19
Been a whole lot of errors from the IDF.
Former Israeli PM Ehud Olmert is quite obviously an anti-semite and hates Israel.
I’m a Genocide Scholar. I Know It When I See It.
"My inescapable conclusion has become that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people. Having grown up in a Zionist home, lived the first half of my life in Israel, served in the IDF as a soldier and officer and spent most of my career researching and writing on war crimes and the Holocaust, this was a painful conclusion to reach, and one that I resisted as long as I could. But I have been teaching classes on genocide for a quarter of a century. I can recognize one when I see one."
"To this day, only a few scholars of the Holocaust, and no institution dedicated to researching and commemorating it, has issued a warning that Israel could be accused of carrying out war crimes, crimes against humanity, ethnic cleansing or genocide. This silence has made a mockery of the slogan 'Never again,' transforming its meaning from an assertion of resistance to inhumanity wherever it is perpetrated to an excuse, an apology, indeed, even a carte blanche for destroying others by invoking one’s own past victimhood."
Yes, but are you Protestant non-religious or Catholic non-religious?Ah whataboutism, great, about time you tried deflection.
I'd say most people do give a fuck about it, do you? The difference is that no country I know of is supporting that, but a lot of them are supporting what Israel are doing, both in terms of political support and financial.
Also, you're not the same religion as me, I'm not religious at all. And even if we were, we do not share the same values.
Also reflected on the challenge of posters being respectful & having respect for long time posters, support LFC all ya like but there's gotta be red lines.
I'd think supporting, denying, not utterly condemning the actions of genocidal people is a pretty solid start to a red line on people's values/morals.
@Atlas, along similar lines, is it not depressingly hilarious that for so many years you, and others, were constantly challenged with "yeah, but DO YOU CONDEMN X Terrorist act" every time you dared to discuss historical context or nuance?
And yet he's doing the same? Very ironic.
I - won't speak for others - don't tend to post in this thread any more because as I said a long time ago, I think there is a fundamental intellectual dishonesty and whatever common ground there might be - and given I've found that with Syrians, Iranians and many from the middle east from different origins (there always some common ground) - it's not worth finding here in my opinion.
And also, yes, despite the constant sniggering, it does at times also stray into antisemitism. You are a mod and know a post got reported for that - and not by one of "us". If I'm honest, a few more could have been as well.
I don't feel the need to come back in here constantly and let you know what my thoughts are. You can claim to know them already if you wish.
If "we" are not welcome here and let's not be prude, name names, then let's just be open and honest about that.
Also reflected on the challenge of posters being respectful & having respect for long time posters, support LFC all ya like but there's gotta be red lines.
I'd think supporting, denying, not utterly condemning the actions of genocidal people is a pretty solid start to a red line on people's values/morals.
Ah that famous Jew humour.
Oy Vey
Amirite
Failing to be "utterly vocal against a genocide" would include you all day long. You've made no mention of Oct.7th except when challenged on it and even then in the briefest and most non-committal terms.
Your clearly and offensively antisemitic post was this one:
I've said more than once that I'm against the settlement agenda which has infiltrated what was initially a fully justified military campaign against the perpetrators of Oct.7. I've also said in past discussions on the subject that I'll be equally vocal on both sides' excesses in the region when you and those lining up with you do the same. Until then, you and those lining up with you are in no position to pass moral judgments on anybody.
I've said anyone responsible for murdering civilians in Oct 7th should be send to trial. I've said that plenty of times.
The ICC alongside Galant and Bibi also had arrest warrant for Deif. I've said before anyone responsible should face trail.
Yet here you are telling me you'll only call out the murder of babies when someone else calls out something you found evil. How are you taking that as a moral stance, I'll show you mine if you show me yours.
I'm obv not a mod, but I wonder how many people have reported some of the utter racism from posters on this thread.
Yet someones gonna get pissy cos I said Oy Vey?? Not one of 'us' either.. so who was it that was so upset with my shit gag.
I don't as a rule, but this place is different. There is and always has been an inherent anti-Israel bias in this discussion and I refuse to go along with it. Those who read what's in front of them, instead of posturing and patting each other on the back for repeating the Party Line, will be in no doubt about what I think of Israel's actions.
That's just not what I said at all.What I'm telling you is that I'll call out the murder of babies on both sides with equal emphasis when you do the same. You have never done that, even in this post above when you dismiss the cutting of the throats of Israeli babies in their cots as "something you found evil".
I guess I haven't noticed the bias through the thread, I did go looking for the other day when it was mentioned. Outside of the one you pointed out above, which ones are you talking about that are going right through? I fine it hard to not be accused of antisemitism when criticizing Israel.