None because they've got all the money they need apparently.
Lucky for them.
None because they've got all the money they need apparently.
So treatments for cancer are never turned down for lack of 'a few million'?
That's bollocks.
Schools close for much less cash.
Police stations have been closed fucking everywhere for less cash each. That 8m could have kept my local station open for 4 years. A girl was attacked & sexually assaulted yards away from it a few weeks ago.
You're either on a huge wind up or you're very misguided.
But those things don't happen for the lack of £8m. They happen because without a line drawn on a general approach to spending decisions, then no limit could ever be put on spending in total. To imply that the £8m spent on the funeral will actually deprive some other service of funds is just completely absurd.
All the hospital scanner appeals must be a con?
All the hospital ward closures just some lefty myth?
All the A&E closures that happened all over the country must be lies? Peter says we have the money.
So that 8m comes from some other magic pot of cash that doesn't deprive any other service in any way shape or form?
You can't truly believe that.
Im pretty sure Maggie wouldnt want the taxpayer money to fund any funerals, except her irrelevant one obviously...
You liberals are full of contradictions you know...She wasn't an anarchist!
Are we agreeing I had the last word and we can lock this thread?Well if there's one compliment I wouldn't mind paying you I suppose it'd be consistency.
Can someone summarize this thread for me because I can't be bothered to read back through it all.
She's dead.
Thatcher went to war with the mining unions. But her adversary’s role is often overlooked. Arthur Scargill was the boss of the National Union of Mineworkers, and what sort of a man was he?
In an extraordinary interview with BBC 5Live in 2000, Scargill reminded us that he was a Stalinist who adamantly supported the USSR, and suggested the Russian gulags - in which millions perished - might not have existed (prompting the listener who’d asked him about it to draw a parallel with David Irving’s holocaust denials). Famously, when asked how much losses a pit could make before being considered for closure, Scargill replied “the loss is without limits”.
On the eve of the strikes in 1984 energy minister Peter Walker put together a deal offering miners another job or a voluntary redundancy package, plus £800m investment in mining. He told Thatcher: “I think this meets every emotional issue the miners have. And it’s expensive, but not as expensive as a coal strike”. Thatcher replied “You know, I agree with you”.
Scargill turned down the offer, vetoed the expected ballot of miners to decide whether to strike, and, called a strike (Scargill later wrote about his decision in the Guardian).
Scargill’s politics eventually proved too extreme for his erstwhile political allies on the left, and he ended his career isolated and mocked by his fellow socialists. These days he declines to give interviews.
http://www.londonlovesbusiness.com/...s/7-most-annoying-thatcher-myths/5218.article
only this country would moan about spending some money on the security and armed forces for an ex PM funeral. A PM of 11 years.Haha
I bet the party poppers , fireworks and ale around the country add up to way more than a paltry 8 million .
That's the way it is. The government operates at a completely different level from you and me. Surely you know that. The £8m is either borrowed or created out of thin air.
Of course, we all pay for it one way or another, that *is* true. But it won't actually be taken from another spending commitment.
only this country would moan about spending some money on the security and armed forces for an ex PM funeral. A PM of 11 years.
I would expect the same for Tony Blair
only this country would moan about spending some money on the security and armed forces for an ex PM funeral. A PM of 11 years.
I would expect the same for Tony Blair and I never supported him, regardless of if you liked her or not she is of historical significance and the world will expect a send of some sort.
I used to work for an organisation that provides a service to people who need it..
The Citzens Advice Bureau.. They for years depended on Goverment funding.. Due to cuts and what have you, they have had a huge wedge of that pulled.. at the same time having to lay people off who where providing a service that was very much needed, leaving a huge gap...
That 8 million may not sound much, but that could be better spent for an organistation like the CAB in Vulnerable areas..
Point is, its a complete outrage at the time where the focus has been on spending cuts they go and spend 8 million of Tax payers money on a funeral.. This 8 Million doesn't take into account the expenses the MP's who will be attending the funeral will claim..
She was not a royal and therefore doesnt warrant a state funeral! She was a politician who rightly or wrongly made decisions which affected millions of people's lives. Some were destroyed as a result, others were built up and they enjoyed an elevated and inflated lifestyle..
Some she brought together, others she split apart for good.
Dont ask us to pay for her funeral due to her lifestyle and decisions