To think Suarez is innocent you have to ignore his own comments to the Ref, as witnessed by Commoli and Kuyt. You also probably need to be brain-dead. To Suarez's denied using the n word. But instead said , yeah during that time we were having a row I was using the word "negro". I also said I kicked him because he is black. (The last two sentences are enough to be found guilty of the charges) When interviewed by the FA (post legal advice) - that story was completely changed. And we're now supposed to believe there was no reference to Evra's skin colour made by Suarez who then said what he actually said was "It was a normal foul" when asked by Evra why he kicked him. Evra didn't even need to give evidence and Suarez would have still been found guilty. Blaming Evra is a complete red herring. Suarez was in the wrong and did a terrible job covering it up. The initial accusation was that the n word was used. The players all knew that wasn't the case and that's why they wore the jerseys - they do look stupid now but in a way they were justified at the time. There's no getting around the fact the Suarez racially abused Evra. It wasn't the n word but it didn't need to be.