We would have got a 100M for him. Suarez bite cost us 25M. That was an expensive bit of business.
Suppose a 200%+ profit is great business. Thats the consolation.No, the clause was. At least, that's why there was no chance of getting more.
Suppose a 200%+ profit is great business. Thats the consolation.
The clause messed us up but we would have definately got more even at 27. Suarez offers what no other striker in world football does. He is a ball of energy who guarantees goals.I think it was a decent deal. But, I look at the real scarcity of world class strikers, let alone really creative ones like Suarez, and I do wonder if even at 27 we might have got more for him. Barca agreed to the fee pretty snappily.
The clause messed us up but we would have definately got more even at 27. Suarez offers what no other striker in world football does. He is a ball of energy who guarantees goals.
Personally, I would have preferred he stayed for another season.
A bird in the hand I suppose!Yeah. I think we probably could have got them to £85m plus say £10m in add ons.
Oh well.
How could we have got more if there was such a clause (as there clearly was) in his contract?
I meant that I think it was a mistake to insert the clause.
Doubt he would have signed the contract if we hadn't. From the sounds of it Suarez had made it pretty clear to the club he wanted to go to Spain sooner or later, so it was just a question of setting a price that we thought we could reasonably get but wasn't underselling him.
Why did we need him to sign the contract? He'd only signed one the year before.
Without the inserted clause and bidding war, we could have got more. Its the measure of his immense talent despite his age.75m for a player who had a clause at 40m last summer, who has 2 peak years left with little sell on value for the purchasing club? We really cannot complain because there was no other offered diving up the price.
I suppose technically we didn't, but we would probably have run the risk of coming into conflict with him every summer if Barca/Real bid something he thought was acceptable which we didn't.
They allowed for the transfer activity but I'm past the point of caring with a bulging bank accountIf Barca aren't allowed to unveil him i'm surprised they haven't called signing a contract a 'football related activity'
It all seemed a bit agenda-ish to allow the transfer but stop him being allowed to even step in a stadium. Ban him, but keep the profile of top class players going to the richest clubs going eh? Commercial bullshit.
Why did we need him to sign the contract? He'd only signed one the year before.
To increase the release clause.
Exactly - and, to be absolutely fair to the guy, he could perfectly well have refused.
Yeah, what a stand up guy. He could have so easily refused to be held to a large pay increase and a guarantee to be allowed to join Barcelona. But he came through for us. It's beautiful, in a way.
He'd have got himself millions extra if he'd stuck to the previous deal, forced a move this summer and got the kickback from Barca which that would have involved.