Now that we’ve hit our first little snag of the season (I’m sure it won’t be the last), it’s tempting to make definitive judgements on new signings. I think the best criteria of whether a player will succeed or not is not whether they have hit the ground running, but rather the underlying attributes that led to the signing in the first place.
Take Chelsea’s Caicedo. We all thought he was great at Brighton and felt quite positive about it when it looked like we’ve won the race. Then he went to Chelsea, endured a very uncertain start, which people maybe don’t expect for “Premier league proven” players, so some tried to cast him as a flop. Now he’s widely considered one of the best midfielders in the league. Or take Peter Crouch who famously couldn’t score in his first 18 or 19 games for us, but went on to be regarded as a success and one of the key players of the Benitez era.
So hitting the ground running or not can be deceiving and Premier league proven players can struggle in a new team too. Instead, let’s look at underlying qualities of each of the new signings to try to predict if they will ultimately come good:
=============
Kerkez - the qualities we saw at Bournemouth were speed, energy, good crossing, tenaciousness in duels. At Liverpool we also see rashness and inexplicable defensive mistakes and so far very little attacking output. Verdict: Kerkez will come good because his underlying qualities are solid and problems look mostly temporary/solvable.
Frimpong - in contrast to Kerkez, it seems like he was used in a highly specialized way at his previous club, whereas we need a more all-around RB. Unless he dramatically improves several aspects of his game, he won’t be a starter.
Wirtz - it’s tempting to say he was great for Bayer, so of course he will come good sooner rather than later. I think it’s a bit more complicated than that. It’s not like Wirtz is not already showing all the technical qualities that made everyone want him - he still glides past players, first touch is great and his workrate cannot be faulted. He is not playing badly - so why then is he not effective? For me the short answer lies in the nature of the Premier League football - there is a certain type of attacking player that is more likely to succeed here and for other types they have to be really, really damn good to make it. I think Wirtz can succeed because he’s not a finished article and has talent and drive to improve - but he will need to become a better version of himself to make it as a #10 in the EPL. The Leverkusen Wirtz, if he doesn’t progress beyond that level, won’t cut it, so I guess the verdict on him is that jury’s still out.
=============
I don’t have time today to write about Isak and Ekitike, maybe someone else wants to pick up the mantle?
Take Chelsea’s Caicedo. We all thought he was great at Brighton and felt quite positive about it when it looked like we’ve won the race. Then he went to Chelsea, endured a very uncertain start, which people maybe don’t expect for “Premier league proven” players, so some tried to cast him as a flop. Now he’s widely considered one of the best midfielders in the league. Or take Peter Crouch who famously couldn’t score in his first 18 or 19 games for us, but went on to be regarded as a success and one of the key players of the Benitez era.
So hitting the ground running or not can be deceiving and Premier league proven players can struggle in a new team too. Instead, let’s look at underlying qualities of each of the new signings to try to predict if they will ultimately come good:
=============
Kerkez - the qualities we saw at Bournemouth were speed, energy, good crossing, tenaciousness in duels. At Liverpool we also see rashness and inexplicable defensive mistakes and so far very little attacking output. Verdict: Kerkez will come good because his underlying qualities are solid and problems look mostly temporary/solvable.
Frimpong - in contrast to Kerkez, it seems like he was used in a highly specialized way at his previous club, whereas we need a more all-around RB. Unless he dramatically improves several aspects of his game, he won’t be a starter.
Wirtz - it’s tempting to say he was great for Bayer, so of course he will come good sooner rather than later. I think it’s a bit more complicated than that. It’s not like Wirtz is not already showing all the technical qualities that made everyone want him - he still glides past players, first touch is great and his workrate cannot be faulted. He is not playing badly - so why then is he not effective? For me the short answer lies in the nature of the Premier League football - there is a certain type of attacking player that is more likely to succeed here and for other types they have to be really, really damn good to make it. I think Wirtz can succeed because he’s not a finished article and has talent and drive to improve - but he will need to become a better version of himself to make it as a #10 in the EPL. The Leverkusen Wirtz, if he doesn’t progress beyond that level, won’t cut it, so I guess the verdict on him is that jury’s still out.
=============
I don’t have time today to write about Isak and Ekitike, maybe someone else wants to pick up the mantle?