They should have just imported everything from rugby, including the players who take a battering before they are injured - not from a 20m pass.I have never watched a Rugby game Froggy but I assume they have competent referees there. A big problem in English football is not the rules, it it is execution.
We've been down this road many times before, "oh but they work in so and so therefore it'll work in football", for a start Rugby has a completely different ruleset. We're only adding more fuel to the fire here. Instead of simplifying, we're overcomplicating.I agree with them. They work great in Rugby and the time can be used to decide if it's a red or not without holding up the game, as in rugby where it works brilliantly.
"...that should have been a yellow card"
"What are you talking about?! Its clearly a blue offence"
"No, straight red for me"
Etc.
There will always be that debate because it's subjective. But the flexibility means poor fouls and mouthy gits will be punished instead of being let off because it isn't deemed 'serious enough' for a red or 2nd yellow."...that should have been a yellow card"
"What are you talking about?! Its clearly a blue offence"
"No, straight red for me"
Etc.
Hardly a fringe sport however it could be tiddly winks but if they've got the officiating right then that's something to learn from them.I think we should start taking tips from the rugby fart sniffers when another couple of billion people start watching it. There's a reason it's a fringe sport.
I've always liked the idea of sin bins. Then again I always liked the alternative idea to the golden goal or pens. Reduce each team by a player every two mins until someone eventually scores. I guess I have a perchant for the absurd.