Uruguay vs the FA
- Thread starter rurikbird
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
FIFA have stepped in to the trippier ban. The FA banned him meaning he misses loads of games in another federation but no England matches. Atletico are fuming.
I was looking for something re: Suarez too. Perhaps given Suarez' prior antics they didn't want to choose that hill to die on.
Lol
For about the 7 millionth time, Suarez did not say he used the word "Negrito" , which was the term Cavani used.
Unlike Cavani, Suarez was in the middle of a heated row when he used the word "negro". Referring to someone's colour in the middle of a heated argument is at best unwise.
Maybe one day people will actually read the report of the evidence Suarez gave to the ref and the FA.
Wondering why they didn't speak out for Suarez in the same way, but overall I fully support this. Racism is a problem, but a bunch of old white men in the FA deciding who in their view is racist isn't the solution.
Because Suarez is a horrible cunt in general.
It's the diminutive of the same word, if you want to be a pedantito. It's also more affectionate though, for sure, especially in the two different contexts.
Scenario 1: "Thanks dude"
Scenario 2: "Fuck off mate"
You're trying to say 'dude' is the term of affection, and 'mate' is the term of racial abuse, because of the context they are being used in. Repeating it doesn't make it any less retarded. Your laughable grasp of language and sentence construction leaves much to be desired.
You’d think he’d been aware of what happened to his international team mate. It’s not like that was brushed under the carpet.
I love the fact that the FA called on a Latin American Studies academic to help 'resolve' the issue. Apparently he said that 'negrito' wasn't deemed offensive in Latin American countries but might be somewhere else. Ka-ching! Thanks for that, mate, incredibly good specialist info. Now back you go to co-writing eight page articles with three other wastes of space.
No he didn't because the word negrito wasn't at issue in the Suarez hearing.
How is that people continue to spout this absolute tripe about what happened in the Suarez hearing when they've never bothered to read it ?
If only the report was publicly available we could simply copy and paste what actually was said ....
"The FA instructed the experts to prepare a written report on the various linguistic and
cultural interpretations of the word "negro" or "negros" in Latin American Spanish and
especially Spanish as spoken in the River Plate region (castellano rioplatense)."
And :
"To recap, Mr Suarez's case was that he had used the word "negro" once only when Mr
Evra said "Don't touch me, South American" and Mr Suarez replied "Por que, negro?",
meaning "Why black?". Mr Suarez said that this exchange took place when the referee
blew his whistle to stop the corner being taken, and that the touching to which Mr Evra
was referring was Mr Suarez's foul on him five minutes previously. Mr Suarez further said
that his use of the word “negro” was conciliatory and friendly and was commonly used in
this way in Uruguay. "
As I've been saying for years Negrito was a red herring thrown into the media by our Lizard owners and it has caught on amongst the majority who, as we've seen in the US election thread , have an inability to decipher the truth and understand when the media is being used to manipulate them.
I'm just quoting the report about Cavani, you obsessive bastard! I'm well aware of all of that. So much for your self-touted forensic hermeneutic skills!
- Status
