• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

She's dead

So treatments for cancer are never turned down for lack of 'a few million'?

That's bollocks.

Schools close for much less cash.

Police stations have been closed fucking everywhere for less cash each. That 8m could have kept my local station open for 4 years. A girl was attacked & sexually assaulted yards away from it a few weeks ago.

You're either on a huge wind up or you're very misguided.


But those things don't happen for the lack of £8m. They happen because without a line drawn on a general approach to spending decisions, then no limit could ever be put on spending in total. To imply that the £8m spent on the funeral will actually deprive some other service of funds is just completely absurd.
 
All the hospital scanner appeals must be a con?

All the hospital ward closures just some lefty myth?

All the A&E closures that happened all over the country must be lies? Peter says we have the money.
 
But those things don't happen for the lack of £8m. They happen because without a line drawn on a general approach to spending decisions, then no limit could ever be put on spending in total. To imply that the £8m spent on the funeral will actually deprive some other service of funds is just completely absurd.

So that 8m comes from some other magic pot of cash that doesn't deprive any other service in any way shape or form?

You can't truly believe that.
 
The public, yes, the public through charity donations and support from private enterprise have paid for the following at Alder Hey:

£10m Oncology unit
The first of its kind in the UK to house research, learning and treatment under one roof, with dedicated teenage areas.

£3m Intra Operative 3T MRI Scanner & Theatre Suite
The first of its kind in Europe, donated by the Barclay Foundation.

The £600k refurbishment of the Physiotherapy Unit in partnership with the AF Foundation.

Over £6m in the last 5 years on medical equipment Ranging from bone scanners, ECMO machines and specialist Epilepsy facilities.

Over £2m supporting vital research and groundbreaking initiatives

Over £300k supporting the Arts Programme

Yeah, £8m is irrelevant.
 
All the hospital scanner appeals must be a con?

All the hospital ward closures just some lefty myth?

All the A&E closures that happened all over the country must be lies? Peter says we have the money.


Read my last reply. You're all either being deliberately obtuse, or - well, I think I've insulted people enough the last couple of days, but, y'know.
 
So that 8m comes from some other magic pot of cash that doesn't deprive any other service in any way shape or form?

You can't truly believe that.

That's the way it is. The government operates at a completely different level from you and me. Surely you know that. The £8m is either borrowed or created out of thin air.

Of course, we all pay for it one way or another, that *is* true. But it won't actually be taken from another spending commitment.
 
Im pretty sure Maggie wouldnt want the taxpayer money to fund any funerals, except her irrelevant one obviously...
 
Thatcher went to war with the mining unions. But her adversary’s role is often overlooked. Arthur Scargill was the boss of the National Union of Mineworkers, and what sort of a man was he?
In an extraordinary interview with BBC 5Live in 2000, Scargill reminded us that he was a Stalinist who adamantly supported the USSR, and suggested the Russian gulags - in which millions perished - might not have existed (prompting the listener who’d asked him about it to draw a parallel with David Irving’s holocaust denials). Famously, when asked how much losses a pit could make before being considered for closure, Scargill replied “the loss is without limits”.
On the eve of the strikes in 1984 energy minister Peter Walker put together a deal offering miners another job or a voluntary redundancy package, plus £800m investment in mining. He told Thatcher: “I think this meets every emotional issue the miners have. And it’s expensive, but not as expensive as a coal strike”. Thatcher replied “You know, I agree with you”.
Scargill turned down the offer, vetoed the expected ballot of miners to decide whether to strike, and, called a strike (Scargill later wrote about his decision in the Guardian).
Scargill’s politics eventually proved too extreme for his erstwhile political allies on the left, and he ended his career isolated and mocked by his fellow socialists. These days he declines to give interviews.​

http://www.londonlovesbusiness.com/...s/7-most-annoying-thatcher-myths/5218.article

People who believe the miners strike was about uneconomical pits are the same follks who think the first gulf war was about moral outrage at Iraq's invasion of Kuwait - i.e. the deluded.

Hint 1 - the miners strike was deliberatley provoked so the bitch coudl take on & beat the unions.
Hint 2 - the first gulf war (and arguably the second) was about US imperialism (backed by the bitch just before she resigned as PM) protecting their oil interests

Scargill had his faults, but it wasnt about Thatcher vs Scargill (though the media obviously jumped on the bandwagon to deamonise him), it was about Thatcher and her class interests taking on organised labour. Unfortunately the NUM was let down by the leadership of the labour movement (both party & TUC) at the time, and irreperable damage was done to the organised power of the working class. With some unity & solidarity at the time the bitch woudl have lost that strike, probably been dumped from power and we would not now be having a debate on whether or not it is right to celebrate her death as she woudl be a mere sidenote in history.
 
As usual, what was needed was somewhere in between where sacrifices were required on both sides for the long term benefit of the country.

Instead we got two idiots more interested in self preservation & dogmatic ideology creating a political war where there could only be one winner and lots of losers.

My experience with Trade Union Leaders, is that they are pretty much the same sort of cunts as politician, with the same sociopathic tendencies.

Might you, the so called "business leaders" that now pull the government strings are cut from the same cloth as well.
 
only this country would moan about spending some money on the security and armed forces for an ex PM funeral. A PM of 11 years.

I would expect the same for Tony Blair and I never supported him, regardless of if you liked her or not she is of historical significance and the world will expect a send of some sort.
 
i am surprised a big tory rich supporter has not come up and paid the £8 million to stop this stupid arguing otherwise this will be focused on for ages when it shouldn't be
 
That's the way it is. The government operates at a completely different level from you and me. Surely you know that. The £8m is either borrowed or created out of thin air.

Of course, we all pay for it one way or another, that *is* true. But it won't actually be taken from another spending commitment.

No one is saying it is. You're deliberately taking us as being obtuse and ignorant of the facts, we're not. We know how the economics work, we're talking (again) about morals and the fact that the government is making cuts across the board but can finance a funeral for £8m for a figure they know was both controversial and divisive. I'm not suggesting it's money that was going on a new Health Centre in Stockport (for example), but it could have done.

The Tax payer is getting screwed at the minute "doing there bit" as our latest fantastic Tory leader put it - increases in Council Tax, heavy VAT, fuel prices and transport costs that are through the roof - hey, of course we don't mind doing our bit for the economy, take as much as you want and leave my pay at the same rate it was two years ago, so what's £8m?

Morally it's fucking WRONG.

Fox - the necessity to pay for so much security should surely tell you as much about public feeling and about this government's hypocrisy. Something yourself and Peter seem keen to once again to polish over. It would sicken me if it was Blair too, for the record. This notion that £8m is a 'drop in the ocean' sums up my anger at Tory attitudes and Peter's general standing throughout this thread.
 
only this country would moan about spending some money on the security and armed forces for an ex PM funeral. A PM of 11 years.

I would expect the same for Tony Blair and I never supported him, regardless of if you liked her or not she is of historical significance and the world will expect a send of some sort.

So were Hitler and Pol Pot.
 
Atlee was a change prime minister too. I dont recall him getting the same type of funeral.

If i was a family member i would be inclined to ask for a small family service and stop the pantomime.

I am a bit surprised the queen is going. Mainly because if you couple it with certain politicians not being invited to the wedding and possibly the queen mums funeral then you can make a case for there being a political bias.
 
oh and as for PeterH's view that £8m is nothing in terms of government spending.

Well thats correct, however when people point out how small a proportion, of the overall public expenditure the number of people not working and having lots ok kids are, you seem to be bothered about that.
 

I'm unsure why you thought to post a story about the figures involved in a mining dispute in 1984?

The damage to industry and the resulting mass unemployment peaked in 1981, several years before.

Incidentally, your random if irrelevant pick does, I'm sure, remind those around at the time of the genesis of Police mistrust. Marshalling Police from around the country to block motorways, blockade towns and pits and herd miners was a daily TV feature. It's why many Police don para-military uniforms today and why no-one trusts them as they're seen as an agent of the Government with an agenda and not a public service.

Another Thatcher legacy.
 
I used to work for an organisation that provides a service to people who need it..

The Citzens Advice Bureau.. They for years depended on Goverment funding.. Due to cuts and what have you, they have had a huge wedge of that pulled.. at the same time having to lay people off who where providing a service that was very much needed, leaving a huge gap...

That 8 million may not sound much, but that could be better spent for an organistation like the CAB in Vulnerable areas..

Point is, its a complete outrage at the time where the focus has been on spending cuts they go and spend 8 million of Tax payers money on a funeral.. This 8 Million doesn't take into account the expenses the MP's who will be attending the funeral will claim..

She was not a royal and therefore doesnt warrant a state funeral! She was a politician who rightly or wrongly made decisions which affected millions of people's lives. Some were destroyed as a result, others were built up and they enjoyed an elevated and inflated lifestyle..
Some she brought together, others she split apart for good.

Dont ask us to pay for her funeral due to her lifestyle and decisions
 
I used to work for an organisation that provides a service to people who need it..

The Citzens Advice Bureau.. They for years depended on Goverment funding.. Due to cuts and what have you, they have had a huge wedge of that pulled.. at the same time having to lay people off who where providing a service that was very much needed, leaving a huge gap...

That 8 million may not sound much, but that could be better spent for an organistation like the CAB in Vulnerable areas..

Point is, its a complete outrage at the time where the focus has been on spending cuts they go and spend 8 million of Tax payers money on a funeral.. This 8 Million doesn't take into account the expenses the MP's who will be attending the funeral will claim..

She was not a royal and therefore doesnt warrant a state funeral! She was a politician who rightly or wrongly made decisions which affected millions of people's lives. Some were destroyed as a result, others were built up and they enjoyed an elevated and inflated lifestyle..
Some she brought together, others she split apart for good.

Dont ask us to pay for her funeral due to her lifestyle and decisions

I don't even know where our CAB is here anymore or if we still have one. I know their offices closed a couple of years back.
 
Back
Top Bottom